I do applaud apple for bringing families together around the table when Dad discovers his child spent $1000 on predatory microtransactions
![tumblr_m0fggc0kFY1r7a2bao1_250.gif](https://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0fggc0kFY1r7a2bao1_250.gif)
I do applaud apple for bringing families together around the table when Dad discovers his child spent $1000 on predatory microtransactions
porn?
more like tissue papers please.
fucking apple. so dumb
Okay, this whole thing is BS. Pocket Gamer did an opinion piece on Apple's censorship of games
http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/r/iPad/Papers,+Please/feature.asp?c=62961
http://i.imgur.com/TcczbGj.jpg (NSFW)
From Telltale's Wolf Among Us, not censored at all
As PG said, that inconsistency is really ridiculous.
Apps containing pornographic material, defined by Webster's Dictionary as "explicit descriptions or displays of sexual organs or activities intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings", will be rejected.
I think the inconsistency comes from Telltale rating their game 17+ and Pope rating his game 12+.
Nudity isn't generally considered OK for a 12 year old's game.
Just talked to Apple. The initial rejection for porn was a misunderstanding on their part. They suggested I resubmit with the nudity option.
I'll make an update to restore the nudity over the weekend (default to off) and it should be available next week.
I'm sure the Vita version won't suffer the same fate, whenever they decide to release that.
I'll wait for that one.
Did he rate the original version 12+? I'd assume that he would have rated the original game 17+, but after he removed the nudity, changed the rating to 12+.
If he tried to submit it with nudity as 12+, then Apple's decision makes a lot more sense. But it's dumb that they wouldn't just approve it and change the rating.
The original submission was 17+. I lowered it to 12+ after removing the nudity.
In any case, It looks like the initial rejection was a misunderstanding. Apple just contacted me and said the app reviewer made a mistake and that I should resubmit with the nudity option restored.
If I had to guess, I'd say they found the "NUDITY" checkbox in the game's settings and figured it was too risky. Not sure I'd handle it any better if I was a reviewer slogging through submissions.
I'm going to put the nudity checkbox back in (default to off) and resubmit the game over the weekend.
The original submission was 17+. I lowered it to 12+ after removing the nudity.
In any case, It looks like the initial rejection was a misunderstanding. Apple just contacted me and said the app reviewer made a mistake and that I should resubmit with the nudity option restored.
If I had to guess, I'd say they found the "NUDITY" checkbox in the game's settings and figured it was too risky. Not sure I'd handle it any better if I was a reviewer slogging through submissions.
I'm going to put the nudity checkbox back in (default to off) and resubmit the game over the weekend.
ETA: Damn you guys work fast.
In any case, It looks like the initial rejection was a misunderstanding. Apple just contacted me and said the app reviewer made a mistake and that I should resubmit with the nudity option restored.
If I had to guess, I'd say they found the "NUDITY" checkbox in the game's settings and figured it was too risky. Not sure I'd handle it any better if I was a reviewer slogging through submissions.
I'm going to put the nudity checkbox back in (default to off) and resubmit the game over the weekend.
Fantastic news! I'm surprised they even found the checkbox; in my experience with App Store reviewers many of them can hardly be bothered to use it. I think they should probably have a feedback mechanism so that reviewers can ask questions of the developer without outright rejecting an app.
I do wonder though...
sweet. Curious how it plays on touch. I guess i could just try it on my surface pro instead of rebuying it on ipad.