• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Square's Ian Livingstone talks next-gen; hints at always-on, used game-blocking Xbox

Meelow

Banned
EA was not there for Sony event, today Sony removed Criterion from their list of devs working on PS4. Could it be that EA is the publisher pushing for this? Could sony lose FIFA, Madden, etc?

I still don't think MS will do it, but they are the ones that can get away with it...

If that was true, than my theory was correct.

Both Nintendo and Sony not doing what EA wants and Microsoft does so EA gives both of them not so great support and gives Microsoft an "unprecedented partnership"

Guess we'll have to see.
 

Hoo-doo

Banned
Wouldn't be so sure about that. I don't have a hard time imagining hearing Brad Shoemaker making a case for it on the Giant Bombcast 6 months from now...

Hah, that's exactly who I pictured in my head trying to spin this as a positive just because he has to play games for a living.
 

Drek

Member
I feel like MS can somehow turn this into a positive by saying: "and now with the Durango your retail copy will act like software for the PC...just install and you'll never have to swap discs again. Gone are the days of multi disc releases!"

Or maybe they'll bury it in a spec sheet...I'm not really sure. How will they announce this? (I was kinda surprised that Sony just put out "no BC" in the conference like that. I don't see MS doing the same with used games.)

No way Durango comes with enough local storage to install entire blu-ray discs onto it with any real quantity.

Yeah the recent PS4 comments kind of left that door open too, even though they said there wouldn't be a system level block.

To me there's really not a lot of difference since if given that option I'm sure most publishers would take it.
Sony has said it doesn't need to be online at all, ever, so that indicates no disc based watermarking in effect, at least not the kind that needs online activation.

I'd bet Sony is offering an expanded version of their online play codes model for publishers to opt in, ensuring they don't have to provide online service to gamers who buy used if they don't want to.

Will you guys not buy a xbox 720 if it's the only console with EA, well I think WiiU would have it(?), just not PS4 since it disobeyed EA.
EA is not an 800 pound gorilla anymore. Madden is in sales decline, FIFA is only just this generation re-establishing itself and in constant jeopardy of giving that mark back to Winning Eleven/Pro Evo, and 2K makes the basketball games now, and Sony makes the best baseball game. EA Sports has seen it's market clout gutted due to EA's own actions (Madden exclusivity). The rest of their library has never had system seller clout.

Activision Blizzard could maybe be a threat due to CoD, Destiny, etc.. But they had two different announcements at Sony's show, Diablo III and Destiny as a day and date PS4 release with exclusive content.

Even Take 2/Rockstar with GTA doesn't have that much play as GTA4 is viewed with mediocre hindsight and they've been slow to follow it up. GTA5 is a PS3/360 title meaning the next GTA game on the new gen consoles is several years away, too late to change market landscape.

There is basically no 3rd party "reward" MS could have lined up to nullify the damage this would do to them.
 

Linkified

Member
Mmmm...it could be a possible publisher decision, seems Sony is taking the same approach...

GameSpot asked Sony Worldwide Studios boss Shuhei Yoshida in a quickfire Q&A not if PS4 would block used games but whether second hand games will require an activation code on the console.

His answer: “It's a publisher decision. We are not talking about it. Sorry

Link
 

Takuya

Banned
Did any first party MS games have online passes this generation? I know Sony and EA were the driving forces behind that initiative but I honestly can't remember if MS joined them or not. I think it's relevant to this discussion as well.

No because you're already paying your online pass in XBOXLive GOLD.
 
I don't get why you need to force it on every dev. If a dev doesn't want their games to be sold used, just release it as a digital-only title.

If they implement all that crap into Durango but sell it at $299, will people buy it?

If they have third party support for these changes, they'll have all the ammo they need to do it. And consumers will go where the strongest support is.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
No honestly I dont, why would a thirdparty know about a company's next generation policy's outside of the dev kits they received. I'm assuming he's also under NDA, if he was for sure of the policy he wouldn't have used the word Supposedly sounds like hearsay. I'm sure all of this will be discussed at MS meeting next month

"Supposedly" is a nice word used by people who don't want to break NDA. I think it's crazy to believe this guy didn't have devs involved in those closed-door meetings.
 

iLLmAtlc

Member
Like I was saying during the ps4 rumours I don't think any console manifacturer is stupid enough to bear the full weight of the used games crusade alone. It's either they are all on board or none.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
All they have to do is wait. IMO next gen will have much more digital download, and the gen after probably won't even have an optical drive.

Perhaps they expect it to be accepted (or at least very little reaction)
 
I doubt this will be the gen that we see it, but we will see it at some point. The move to all-digital will be a big step in that direction.
 
All they have to do is wait. IMO next gen will have much more digital download, and the gen after probably won't even have an optical drive.

Perhaps they expect it to be accepted (or at least very little reaction)

They took a risk dumping all support for dial-up at the start of this gen. People said they'd suffer for it. They didn't. Hard to read consumers sometimes. I personally don't think used games will matter to the masses. Sure matters to me though.

There would be no positives at all for MS if they do this, so why would they?

I can see the benefits for them. I just can't see what they'll claim the benefits for me are.
 

Biggzy

Member
in a eurogamer interview they said that patent had nothing to do with the PS4.

Yeah I know, although I don't believe Sony for one minute there, but I am not interested about that. I was merely commentating that what Livingston said sounds similar to that Patent.
 

Fistwell

Member
Criterion have been removed from the dev list? WTF?!
Temporarily. What I understood is: supposedly, Criterion disobeyed PS4 PS4 disobeyed EA? Something.

Expand on that?
Here you go.

What are you referring to?
PS4 disobeyed EA wat?
I meant if the suggestions were true. Criterion being removed from PS4 supporters, EA being absent from PS4 event (though I doubt that have anything to do with their support since the EA logo was on their supporters picture). I picked EA since they seemed like one of the companies that supports no used games, and may have been one of the groups to try to influence Microsoft to consider it.
 

ascii42

Member
They took a risk dumping all support for dial-up at the start of this gen. People said they'd suffer for it. They didn't. Hard to read consumers sometimes. I personally don't think used games will matter to the masses. Sure matters to me though.

The original XBOX didn't support dial-up either (well, technically it was possible).
 

kitsuneyo

Member
Are the rumors that discs would be tied to the console or the profile?

If the discs are tied to a console then we have a Wii U type download situation. What if your Xbox breaks and you have to buy a new one - none of your games will work anymore.

This move would also damage the second hand system market. If you decide to sell your Xbox, all your games basically have to go in the trash. Not very appealing.
 

ascii42

Member
If the discs are tied to a console then we have a Wii U type download situation. What if your Xbox breaks and you have to buy a new one - none of your games will work anymore.

This move would also damage the second hand system market. If you decide to sell your Xbox, all your games basically have to go in the trash. Not very appealing.

If they are tied to the console, then when you sell the console, they get your games as well.
 

kinggroin

Banned
I have a bad feeling that Microsoft has a few major third party games on lock down that, along with a very competitive price and strong ecosystem loyalty, will validate their decision to follow through on these rumours with great sales.

I hope not.


But I do, because I'm incredibly selfish and don't want to have to buy another platform thats nearly identical to one I already own.

But I hope not.
 

Protome

Member
I don't get why you need to force it on every dev. If a dev doesn't want their games to be sold used, just release it as a digital-only title.



If they have third party support for these changes, they'll have all the ammo they need to do it. And consumers will go where the strongest support is.

Not in the UK. We're still technically in recession, people can't afford games. Killing the used market without significantly decreasing the prices of games will cause the next xbox to fail.
 
Didn't sony say pretty much the same thing tho? The future is Disc based not because Sony wants it to be but because the infrastructure needed to support DD only consoles isn't a reality yet.

This. There's no way i would be able to use Steam as much as i do and download big releases if i had to rely on my home connection alone.

If games are going to go bigger and flashier then there will be a lot more data required and in most of the world it would not be feasible to download 30GB+ say, not in a timely manner anyway. DD is fine for smaller games for most of us but my big games are bought on disk whenever possible.

That may change in the next 5-10 years but MS may decide that those of us without big internet aren't worth bothering with. I'd put money on it being the reason MS and Sony are both looking heavily at cloud services and streaming at the moment. Not for the upcoming consoles but maybe the next.

Didn't Sony say they were going to leave it to the publishers to decide whether to implement the Sony used games system or not on Playstation 4 releases?
 
If the discs are tied to a console then we have a Wii U type download situation. What if your Xbox breaks and you have to buy a new one - none of your games will work anymore.

It would be the same as they do with Xbox360 now -- games are tied to both the account AND the console. If you switch consoles the game license gets shifted. It won't be an issue there.
 

Ploid 3.0

Member
Always online would be messed up because a lot of people play their consoles in places that don't have easy access to the internet, like military bases where they wind down and try to find entertainment.
 

Shadow780

Member
I think it's possible they'll do it, and the masses won't care in the long run, despite initial opposition from the core.

If all they need is to authenticate discs they can put in a 3G chip like Kindle just for authentication purposes and not full-on internet.
 
EA was not there for Sony event, today Sony removed Criterion from their list of devs working on PS4. Could it be that EA is the publisher pushing for this? Could sony lose FIFA, Madden, etc?

I still don't think MS will do it, but they are the ones that can get away with it...

I think FIFA, Madden has to be released on every viable platform due to contracts. Sony could lose Battlefield, Mass Effect, Dead Space,
Fuse
, etc though.

I heard Sony's way to combat second hand used game is an activation fee akin to online passes that would work even if the console never goes online, I'm not sure how that's achievable but that's what I heard. So basically if you buy a game used from gamestop and goes to put it on your PS4, the system will ask you to go to PSN and pay 10 bucks to activate the game, sony keeps 30%, publisher gets 70%. I'm not sure publishers would want this as you don't get as much as you would from a brand new copy of the game.

If these rumors are to be believed, it seems that the 720 just blocks the used game, might make someone like Kottick happy.

If PS4 allows used games and 720 blocks them, but 720 gets Battlefield 4, GTA VI, and COD 2013 exclusively, I'm not sure MS is going to be losing this battle, matter of fact, I think they would be winning.
 
Not in the UK. We're still technically in recession, people can't afford games. Killing the used market without significantly decreasing the prices of games will cause the next xbox to fail.

It won't kill the Xbox. It might signal a huge shift in people's decision making when they buy a cross-platform game though. If it's a game I know I'll want for years, I'll buy it digitally. If it's merely a one-and-done, I'm going with the version I can sell/trade.
 

Willy Wanka

my god this avatar owns
No because you're already paying your online pass in XBOXLive GOLD.

That actually makes sense. What doesn't make sense is the current perception that EA & Sony embrace the used game market when their actions from this generation suggest otherwise.
 

Hindle

Banned
They would serious 3rd party support to do this.

It could add incentive for an exclusive game from each publisher
 
Let's be realistic. If somehow MS went forward with this, third parties would definitely put it on PS4 as well. It wouldn't be system wide like with MS but still pretty much the same thing.

Doubtful. I don't think devs are crying for the end of used games. They just want a piece of the pie which is why they started the online pass. This is just another way for MS to cash in on the used game business.

If MS started a "used game pass" would they even need to split it with devs? They might give a few dollars to save face, but MS can easily pocket $10-$15 with every used game. That's if this idea doesn't completely back fire on them which i hope it does.
 

Takuya

Banned
That actually makes sense. What doesn't make sense is the current perception that EA & Sony embrace the used game market when their actions from this generation suggest otherwise.

Sony doesn't use peer-to-peer generally for it's online network (like MS does) so there is that additional cost to them, so charging online passes makes sense for them that way. They do not block you from playing your single player experience (if bought used), but if you want to go online and use their servers, you'll unlock that with a pass.
 

Argyle

Member
For those with some technical know-how, is it possible to watermark discs and make unusable in the way he's suggesting? From my limited experience, watermarks usually impact the picture or audio when illegally ripped from a blu-ray. It's often audio, although I may be wrong.

The "watermark" is probably a unique serial number in the header of the disc, it doesn't affect the game data.

Sony is already using this (is it already in the normal Blu-ray spec?) - pretty sure this is how "Cross-buy" works when you buy a PS3 game with a free digital copy of the Vita version. The disc has a unique ID burned onto it somewhere and you can activate and redeem it once, but after it's been activated, that disc can't be used to get another digital copy.
 

Oersted

Member
I just can't see them doing this after Sony is doing none of those things.

It looks like used games on PS4 are getting behind a paywall. And Sony is going to try to push streaming, which means you have to be always online. Not the same, but close.
 

Meier

Member
I don't see any scenario where MS can go through with it since Sony hasn't. It'd make the system stillborn.
 

ironcreed

Banned
Well, if they do indeed go this route then it just confirms that my relationship with Xbox will be over. I'll still enjoy my library on my 360 of course, but they can take a hike with this shit. It's quite troubling that we keep hearing this.
 
Top Bottom