This was published on The Guardian a couple of weeks back and I couldn't find a thread on it. Pretty terrifying stuff.
Basically the article is a book review of Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America by Nancy MacLean.
The book is largely based on the writings by Nobel Prize for Economics winner James Buchannan. She found his writings and notes posthumously in his estate (or something).
Basically we have this guy to thank for the stealthy rise of totalitarian capitalism and the cunning way it has been pulling the rug out from under democracy and welfare for decades.
important update: There's a nice counter point article from Vox at the bottom of the OP. Basically saying J Buchanan never really intended or explicitly said any of this. Which is v interesting.
Super dark bit:
Give in to constitutional revolution if old
edit: strong counterpoint from Vox
https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/20...s-james-buchanan-intellectual-history-maclean
Thanks kirblar
Basically the article is a book review of Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America by Nancy MacLean.
The book is largely based on the writings by Nobel Prize for Economics winner James Buchannan. She found his writings and notes posthumously in his estate (or something).
Basically we have this guy to thank for the stealthy rise of totalitarian capitalism and the cunning way it has been pulling the rug out from under democracy and welfare for decades.
important update: There's a nice counter point article from Vox at the bottom of the OP. Basically saying J Buchanan never really intended or explicitly said any of this. Which is v interesting.
[James Buchanan] argued that a society could not be considered free unless every citizen has the right to veto its decisions. What he meant by this was that no one should be taxed against their will. But the rich were being exploited by people who use their votes to demand money that others have earned, through involuntary taxes to support public spending and welfare. Allowing workers to form trade unions and imposing graduated income taxes were forms of differential or discriminatory legislation against the owners of capital.
Any clash between freedom (allowing the rich to do as they wish) and democracy should be resolved in favour of freedom. In his book The Limits of Liberty, he noted that despotism may be the only organisational alternative to the political structure that we observe. Despotism in defence of freedom.
His prescription was a constitutional revolution: creating irrevocable restraints to limit democratic choice. Sponsored throughout his working life by wealthy foundations, billionaires and corporations, he developed a theoretical account of what this constitutional revolution would look like, and a strategy for implementing it.
Super dark bit:
The papers Nancy MacLean discovered show that Buchanan saw stealth as crucial. He told his collaborators that conspiratorial secrecy is at all times essential. Instead of revealing their ultimate destination, they would proceed by incremental steps. For example, in seeking to destroy the social security system, they would claim to be saving it, arguing that it would fail without a series of radical reforms. (The same argument is used by those attacking the NHS). Gradually they would build a counter-intelligentsia, allied to a vast network of political power that would become the new establishment.
Through the network of thinktanks that Koch and other billionaires have sponsored, through their transformation of the Republican party, and the hundreds of millions they have poured into state congressional and judicial races, through the mass colonisation of Trumps administration by members of this network and lethally effective campaigns against everything from public health to action on climate change, it would be fair to say that Buchanans vision is maturing in the US.
But not just there. Reading this book felt like a demisting of the window through which I see British politics. The bonfire of regulations highlighted by the Grenfell Tower disaster, the destruction of state architecture through austerity, the budgeting rules, the dismantling of public services, tuition fees and the control of schools: all these measures follow Buchanans programme to the letter. I wonder how many people are aware that David Camerons free schools project stands in a tradition designed to hamper racial desegregation in the American south.
Give in to constitutional revolution if old
edit: strong counterpoint from Vox
https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/20...s-james-buchanan-intellectual-history-maclean
A deep, historical study of public choice would be welcome, and Buchanans role in the development of the thought and organizational infrastructure of the right has generally been overlooked. Unfortunately, the book is an example of precisely the kind of work on the right that we do not need, and the intellectuals of the left who have praised it are doing their side no favors.
Thanks kirblar