apocalidiot
Banned
This part of the debate was the funniest fucking thing I've ever seen
Yup, I agree that this is the philosophy of the left. Thanks for owning up to it.
Anyway, what channel should I watch for this stuff guys? I want something more neutral. BBC doesn't cover it enough.
Fox - right wing propaganda
CNN - slanting right
MSNBC - left wing
Sky - right wing Murdoch owned
So what's left, what's good?
Oh man that MSNBC focus group. The SNL parody of the undecided voter is no parody, it's fact.
Obama really needs to bust out that the only reason Romney has this number placed at 12 million is because that's the CBO projection with the current (Obama) policies. If Romney is elected he wants to trick people into thinking that the number he did nothing to earn is the result of his hard work.
That was insane. I honestly don't know how they go through life if this is their thought process. "He didn't answer the question. Maybe he'll answer it next time! That's why I'm still undecided..." ugh
No PBS over here in the UK
Even on satellite.
Oh man that MSNBC focus group. The SNL parody of the undecided voter is no parody, it's fact.
CNBC is a business channel which will always lean Republican. Al jazeera is very good
Oh man that MSNBC focus group. The SNL parody of the undecided voter is no parody, it's fact.
Yup, I agree that this is the philosophy of the left. Thanks for owning up to it.
Fucking Murdoch lol. Should have known he'd jam up his satellite options with right leaning outlets (semi sarcastic). I don't even have MSNBC on here any more for a slight humorous counter balance to FOX. Fuck.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjVABCcAgYY&feature=plcpI missed it, is the debate archived?
Well, how will Romney create 12 million jobs with none of those jobs being government jobs?
Just giving tax cuts to businesses and the wealthy doesnt work since it doesnt stimulate demand. Companies are sitting on record profits and a butt-load of cash, but arent creating jobs since there is a lack of demand. How does giving them more money fix this problem?
Companies arent going to create jobs for the hell of it just because they will now have more money on hand. It has to make financial sense for them to do it
what do you think they'll do if their taxes are raised? How do they save that money? The same way they always do; layoffs, higher prices.
Murdoch is not going to be able to sway the American electorate forever. It's time for new life to come to news.
Since you seem reasonable;
He doesn't "say" he wants to cut taxes for just the wealthy, even if that's GAF's take. He says for everyone. Everyone gets to keep more of their money, which they will spend (or invest, which is also, y'know, a good thing).
I'm actually an undecided voterdo I vote for Obama or Stein in Texas
I'm actually an undecided voterdo I vote for Obama or Stein in Texas
You can't cut taxes for everyone and keep it revenue neutral. It just isn't possible, someone will have to pay more.
You can if the economy grows, and if you cut spending
Another nonsensequivalence from another strawman I see! Harumph! They will only use those breaks in their taxes to buy more boats! And we know Chinese robots build and sell those! Then they're going to burn their boats to contribute to the greenhouse effect to try and drown the poor! Then it will be easy for them to finish their war on women! What a bunch of assholes!
You can if the economy grows, and if you cut spending (not that I think Romney will do the latter, but a man can dream).
We all have equal tax breaks in God's eyes.Guys. GUYS. Please stop fighting. "We are all God's children".
Since you seem reasonable;
He doesn't "say" he wants to cut taxes for just the wealthy, even if that's GAF's take. He says for everyone. Everyone gets to keep more of their money, which they will spend (or invest, which is also, y'know, a good thing).
Second, if you realize that companies are always just looking to make money (you're right), then what do you think they'll do if their taxes are raised? How do they save that money? The same way they always do; layoffs, higher prices.
You can if the economy grows, and if you cut spending (not that I think Romney will do the latter, but a man can dream).
Since you seem reasonable;
He doesn't "say" he wants to cut taxes for just the wealthy, even if that's GAF's take. He says for everyone. Everyone gets to keep more of their money, which they will spend (or invest, which is also, y'know, a good thing).
Second, if you realize that companies are always just looking to make money (you're right), then what do you think they'll do if their taxes are raised? How do they save that money? The same way they always do; layoffs, higher prices. In many forms, such as less full-time employees and more part-time workers (and now, with Obamacare, there's another incentive to do so if they want to avoid the costs of paying for someone's health care), more out-sourcing, hidden costs, and every other trick they ALWAYS use.
You can if the economy grows, and if you cut spending (not that I think Romney will do the latter, but a man can dream).
Don't companies pay income taxes on profits? If they do things to cut costs won't that increase their profits so that they end up paying more taxes?
Guys. GUYS. Please stop fighting. "We are all God's children".
You can if the economy grows, and if you cut spending (not that I think Romney will do the latter, but a man can dream).
The private sector, like everyone else, has had the Bush tax cuts for the past 10 years.You can if the economy grows, and if you cut spending (not that I think Romney will do the latter, but a man can dream).
Are there any Atheists voting for Romney?
They both ran over a lot -- one comment by Romney in particular was about twice as long as his two minutes. I also think that Romney looked like he got screwed out of comments because he kept DEMANDING MORE COMMENTS. Obama got shut down once and he just said "okay" and let it go. Romney has demonstrated his inability to do that basic social interaction in this setting. I don't think it looked good. I could be biased.
How does government not create jobs when government workers get their checks signed by the government?
I'm guessing government jobs don't count as "real" jobs.
I just can't, what?
I think the undecided's they put on TV are fake actors/actresses just put there to make dumb people feel like they're not so dumb after all.