jeremy1456 said:Why does it offend you so? He basically just said that he wants to make better games that don't require gimmicks to make people keep returning to them. How is that bad?
pakkit said:The quotes from Sony's conference where the demoer said that he had created motion control with the original EyeToy. My Dreamcast weeps.
stuburns said:In a podcast the other day he didn't understand what had happened with having to watch the conference on a monitor.
A Budding Game Designer said:Problem #1: Cammy and Reggie and Bill, projected onstage for the loss. Seriously. WTF. None of the folks I was with could figure why Nintendo's executive team was being projected on stage. At first we thought it might be because it would make the eventual, live, on-stage appearance of Miyamoto or Iwaya seem electric by comparison. Or maybe they would use the rehearsed, possibly canned studio performance to add special effects or surprise us in some multimedia way. None of these things happened. Miyamoto was a no-show, and while Iwata did show up to make his usual stilted English delivery, it was onscreen as well. This conveyed a serious, serious disconnect with the audience who might as well have watched this at home, at their leisure, instead of getting up for a 7:15am call time. Only when the entire conference was over did real humans appear on stage to alert people to the playable kiosks. Too bad the majority of the crowd was pouring out at conference's end to head off to Sony's show.
WTF did he seriously not realize they were live in another theater and that he was not important enough to get to go there?morningbus said:Just quoting this so it doesn't get buried in the thread:
Vinnie: They make Sheppard look really dark in this game
Jeff: Oh you gotta do some dirty business in this game because it is a dirty ass mission. You gotta do dirt son. SPACE DIRT!
Ryan: The worst kind of dirt
Jeff: There aint no gravity to stop that dirt from getting all up in everything.
Jeff said:"shit's getting ripped apart and you just gotta rip it apart HARDER"
Sol.. said:and my vote is still *clap**clap**clap*YEAH*clap*clap*
Seriously, I'm drawing a blank. Anybody?yanhero said:Wait, I missed this part, when was this??
godhandiscen said:I had never been interested in this film until now. I actually like the concept. I want to see it. I am saddened that the game adaptation will be just another movie tie in from what I heard though.
Well Kaz Hirai did a bit of it, e.g. when he mentioned MGS and was about to switch gears to Hideo Kojima.Catalix said:Seriously, I'm drawing a blank. Anybody?
The PSEye guys always seem pretty awesome. Just wish Rick Marx would let go of the IF YOU WERE IN AN RPG AND CHOSE FIREBALL AND YOU COULD THROW IT analogy, it's been about 6 years or so since the tech demo in that PS2 demo disc and we really don't wanna hear anymore fireball shenanigans.iamcool388 said:I liked the part where the two researchers were demoing Motion Control at the Sony Conference, and one of the guys went...
"Tickle tickle!!!" :lol :lol
I genuinely laughed. I'd hang out with them... they seemed like good people.
Rez said:wowowowowow[/QUOTE]
Yeah...
Mielke said:Problem #1: Cammy and Reggie and Bill, projected onstage for the loss. Seriously. WTF. None of the folks I was with could figure why Nintendo's executive team was being projected on stage. At first we thought it might be because it would make the eventual, live, on-stage appearance of Miyamoto or Iwaya seem electric by comparison. Or maybe they would use the rehearsed, possibly canned studio performance to add special effects or surprise us in some multimedia way. None of these things happened. Miyamoto was a no-show, and while Iwata did show up to make his usual stilted English delivery, it was onscreen as well. This conveyed a serious, serious disconnect with the audience who might as well have watched this at home, at their leisure, instead of getting up for a 7:15am call time. Only when the entire conference was over did real humans appear on stage to alert people to the playable kiosks. Too bad the majority of the crowd was pouring out at conference's end to head off to Sony's show.
Struct09 said:Miyamoto makes my favorite games, and I would never question his choices in game design, but I'm still a fan of achievements. They don't have to be a carrot on a stick, if they're designed well they can be a part of the fun.
ahahahah :lol :lol :lolmorningbus said:Just quoting this so it doesn't get buried in the thread:
JSnake said:Of his position? Sure. Anyone in my position would be. But that's something to work towards, not something to daydream about while sitting on my laurels. Am I jealous of his personality and attitude towards his profession? (laughs)
I wonder how you feel about that comment now, a few days later. I'm kind of surprised about the amount of enthusiasm coming from someone I don't remember being overly into Wii and Eyetoy kind of games.Gary Whitta said:Wow, that was some week, huh!![]()
I would like to go one E3 without these. Just one.. is that too much to ask?500 - Internal Server Error
I've always been a big believer in the Wii and motion control. I'm sure I could dig up some old podcasts and quotes to support that if I could be bothered, but I can't. But I camped out overnight for a Wii at launch and have both the PS Eye and the original EyeToy. I love that experimental stuff, even if the full potential of its application isn't immediately apparent. And I think Natal is (potentially) fantastic.Lord Error said:I wonder how you feel about that comment now, a few days later. I'm kind of surprised about the amount of enthusiasm coming from someone I don't remember being overly into Wii and Eyetoy kind of games.
Well hey, we all get excited every now and then. I can understand it.Gary Whitta said:I've always been a big believer in the Wii and motion control. I'm sure I could dig up some old podcasts and quotes to support that if I could be bothered, but I can't. But I camped out overnight for a Wii at launch and have both the PS Eye and the original EyeToy. I love that experimental stuff, even if the full potential of its application isn't immediately apparent. And I think Natal is (potentially) fantastic.
As for that quote... ha, I guess I wrote gaming magazine coverlines for too many years; the habit of making fairly exaggerated statements in order to get a reaction/grab people's attention is a hard one to break. I still think when all is said and done at the end of this generation the 360 will be deemed my most non-biased pundits to have "won".
No need to dig anything up - I believe you, and sorry for that comment. I just must have mixed you up with someone else, and I think I know who actually.Gary Whitta said:I've always been a big believer in the Wii and motion control. I'm sure I could dig up some old podcasts and quotes to support that if I could be bothered, but I can't. But I camped out overnight for a Wii at launch and have both the PS Eye and the original EyeToy. I love that experimental stuff, even if the full potential of its application isn't immediately apparent. And I think Natal is (potentially) fantastic.
Well, if first party support is anything to go by, Sony is definitely unmatched. It's what I love about Sony. I would say they certainly weren't outdone by anyone this E3.
This dude is on drugs.
DuckRacer said:It reminds me of "I don't know how much you know about Japanese culture (I'm an expert)".
It was a joke post meltdown on GAF following FFXIII to Xbox.FartOfWar said:hahaha, that's not an actual quote is it?
DeaconKnowledge said:So we're just now finding out that Miellke is an idiot?
Were Muppet's posts in that thread proven to be a joke? I always just assumed he'd lost it for a bit.pakkit said:It was a joke post meltdown on GAF following FFXIII to Xbox.
The difference being that was a post written for lulz, whereas Milky wrote up that paragraph, and then went on pretending he was unbiased.
reggieandTFE said:Mielke is such an idiot. In my mind the day he became editor of EGM was the day it died.
Catalix said:Seriously, I'm drawing a blank. Anybody?
A Budding Young Game Designer said:John, Paul, George and Ringo (and Elvis!) did more in one song that many of you will do in a lifetime
If you just read some of his post history it's obvious he was joking.crowphoenix said:Were Muppet's posts in that thread proven to be a joke? I always just assumed he'd lost it for a bit.
AniHawk said:The problem isn't that they exist, it's that so many people go crazy over them. There's absolutely no point in getting them. Or, at least, there's absolutely no point in playing games you know will be bad just to get more achievements to increase your gamerscore. You can't buy things with achievement points, so what's the big fucking deal?
smhSaiyar said:Was it last years E3 where he was at a press conference and said he wouldn't ask questions because he didn't want other journalists to benifit from his insight. I think that is when we figured out he was an idiot.
Struct09 said:Why is people going crazy over them a problem? While I'm not too concerned with my gamerscore, if people enjoy getting achievements, even from subpar games, good for them. And as I stated before, if they're designed well they can shape the way you play and enjoy the game, an example being the Geometry Wars games.
Saying that achievement points are pointless is odd, since using the same line of thinking you could say that playing games is completely pointless as well. You don't get shit for playing games (aside from very few exceptions like 1vs100), so why do it?
:lol:lol :lolFartOfWar said:
Brilliant post.Opiate said:I think the actual argument would be this: there is a chemical distinction in the brain between "fun" and "addictive" behaviors. While it's entirely likely that many would mistake one for the other, because both create feelings of reward through endorphins, I believe we'd describe the former as healthy and the latter as unhealthy.
One might argue that the behavior described above (collecting achievements from games you don't enjoy) fits the latter description better than the former. Can I prove this? Absolutely not. It's purely a conjecture, and I certainly could be wrong. But if you're looking for a possible explanation, there it is.
I read through some of his history, but not enough to get a good sense of whether he was joking or not. Good to know.pakkit said:If you just read some of his post history it's obvious he was joking.
pakkit said:If you just read some of his post history it's obvious he was joking.
Zeliard said:![]()
This should be framed and hung up on this gaming generation's metaphorical wall.
Opiate said:I think the actual argument would be this: there is a chemical distinction in the brain between "fun" and "addictive" behaviors. While it's entirely likely that many would mistake one for the other, because both create feelings of reward through endorphins, I believe we'd describe the former as healthy and the latter as unhealthy.
One might argue that the behavior described above (collecting achievements from games you don't enjoy) fits the latter description better than the former. Can I prove this? Absolutely not. It's purely a conjecture, and I certainly could be wrong. But if you're looking for a possible explanation, there it is.
KTallguy said:Great quote from Miyamoto. I agree with him to some extent. Having unlockable rewards that allow the player to experience the game in new ways is always preferable over achievements/trophies in my book.
Had me in stitches on the bus. I'm certain the cluster of old ladies seated opposite me considered me a raging loon.Justin said:From one of the bombcasts talking about the mass effect trailer
"Vinnie: They make Sheppard look really dark in this game
Jeff: Oh you gotta do some dirty business in this game because it is a dirty ass mission. You gotta do dirt son. SPACE DIRT!
Ryan: The worst kind of dirt
Jeff: There aint no gravity to stop that dirt from getting all up in everything."
iamcool388 said:Most bad-ass quote of E3:
Feep said:I FUCKING TRAVELED THROUGH TIME AND JUMPED ON A DINOSAUR AND USED IT TO KILL MOTHERFUCKING ROBOT ZOMBIES.
I have got to find this quote. :lol :lolSaiyar said:Was it last years E3 where he was at a press conference and said he wouldn't ask questions because he didn't want other journalists to benifit from his insight. I think that is when we figured out he was an idiot.
chubigans said:I have got to find this quote. :lol :lol