We've plenty of time for the procrastinators and stragglers yet.Slim pickins this time it seems. Damn you, Easter Bunny!
Patience, grasshopper.
We've plenty of time for the procrastinators and stragglers yet.Slim pickins this time it seems. Damn you, Easter Bunny!
I'm on vacation! Just buzzing by!We've plenty of time for the procrastinators and stragglers yet.
Patience, grasshopper.
Until I get up this morning on the West Coast, or until someone beats me to the punch : PJust how late could I leave it to submit something?
3 points and I didn't even write this week. That's just how good I am.1. Carlisle
2. Ouro
3. Bolus
Whew. Made it before the deadline.
I originally omitted this, but a fellow GAFer mentioned he had brothers, so I had to go look it up.Ourobolus: I didn’t “get” it until the second reading, which just seems… really embarrassing for me. I think I was probably thrown off by the mention of adopted brothers, since as far as I know of biblical trivia, I didn’t know Jesus supposedly had more than one brother, or that they were adopted.
Were you there?The characters’ dialogue was very modern and colloquial for supposedly taking place in biblical times. In and of itself that’s not necessarily a problem, but I guess in my mind it builds a bit of an expectation of screwball comedy? Blame it on Monty Python movies.
I think you're reading far too much into what is basically a silly story (though admittedly not a very good one).I don’t think the gag you were shooting for ultimately worked out quite as planned, because I’m relatively certain that the Virgin Mary didn’t stay a virgin after Jesus was born. It’s not impossible that a couple would be married and never have had sex (I’ve read some interesting articles about such people), but it’s such an abnormality that it needs far more exploration than a confession of chastity cut off in mid sentence.
That's nothing, did you read what I said about poor Tangent's story? Heh heh.I think you're reading far too much into what is basically a silly story (though admittedly not a very good one).
Nezumi: I really liked the notion of how statues communicate with one another, even if it did kind of come in as a fairly lengthy tangent right after the introduction of Percy that almost made me forget about him. I was also a little confused by the ice sculpture being described as being made of some kind of opaque stone, as I immediately thought oh, its an ice sculpture, but then thought wait, maybe not, Ive never seen opaque ice. Granted Ive seen ice that wasnt perfectly transparent, but never ice that didnt have at least some degree of translucency to it. It had a very mythological feel to it, but not quite since I guess it didnt explain anything like myths usually do. All around well-composed though.
I don't think I'm capable of this...I don't know if anyone is interested, nor do I know a ton about the Gotham Writer's Workshop, but they've got a contest open for people to submit a short story of ten words or less. Winner gets a free 10-week workshop.
http://www.writingclasses.com/ContestPages/10W.php
I don't think I'm capable of this...
Maybe I can write it using nothing but compound words in German...
It's "Lebensabschnittspartner" and it and "Rechtsschutzversicherungsgesellschaften" need to be capitalized. Other than that it is grammatically correct even though it technically might sound strange because it would make more sense for the "Lebensabschnittparter" to work for a "Rechtsschutzversicherungsgesellschaft", singular. In which case you would have needed to state that by writing "für eine Rechtsschutzversicherungsgesellschaft". But I guess that it might technically be possible to work for more than one "Rechtschutzversicherungsgesellschaft" in which case your sentence would be correct.Mein lebensabschnittpartner arbeitet für rechtsschutzversicherungsgesellschaften!
I butchered the conjugation, didn't I?
It's "Lebensabschnittspartner" and it and "Rechtsschutzversicherungsgesellschaften" need to be capitalized. Other than that it is grammatically correct even though it technically no sense because it would more sense for the "Lebensabschnittparter" to work for a "Rechtsschutzversicherungsgesellschaft", singular. In which case you would have needed to state that by writing "für eine Rechtsschutzversicherungsgesellschaft". But I guess that it might technically be possible to work for more than one "Rechtschutzversicherungsgesellschaft" in which your sentence would be correct.
Mike M: I’m not certain how successful this was. To me, what the MC underwent is probably one of the worst possible things I can imagine, and reminds me of some children’s book I read when I was little about a kid who dressed up as an old man for Halloween, went into a house or something, and then came out as an actual old man. It was profoundly disturbing to me. I tried to convey that in this, but I don’t communicate emotion very well, so in my view it’s just 1500 words of world building followed by 500 words of theme as GRW810 is wont to deride : P It’s really frustrating to conceive of this thing that I would consider unfathomably devastating being done in some horribly misguided sense of good, and just… not get across the unfathomable devastation of it all…
Ourobolus:
What a shocking revelation to get as a kid.
Low voter turn out? Must be a midterm election year : P
1. Nezumi (10)
2. Cyan (9)
3. Aaron (8)
kaepernickehs (6)
Mike M (4)
Bootaaay (3)
Ourobolus (2)
GRW810 (1)
Huh, just missing someone at the 7 and 5 point level...
And cyan has 6 points putting him in the third place behindert aaronGRW810 got 4 points though.
I fucked up my Excel spreadsheet.
Sorry, it's too early for math.