HDMI > RGB > Component > S-Video > Composite > RF, to my understanding. No idea if RGB can handle HD resolutions or not, but Component only has information on two of three channels, as well as luminance, and derives the third from that; RGB just gives you all three channels, period.HDMI > Component > (RGB?) > S-Video > Composite > RF
VGA is A LOT LOT better than component actually. And RGB SCART beats component on anything except for bandwidth. (which makes it impossible for SCART to do progressive scan)RGB Scart cant handle 480p, so quality wise Component and VGA got that beat.
Did PS2 or original xbox have s-video? I remember using s-video for my dvd player back in the day but I can't remember if I used them for my consoles.
I'm 60% sure I used s-video for either of those consoles.
I was really surprised by the difference it made for my dvd player.
Gamers in America got the shaft. I'd just love a TV that would accept 60Hz SCART, and not have to fumble around with confusing component conversion.
I only used it once but I had very few devices that support it.
Fun fact: SNES and N64 both support S-Video, but the S-Video cable wasn't sold in America until the GameCube.
I never had the Nintendo S-Video cable.
Saturn, Xbox and Dreamcast were hooked up with S-Video cables. Good old days.
Its too bad its gone away with newer HDTVs yet they keep the old A/V composite jacks.
Hooked up Svid to the SNES as soon as I was able to acquire a cable. Showed all my friends the superiority to RF and composite.
Went to component as soon as possible on the PS1.
I knew my shit as a kid.
I'm pretty sure "Master Race" doesn't work that way.RF Master Race. Don't think I've ever owned a S-video cable.
I used S-Video on my TV from 1997 to 2008.
RGB SCART or nothing.