AlexFlame116
Member
Bubsy's time to shine.
I want to know more about this.
That one guy had to ruin everything, I wonder what his deduction was for?
"If the song includes "1-UP" in the lyrics, and there are no lives in this game, does that make the content redundant? I do not like unneeded fat in my games. -1 pointeru."
That one guy had to ruin everything, I wonder what his deduction was for?
Not every reviewer gave Zelda a 10.Fools saying that mario was gonna overtake Zelda?
HA.
Either way Xenoblade 2 is definitely gonna be special.
Fools saying that mario was gonna overtake Zelda?
HA.
Either way Xenoblade 2 is definitely gonna be special.
NoDid they say anything about the length? Is it true that it has as much stars as korok seeds in zelda?
LOLGreat score from Famitsu for Odyssey. As of recently, only 45 games received a near-perfect score from Famitsu (and only 25 a perfect score).
They needed to pay Famitsu to start the Switch strong
They didn't need to do so with Mario
That's actually higher than the scores they gave to the Galaxy games.
Galaxy: 38/40
Galaxy 2: 37/40
Seems like Famitsu staff aren't quite as enthralled with 3D Marios as much as the rest of the world is...
Japan in general is like this. Same with Zelda etc.
Pre-order canceled.
I only play 40s.
WTF...That's actually higher than the scores they gave to the Galaxy games.
Galaxy: 38/40
Galaxy 2: 37/40
.Only near perfect?
Preorder cancelled.
It's a sign that this game is not going to score that high.
It's a sign that this game is not going to score that high.
Japanese game not getting a perfect score from Famitsu is a disaster, Nintendo should just cancel this turd.
What the hell are you talking about?I think it will hover around the 94-95 range on Metacritic (definitely not a 98... or 97 actually that BOTW had there).
I love BOTW, but a 97 it is not. A 90 mostly. A great open-world game, but a shitty Zelda game. Even though I agree with all of the criticisms of it, I still wouldn't give it less than 90.
Mario seems poised to not repeat the same mistake and depart so significantly from the template.
????BOTW got 40/40 from them and yet it had a 98 (and eventually, a 97) from Metacritic. Pretty sure its indicative of Mario having 90-95 range on there.
I think it will hover around the 94-95 range on Metacritic (definitely not a 98... or 97 actually that BOTW had there).
I love BOTW, but a 97 it is not. A 90 mostly. A great open-world game, but a shitty Zelda game. Even though I agree with all of the criticisms of it, I still wouldn't give it less than 90.
Mario seems poised to not repeat the same mistake and depart so significantly from the template.
Not the person you're quoting but yes and noSo if Mario Odyssey is a fantastic game, but a shitty Mario game, it should get lower scores...?
What a Zelda game is has become so nebulous anyway that you just described a great Zelda game. But Im not going to argue with you, it just seems hilarious that for every person intent on criticising Nintendo for sticking to their guns too often (something theyve rarely done looking at their history) theres one person that claims Oddysey is a mistake because it goes so far from the template.I think it will hover around the 94-95 range on Metacritic (definitely not a 98... or 97 actually that BOTW had there).
I love BOTW, but a 97 it is not. A 90 mostly. A great open-world game, but a shitty Zelda game. Even though I agree with all of the criticisms of it, I still wouldn't give it less than 90.
Mario seems poised to not repeat the same mistake and depart so significantly from the template.
What a Zelda game is has become so nebulous anyway that you just described a great Zelda game. But Im not going to argue with you, it just seems hilarious that for every person intent on criticising Nintendo for sticking to their guns too often (something theyve rarely done looking at their history) theres one person that claims Oddysey is a mistake because it goes so far from the template.
So if Mario Odyssey is a fantastic game, but a shitty Mario game, it should get lower scores...?
BOTW got 40/40 from them and yet it had a 98 (and eventually, a 97) from Metacritic. Pretty sure its indicative of Mario having 90-95 range on there.
I think it will hover around the 94-95 range on Metacritic (definitely not a 98... or 97 actually that BOTW had there).
I love BOTW, but a 97 it is not. A 90 mostly. A great open-world game, but a shitty Zelda game. Even though I agree with all of the criticisms of it, I still wouldn't give it less than 90.
Mario seems poised to not repeat the same mistake and depart so significantly from the template.
Not the person you're quoting but yes and no
If FIFA started allowing you to pick up the ball and put it in the net like basketball I'd expect it to get crappy scores even if the game is actually good in its own right
I think Odyssey is still sticking to the template and not straying far from it like BOTW did. I generally think BOTW is a great game, but I still agree with all of the criticisms of it in this article: https://www.destructoid.com/breaking-down-why-breath-of-the-wild-is-highly-overrated-452329.phtml
We will see if Odyssey will follow a similar trajectory but I highly doubt it.
Not to derail this thread as its supposed to be about Odyssey. But when you link an article about BoTW and one of the first sentences is that the game lacks charm or character, I start to doubt the journalist actually played the game at all.
Just checking, disregard if I'm off base here, but do you not know how review aggregates work? Your less than 90 score likely would not have changed the MC score. It would still be 97 if you scored it 8/10 or whatever. It's a collection of nearly 100 different opinions, and you're asserting that yours outweighs all of them.