Autoignition
Member
I'm not fragile in the least sorry to burst your little bubble. And delicious, do you seriously talk like that in real life?
I'm almost afraid to keep talking to you because porcelain dolls are not meant to be played with.
I'm not fragile in the least sorry to burst your little bubble. And delicious, do you seriously talk like that in real life?
I'm almost afraid to keep talking to you because porcelain dolls are not meant to be played with.
Well the good thing is you don't have to because I have absolutely nothing to say to you, I just called you out on your ridiculous comment and you've ignored everything I've said. Its embarassing.
I'm sorry if I cracked your porcelain skin and touched on the very sensitive, tender area that isn't wholly comfortable with acknowledging your own personal role in the strife of other people in this world, snowflake.
Well the good thing is you don't have to because I have absolutely nothing to say to you, I just called you out on your ridiculous comment and you've ignored everything I've said. Its embarassing.
You are fragile though. The comment was directed at posters who actually posted something in the thread. You took offense to someone pointing out white fragility could exist within this thread aka fragile.
I took offense with how it was presented. I also take offense with that individual judging me without knowing one thing about me. I find the whole situation to be comical.
So it has to be presented to me specifically to have an opinion on his delivery?
I took offense with how it was presented. I also take offense with that individual judging me without knowing one thing about me. I find the whole situation to be comical.
If you're going to form an opinion on how police violence manifests (differently), you should maybe know something about it, yes.So you need to have committed an act of police violence or known someone who has to comment on it? You don't have to be implicated in something to have an opinion on it.
Let it go, some people just want to hate on white males and there is no talking them out of it.
I'm not fragile in the least sorry to burst your little bubble. And delicious, do you seriously talk like that in real life?
And MY privileged position? Do you know me or anything about me? Sorry but I had to bust my ass for everything I've ever earned.
If your knee-jerk reaction to being told that you have an advantage in life that others don't have is to become extremely defensive and lash out against people who are regularly left in the dust and more often than not actively hurt thanks to your privileged position, I have every right to sip some motherfuckin tea.
Stay fragile, my friend.
Again this is NOT the issue here.
It was a presentation to make aware of a problem. It was not some internet talk. But I would love you trying this in a real life presentation when someone does not agree or does not understand your point.
How hard is it to understand that you CAN NOT do it in a profesional field
PS: It is always eaier to blame others for the problems in life. Victimhood is a reall problem these days.
The Culture of Victimhood
Let it go, some people just want to hate on white males and there is no talking them out of it.
snowflake.
White male privilege presentations are done in real life, and that's what Donald Trump is the definition of. The problem is that you're calling victim mentality in the face of facts about transgender arrests. Takes a fool to do that.
This was not such a presentation. This was to make aware of the problem within the police. And by using these phrases she did a pretty good job of people thnking you are nuts and not worth listening to.
Further more she did it so silence people who did not agree or did not understand what she was talking about.
This was not such a presentation. This was to make aware of the problem within the police. And by using these phrases she did a pretty good job of people thnking you are nuts and not worth listening to.
Further more she did it so silence people who did not agree or did not understand what she was talking about.
Hmmm soo we can't solve the problems that minorities and women face if we actually talk about them because that would hurt white males feelings.
Oh well!
Hmmm soo we can't solve the problems that minorities and women face if we actually talk about them because that would hurt white males feelings.
Oh well!
no one ever said that. But to use this phrase to shut someone down because you have no argument is not only stupid but also will stop your progress or point you want to make
If you only argument is white male privilege maybe you should do more research before trying to talk about such a topic.
People did ridicule him in this thread.I think she used the term "white male privilege" because it was a white male implying that because he hadn't personally experienced something, any stats, analysis, studies, or facts could be thrown out of the window or called into question. That his personal experience trumped all reality and that this was strong counter-evidence.
Generally, you would need to support your argument with something in the face of such overwhelming evidence. I think the idea that well I didn't see it so it can't possibly have happened is a privileged statement to make unless you're omnipotent and you literally see everything that happens everywhere.
Can someone explain how I didn't see it therefore you're making this up or your research is crazy incorrect is rational? So much of the focus is on the WMP term that I feel people are totally overlooking that this guy was not a scientist, he had done no research into the issue on his own, but felt that his personal experience made him enough of an expert to shoot down facts and science without him having to do any amount of research on the issue. That's definitely an arrogant or privileged stance to take imo.
That isn't what I was asking, dude.If you're going to form an opinion on how police violence manifests (differently), you should maybe know something about it, yes.
Why is acknowledging privaledge such a big deal?
Because apparently if I was in the same room as a billionaire who happened to be black, as a poor white guy Id automatically be the priveledged one.... or summats.
I suppose it all makes a great deal of sense in academia but in the real world all this kind of stuff seems to do is get everyone nice and comfortable in their respective trenches.
People are allowed their uninformed opinions, yes.That isn't what I was asking, dude.
I refuse to recognize and privilege you think I have due to shallow meaningless physical features. How does that make you feel?
And how does that effect you?
Priviledge does not equal success. It just makes it easier.Well that's circular logic. What is my privilege if not power?
Lol, you don't understand how it works at all.
Correct.I agree that she shouldn't have dismissed his point of view solely because of his sex and gender. Instead, she should have invited him to consider that being male and white insulates him from having to experience the realities that a disadvantaged minority has to face, which is a form of privilege.
His worldly thought process completely revolves around whether or not he and people in his circle have experienced it.
Not only is that lunacy, but it's quite of privilege to be able to function thinking like that. She's 100% right, and his sensitivity and barking resulting in her suspension proves her point.
Isn't it the case for most people that their thought process revolves around their own experience? What do you believe that goes against your own lived experience?
I dont understand your question. Why would I only be able to understand/acknowledge what I experience? Doubly so if it's measured, and then presented to me. The world doesn't evlove around me, it doesn't move only when I do o.o
So you never question statistics, even if they don't match up with your life experiences?
If I was at that presentation, I wouldn't question those statistics as they're presented.
But in general, there are many factors like who are the statistics from, what are they trying to analyze and conclude, how did they collect the data, etc.
But those are statistics, it's different than life experiences, and you have to look at it scientifically.
Like of someone said "the average credit card debt is $15,000 and here's why", I wouldn't write it off as "irresponsible fools" because I'm credit card debt free.
Me said:100% right to be racist and sexist? Do you think racism and sexism are ok, sometimes?
So you pick and choose the statistics you think are true too. Moving on, you missed a question (or you ignored it) so I will ask again.
You said that what she said was 100% right and I asked:
You don't pick and choose. And business statistics are different from studies, etc. Context.
White Male Privilege is neither sexist nor racist. And it's measured, not based on feels.