Actually, no. I dont troll. I was expressing a legitimate frustration at how Americans by and large are asleep when it comes to a lot of big picture stuff and how its a little funny to me that something like this wakes them up. No biggie.
And that is exactly the problem.
The Big Banks literally stole $16 TRILLION from the US Treasury, aka US tax-payer, in the biggest train heist in history in 2008. Most of the Fortune 100 pay zero or close to zero taxes while some of the biggest actually get massive multi-billion dollar subsidies straight out of tax payer pockets...have purchased and own all 3 branches of goverment to keep it that way...and yet continue to offshore living wage jobs by the millions despite massive profit windfalls and tax breaks. US trade policy is insane and encourages corporations to literally steal from the US Treasury. The US military is still stealing $2 billion PER WEEK to conduct a pointless war in Afghanistan while the corporate owned media ignores it...and now the mil-ind complex wants more billions to go back in to Iraq again...bc they did such a bang up job the first time. Giant pharmaceutical companies got a $2 TRILLION wet kiss from the Bush administration that allows them to monopolize and jack up prices on US citizens while the rest of the world can get far cheap(er) pharma from the same companies. Most corps in the US are allowed to operate monopolies or duopolies within their respective markets...suposed govt by the people, for the people anti-trust nowhere to be found...engaging in massive system wide price fixing which is tantamount to large scale theft from millions of Americans on a continual basis.
I could list an endless parade of instances of massive systemic theft that, when taken together and looked at from a macro-perspective, indicates the entire US economic system has become one giant shell-game con, top to bottom.
So, in that context, we're going to tell this guy its wrong and horrible to steal a $40-$50 game bc it "hurts tax-payers"? Lol In light of the way the US economy works in the real world this doesn't pass the straight face test.
So, yeah, I guess its wrong in an absolute sense...but lets not kid ourselves people. This is similar hypocrisy to how we are taught for years not to cheat on tests in school...and then get out into the real world and realize most of the biggest, most successful executives and companies have gotten where they are by cheating, lying, and stealing. And then we, as a society, admire them for their wealth, conveniently ignoring how they stole...er..."earned" it.
Id say dont take the game...figure out a way to buy it. But, if you do steal it I wouldnt say relatively speaking you're a bad person. Over the last few years alone, tax payers have literally been ripped off for TRILLIONS of dollars by the very corporations and govt institutions they trust. I dont think another $50 is going to hurt anyone. The US military steals and spends more than that on a rubber band or paper-clip.
Right here. You're saying in the context you laid out that we can't say the OP is wrong. You're directly saying we can't call the OP for theft because of the actions of the US government,
Use to work at a library.
We were still using printers from the 80s when I worked there. In 2005.
Their budget is low enough, and we already had problems with people taking rare books and ebaying them and eating the lost fee. Now they send everyone to collections.
Do it
No, thats not what I said and certainly not what I meant. If a bunch of people interpreted it that way then perhaps I didnt do a good enough job of being clear. You are free to condemn this guy all you want...after all, I said stealing the game is wrong in an absolute sense more than once. Anywho, I dont see the big issue here...I wrote something that I was hoping would have a positive impact on the discussion by bringing in some big picture perspective...but perhaps bc of how I wrote it a few people took my intent the wrong way. Miscommunications happen. I'll try to be more clear from now on guys. Now will everyone chill the hell out and have a drink, please? Lol
Well the fee for a single game is capped at $10 at my library and they don't even send to collections until you owe at least $40.
And that is exactly the problem.
Oh god, you even researched it.
Well the fee for a single game is capped at $10 at my library and they don't even send to collections until you owe at least $40.
If your response to me pulling a direct quote is "that's not what I said" then I can only assume you're trolling.No, thats not what I said and certainly not what I meant. If a bunch of people interpreted it that way then perhaps I didnt do a good enough job of being clear. You are free to condemn this guy all you want...after all, I said stealing the game is wrong in an absolute sense more than once. Anywho, I dont see the big issue here...I wrote something that I was hoping would have a positive impact on the discussion by bringing in some big picture perspective...but perhaps bc of how I wrote it a few people took my intent the wrong way. Miscommunications happen. I'll try to be more clear from now on guys. Now will everyone chill the hell out and have a drink, please? Lol
Well the fee for a single game is capped at $10 at my library and they don't even send to collections until you owe at least $40.
Someone must've laced me or something.
Edit: Also OP, don't steal. I said it before, but lots of families and people in need could really benefit from it. And usually, at least at my library, replacement fees don't cover the full cost of what was purchased.
If your response to me pulling a direct quote is "that's not what I said" then I can only assume you're trolling.
Edit: you're right, let's have a drink. Cheers!
Perhaps not, because you were implicitly condoning the OP stealing the game through not just the thread you decided to use as your soapbox (which, the truth aside, might be a bit of a tangent), but also by the things you said. You didn't have to explicitly say that the OP should steal the game, but by saying that it would be inconsequential to taxpayers if he were to,given everything else going on, it's not too hard to follow the logic through. Stealing it in the OP's case isn't just about the net damage, either; it's the principle of the thing.No, thats not what I said and certainly not what I meant. If a bunch of people interpreted it that way then perhaps I didnt do a good enough job of being clear.
I hope you realize that people are bewildered not because your post isn't "dumbed down" enough, but rather because it's barely related to the topic at hand. What we're having is a clear-cut case that has no use of relative speak. People are having none of your attempt to steer the discussion towards the big picture because that would obfuscate the picture we already have.No, thats not what I said and certainly not what I meant. If a bunch of people interpreted it that way then perhaps I didnt do a good enough job of being clear. You are free to condemn this guy all you want...after all, I said stealing the game is wrong in an absolute sense more than once. Anywho, I dont see the big issue here...I wrote something that I was hoping would have a positive impact on the discussion by bringing in some big picture perspective...but perhaps bc of how I wrote it a few people took my intent the wrong way. Miscommunications happen. I'll try to be more clear from now on guys. Now will everyone chill the hell out and have a drink, please? Lol
I pay banking fees. Hmm...Hang on. Your logic is that since you pay taxes you feel that you are entitled to steal from the library?
Actually, no. I dont troll. I was expressing a legitimate frustration at how Americans by and large are asleep when it comes to a lot of big picture stuff and how its a little funny to me that something like this wakes them up. No biggie.
There is no miscommunication here. I understand perfectly what you're trying to say, but my question to you is why should all the instances of the government and banks and corporations committing theft matter in this discussion. We have no reason to frame this discussion about OP and his library against the "big picture".No, thats not what I said and certainly not what I meant. If a bunch of people interpreted it that way then perhaps I didnt do a good enough job of being clear. You are free to condemn this guy all you want...after all, I said stealing the game is wrong in an absolute sense more than once. Anywho, I dont see the big issue here...I wrote something that I was hoping would have a positive impact on the discussion by bringing in some big picture perspective...but perhaps bc of how I wrote it a few people took my intent the wrong way. Miscommunications happen. I'll try to be more clear from now on guys. Now will everyone chill the hell out and have a drink, please? Lol
It wasn't going to go to collections because I said I was going to pay the fee.
I also said a while ago I wasn't going to keep the game but I imagine it's "read thread title, read first post, get mad" for most people.
Condescend much?
In which case you might want to edit your first post and make your decision clear to everyone reading the thread. I went though all 8 pages and didn't notice you saying such a thing.I also said a while ago I wasn't going to keep the game but I imagine it's "read thread title, read first post, get mad" for most people.
Well the fee for a single game is capped at $10 at my library and they don't even send to collections until you owe at least $40.
Isn't this kinda risking your neogaf account? It happened in the ebay thread. That was so much funnier than this thread could ever hope to be.
Edit: the one where a guy thought he was gonna be scammed by his buyer and proceeded to scam him first lol.
It wasn't going to go to collections because I said I was going to pay the fee.
I also said a while ago I wasn't going to keep the game but I imagine it's "read thread title, read first post, get mad" for most people.
I think this discussion got off-track bc I was trying to make a big-picture point that didnt come off as clearly or as well as Id hoped. The ultra levels of snark really arent necessary. I was simply hoping to steer the discussion in a more productive direction by thinking of big picture stuff. I obviously missed the target in this thread. It happens.
Actually, no. I dont troll. I was expressing a legitimate frustration at how Americans by and large are asleep when it comes to a lot of big picture stuff and how its a little funny to me that something like this wakes them up. No biggie.
I hope you realize that people are bewildered not because your post isn't "dumbed down" enough, but rather because it's barely related to the topic at hand. What we're having is a clear-cut case that has no use of relative speak. People are having none of your attempt to steer the discussion towards the big picture because that would obfuscate the picture we already have.
People can both be disgusted by small unlawful act as well as the big ones. Try making a topic about how you're planning to avoid paying million dollars of tax and see how well people would react to that.
The Big Banks literally stole $16 TRILLION from the US Treasury, aka US tax-payer, in the biggest train heist in history in 2008. Most of the Fortune 100 pay zero or close to zero taxes while some of the biggest actually get massive multi-billion dollar subsidies straight out of tax payer pockets...have purchased and own all 3 branches of goverment to keep it that way...and yet continue to offshore living wage jobs by the millions despite massive profit windfalls and tax breaks. US trade policy is insane and encourages corporations to literally steal from the US Treasury. The US military is still stealing $2 billion PER WEEK to conduct a pointless war in Afghanistan while the corporate owned media ignores it...and now the mil-ind complex wants more billions to go back in to Iraq again...bc they did such a bang up job the first time. Giant pharmaceutical companies got a $2 TRILLION wet kiss from the Bush administration that allows them to monopolize and jack up prices on US citizens while the rest of the world can get far cheap(er) pharma from the same companies. Most corps in the US are allowed to operate monopolies or duopolies within their respective markets...suposed govt by the people, for the people anti-trust nowhere to be found...engaging in massive system wide price fixing which is tantamount to large scale theft from millions of Americans on a continual basis.
I could list an endless parade of instances of massive systemic theft that, when taken together and looked at from a macro-perspective, indicates the entire US economic system has become one giant shell-game con, top to bottom.
So, in that context, we're going to tell this guy its wrong and horrible to steal a $40-$50 game bc it "hurts tax-payers"? Lol In light of the way the US economy works in the real world this doesn't pass the straight face test.
So, yeah, I guess its wrong in an absolute sense...but lets not kid ourselves people. This is similar hypocrisy to how we are taught for years not to cheat on tests in school...and then get out into the real world and realize most of the biggest, most successful executives and companies have gotten where they are by cheating, lying, and stealing. And then we, as a society, admire them for their wealth, conveniently ignoring how they stole...er..."earned" it.
Id say dont take the game...figure out a way to buy it. But, if you do steal it I wouldnt say relatively speaking you're a bad person. Over the last few years alone, tax payers have literally been ripped off for TRILLIONS of dollars by the very corporations and govt institutions they trust. I dont think another $50 is going to hurt anyone. The US military steals and spends more than that on a rubber band or paper-clip.
Well, I'd be paying them the replacement fee so I don't know if it's stealing. And I can clearly see what portion of my property taxes goes to the library annually. I am one of the tax payers in this instance.
Hello GAF, I want to steal from a library