• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[Digital Foundry] COD Black Ops Cold War: PS5 vs Xbox Series X - Ray Tracing, 120Hz Mode Tests + Series S Analysis!

yurqqa

Member
Is it just me or are these DF videos 1080p with youtube uglyness?

You can always support DF on Patreon and get the access to the high-quality videos download.

Though judging from these threads, most of the people will support DF on Wednesday just to unsubscribe on Friday when the next review will be published. And then next Tuesday they'll support DF wholeheartedly again.

It's just obvious from this video that John tries to be very careful with the wording as he gets a ton of shite ion the comments from saying the one of the console is performing 0,7% better,
There are lots of sad angry people out there.
 
Last edited:

assurdum

Banned
Those of you saying 120hz at practically 1080p resolutions that only 1% of the people who bought it can play at need to give your head a shake. The vast majority of the players on the market either don't have a 120hz tv or don't care, or prefer 60hz at full resolution/rt. Were talking 99% here.
I don't understand. So doesn't count if ps5 outperformed series X in some mode? Just counts when series X outperformed ps5 in selective scene at 60 fps? Because seems the perfect resume of the whole thread narrative about the series X "superiority".
 
Last edited:
You can always support DF on Patreon and get the access to the high-quality videos download.

Though judging from these threads, most of the people will support DF on Wednesday just to unsubscribe on Friday when the next review will be published. And then next Tuesday they'll support DF wholeheartedly again.

It's just obvious from this video that John tries to be very careful with the wording as he gets a ton of shite ion the comments from saying the one of the console is performing 0,7% better,
There are lots of sad angry people out there.

I already pay YouTube premium for no ads and they advertise in the video with a sponsor. Now I need to pay them directly too? 🚫
 

thelastword

Banned
The XSX runs better in the mode which 95%+ of gamers will use and it feels better in 120hz mode if you have VRR. Overall a slight win.

I gotta say I'm impressed with the devs here, such a gorgeous game and it runs almost flawlessly.
With the frequency I've been seeing VRR mentioned of late in DF videos and on forums...It seems that every XBOX ships with a VRR TV...I should probably get in on this...
If Digtal foundry are MS shills then VG tech are the PlayStation version...except lower budget
Except stats don't shill, opinions do........
 

assurdum

Banned
If Digtal foundry are MS shills then VG tech are the PlayStation version...except lower budget
You can't be serious. VGtech reported every details possible , he never supported Sony, he always pointed out multiplat difference in both side if he could, even when Xbox uses higher setting it's the only who spotted it, which is not totally in his competency .
 
Last edited:
I also pay for the internet and when I order meals online I have to pay for them too.

It's UNFAIR !!!

Be a passive aggressive toddler. That's fine too. I made a comment that the videos look shit in 1080p. My point stands. I just won't watch any more of their content. You win.
 

longdi

Banned
Wait, so some of you here are now championing Vgtech over DF? Who are the guys behind vgtech, why I have little impression of them?
 

yurqqa

Member
Poor analogy. DF get a cut of the YT premium fee. Plus, they have an in-video ad which also brings them revenue. Not quite the same.
And you can watch their videos on Youtube with the quality Youtube provides.

If you want the videos as a separate files without YouTube compression artifacts, you can also obtain them (not through YouTube, but directly from DF), but you have to contribute to DF for the work they are doing.
Is it really unfair ?

You can also write an e-mail to YouTube about the poor quality of the videos and wait for them to do something about it. As a long-term strategy.
 

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
I don't understand. So doesn't count if ps5 outperformed series X in some mode? Just counts when series X outperformed ps5 in selective scene at 60 fps? Because seems the perfect resume of the whole thread narrative about the series X "superiority".

Seems equally silly to base performance on a mode that most won't play in. Most players will play at 60hz with rt, therefore its clearly the more important on the 2 by a landslide.
 

assurdum

Banned
Seems equally silly to base performance on a mode that most won't play in. Most players will play at 60hz with rt, therefore its clearly the more important on the 2 by a landslide.
Seems equally silly report VRR give an advantage on series X because most won't have a TV with VRR but obviously it's not in this case and we know why.
 
Last edited:

longdi

Banned
According to VG Tech, this drop is random on the PlayStation 5.

EteydWB.png
jrYcLre.png

I wonder if DF did their tests before or after ps5 first patch?

I assume Vgtech tests was done earlier, I recall seeing them, so their ps5 is unpatched.

This could clue us on what 'stability' patch sony rolled out 🤷‍♀️
 

Traxtech

Member
I just played that same area and there was definitely no fps drops as im very prone to noticing them coming from a pc background.

Also in saying that, my house mate played this area in his xsx probably an hour or so after me and it was flawless on his end too

120 vrr on xsx is the real deal BTW, I'm jealous as a PS5 owner
 

assurdum

Banned
According to VG Tech, this drop is random on the PlayStation 5.

EteydWB.png
jrYcLre.png
This guy is a godsend. I suspected such leaps on ps5 weren't "regular" at all. And obviously DF was unable to spot in because they are too focused to push the Xbox powerness narrative for such performance difference. Typical.
 
Last edited:

MrFunSocks

Banned
Seems equally silly report VRR give an advantage on series X because most won't have a TV with VRR but obviously it's not in this case and we know why.
Most playing at 120hz will likely have a VRR tv, in which case the xbox version will be the best version.

For those that don't have a 120hz tv, well the xbox version is the best at 60hz too.
 
Most playing at 120hz will likely have a VRR tv, in which case the xbox version will be the best version.

For those that don't have a 120hz tv, well the xbox version is the best at 60hz too.

Playing games at 120 on a 60hz tv is still a smoother experience, especially if you have stuff like freesync/gsync. This idea that 120 isn't worth anyone's time is as annoying as the idea that most people don't have 120hz tvs, I got a 120hz TV for under 300 bucks dude. Framerate is always king especially in competitive modes.
 

longdi

Banned
If a patch hurts FPS a future patch could also fix it.
Depends on the patch purpose.
Was talking about sony firmware update here. Could it be because of the graphics artefacts being reported by ps5 users, sony sent a hotfix update. And that affected DF cod results vs vgtech pre-patch.

Can someone dm D dark10x which firmware his ps5 is on while doing this tests?
 
Last edited:

MrFunSocks

Banned
Of course team blue are waiting for NXGamer's "technical analysis" because DF didn't give the results they wanted lol. DF are far more qualified and go far more in depth along with having actual industry contacts to talk to about issues and performance. They just don't make 2 dozen pro sony videos per xbox video though, so they're "xbox shills" lol.
 
Last edited:
Depends on the patch purpose.
Was talking about sony firmware update here. Could it out because of the graphics artefacts being reported by ps5 users. And that affected DF cod results vs vgtech pre-patch.

Can someone dm @Dark1x which firmware his ps5 is on while doing this tests?

I thought we were talking a patch for the game in specific. Guess I'll need receipts.
 
Of course are waiting for NXGamer's "technical analysis" because DF didn't give the results they wanted lol. DF are far more qualified and go far more in depth along with having actual industry contacts to talk to about issues and performance. They just don't make 2 dozen pro sony videos per xbox video though, so they're "xbox shills" lol.

The people throwing shade at DF are bad but you're no better with how you talk about NXGamer NXGamer .
 

assurdum

Banned
I am so confused, so Sony was supposedly winning in performance, now Series X is?
Both hardware are too close to overtake in a single way. Sometimes ps5 could win other times series X . Anyway ps5 performance on RT mode has bizzarre issues. I have heard series X too has a sort of similar problem by some users .
 

assurdum

Banned
The people throwing shade at DF are bad but you're no better with how you talk about NXGamer NXGamer .
DF typically ignore performance issue on playstation hardware and it's all about to be less powerful, if someone yet are still in denial needs to recheck what VGtech has reported in his analysis about fps problem on ps5. At least him or NXgamer try to spot in more stuff in deep on playstation when such things happen, differently to DF.
 
Last edited:
Ok so I've played this game extensively on PS5 across every chapter multiple times(played on Veteran, so have died multiple times across major points like set piece moments). As John and Tom point out the PS5 version did to 40s for a brief few seconds and immediately recuperated during that internal shoot out set piece moment(the mission where Woods and Bell are sent to a russian powerplant type facility in the night). Also there's a side mission near mexico, this one dipped during the cinematic intro to gameplay transition. But upon restarting from checkpoint the frame rate no longer dipped. Also I have to say in these specific moments frame rate dips and it immediately recuperates back to 60fps in a second or two. Very solid offering on PS5.
 
Last edited:
Also I have to point out the initial Arash Kadivar in turkey airstrip sequence where Woods reloads and Bell cleans his knife, i didn't run into fps drop in this scene as seen in DF. may be it's a random thing? Also I played the game before the stability patch and after the stability patch
 

assurdum

Banned
Ok so I've played this game extensively on PS5 across every chapter multiple times(played on Veteran, so have died multiple times across major points like set piece moments). As John and Alex point out the PS5 version did to 40s for a brief few seconds and immediately recuperated during that internal shoot out set piece moment(the mission where Woods and Bell are sent to a russian powerplant type facility in the night). Also there's a side mission near mexico, this one dipped during the cinematic intro to gameplay transition. But upon restarting from checkpoint the frame rate no longer dipped. Also I have to say in these specific moments frame rate dips and it immediately recuperates back to 60fps in a second or two. Very solid offering on PS5.
It's not Alex. It's the other less known. And less competent if I can say. I'm not a fan of Dictator but I give the credit who merits. He is more parsimonious in his analysis and I suspect would be more capable to recognise bizzarre stuff in perfomance. This Tom, if I recall correctly, he is not new to be very approximative and in fact is reported such stuff as performance gap in ps5 (in John defence he seems just to supervise him, at least looking how talks to him in the video) ; the FPS spike seen in such situations smell more of missteps in the coding than hardware gap between the two console.
 
Last edited:
It's not Alex. It's the other less known. And less competent if I can say. I'm not a fan of Dictator but I give the credit who merits. He is more parsimonious in his analysis and I suspect would be more capable to recognise bizzarre stuff in perfomance. This Tom, if I recall correctly, he is not new to be very approximative and in fact has reported performance issue on ps5 as performance disadvantages compared the series X which probably are not; the FPS spike seen in such situations smell more of missteps in the coding than hardware gap between the two console.

Ah right, I meant to say Tom!
 

GenericUser

Member
Does the PS5 only drop in cutscenes and only in SP, or does this happen in multiplayer too?
Can we PS5 players (I hope I will be one soon) just deactivate the RT stuff to get a smoother framerate?
 

assurdum

Banned
Does the PS5 only drop in cutscenes and only in SP, or does this happen in multiplayer too?
Can we PS5 players (I hope I will be one soon) just deactivate the RT stuff to get a smoother framerate?
Sure. But such drops shouldn't happen. It seems before the last patch, RT mode hadn't such fps spike in SP campaign (VGtech source).
 

GenericUser

Member
Oh, that's not good then. I can deal with drops in singleplayer (because, who cares) but multiplayer needs locked 60fps. Hmm, maybe they'll release a patch that improves the performance.

assurdum said:
Sure. But such drops shouldn't happen. It seems before the last patch, RT mode hadn't such fps spike in SP campaign (VGtech source).
So I can just deactivate RT and I'm good? That is good enough for me, I don't need RT, just gimme the 60fps and I'm good.
 
Last edited:

iamvin22

Industry Verified
This guy is a godsend. I suspected such leaps on ps5 weren't "regular" at all. And obviously DF was unable to spot in because they are too focused to push the Xbox powerness narrative for such performance difference. Typical.

ooorrrrrr they did the comparison before the system and game patch, just sayin.
 

MastaKiiLA

Member
Given that the XSX seems to hold steady in the RT cutscenes, I'll give it the nod in the comparison. Both seem to hold steady during RT gameplay. While the PS5 continues to excel at the 120Hz mode in yet another comparison, I'm not certain that's a mode many gamers can/will be able to use. I certainly can't as my TV seems to have a 100Hz max refresh. So for usable modes, seems like the XSX has the edge.

I do find it interesting that the PS5 seems to excel during what I believe to be CPU-limited situations. Cutscenes should be GPU-limited, but as your framerate increases, the CPU should start playing a bigger role with the increased number of frames that need physics, AI, and other controlled elements. If my assumption is correct, I wonder if we'll see first party studios leveraging that strong performance for enhanced world simulation, beyond just a graphical bump.

Fans of this franchise should be happy with either console version. Neither box performs poorly, and they both appear to have identical visual settings. I'm unable to watch the full video on my TV, so just skimmed the performance sections on my laptop. I didn't notice any of the noticeable tearing that VGT captured in his video. Was there any mention of that by DF? Also, there was no side-by-side for the RT mode, and only 2 short clips where the PS5 dips. Did they mention that this was consistent behavior from the PS5 in cutscenes? VGT had a few custscenes in both 60 and 120 modes, but there weren't any dips like seen in the DF video.

I kinda prefer VGT thus far for video comparisons, over NXG and DF. I think the spreadsheet supplement is absolutely brilliant, and helps to quantify what the eye can often miss. DF is slipping down the ladder as far as preferred tech analysis is concerned. I find VGT's voiceless side-by-sides to be the best, with NXG's more technical analysis second-best afterwards. Between encoding issues by YT, and excessive opinionating by their staff, DF is losing some of its luster for me. I only started following any of these channels in the past few months, so I don't know what the norm is.
 

assurdum

Banned
ooorrrrrr they did the comparison before the system and game patch, just sayin.
You know, when perfomance takes a hit in particular conditions theorically you try to discover the reason behind, if it's really a tech analysis what you want to do. But they seen performance it's fine on series X, so ps5 hardware is the fault . If you don't see a preconception behind this attitude I don't know what else to say. And it shows how gossip their analysis can be, when the people behind change.
 
Last edited:

sinnergy

Member
You only needed to win one game each year ! And that’s COD, well done MS and Xbox ! Million seller right here . I was waiting for the best version before buying , sale +1.
 
Because the times where PS5 drops frame are scripted and no gameplay like the multiplayer mode, where the 120fps mode is consistent, no matter if scripted or not, and in multiplayer it will be noticeable.
PS5 is using Vsync on COD,when the framerate and refresh are not both 60 you get dropped frames,when does the framerate drop below 60?During cutscenes,most cutscenes run at half of framerate of gameplay.Xbox is using VRR in DF video.
 
Top Bottom