The best facts around.
I can only see a mustache girl and some letters rumbled together.
Translation ?
The best facts around.
I can only see a mustache girl and some letters rumbled together.
Translation ?
You also need gold just to record? Jesus.
[/IMG]http://i.imgur.com/HOxdsjS.png[/IMG]
it's a good thing! Premium means good right?
PREMIUMM SHIT YOGame DVR requires Gold? What the fuck?
Pet peeve... why do people keep acting like it's only $100 MS is taking from your pocket if you don't want to use the Kinect? That thing contributes more than $100 to the $499 price.
it's a good thing! Premium means good right?
SO DEVELOPERS WILL USE IT BECAUSE THEY CAN COUNT ON YOU AT LEAST HAVING IT.
Are people still not getting this? It's to ensure Kinect is a feature for developers and not an optional accessory. This way there is no fragmentation in the user base, everyone has a Kinect so development time and resource isn't wasted on a small number of people who might have a Kinect.
So developers can count on the consumer having it when they are designing games. This means we should see more Kinect-centric games instead of just having Kinect features be a miniscule optional thing.
I'm sure glad every PS3 controller came with Sixaxis functionality. We got to see such innovative and interesting features across the PS3 game library thanks to it being in every controller and developers not having to worry about fragmentation of the user base. It really shook things up and made for unique experiences on the PS3.
People are just convincing themselves with this silly argument at this point.
I'm sure glad every PS3 controller came with Sixaxis functionality. We got to see such innovative and interesting features across the PS3 game library thanks to it being in every controller and developers not having to worry about fragmentation of the user base. It really shook things up and made for unique experiences on the PS3.
People are just convincing themselves with this silly argument at this point.
Disregarding Kinect, are you implying that a weaker system justifies a cheaper cost? By your logic, a gaming PC should cost in excess of $1500 because the "GPU etc" is stronger when compared to the Xbox One and PS4.yeh....weaker GPU etc compared to PS4.... probably could have gone 349.99 without it.
Disregarding Kinect, are you implying that a weaker system justifies a cheaper cost? By your logic, a gaming PC should cost in excess of $1500 because the "GPU etc" is stronger when compared to the Xbox One and PS4.
yeh....weaker GPU etc compared to PS4.... probably could have gone 349.99 without it.
Smart move for MS to clear up misinformation. Misinformation that they should have dealt with months ago.
And gimme that Kinect baby!
24m Kinects is a lot. It it were less, then the XB1 probably wouldn't ship with one.
That's new information. Not misinformation. Their post should contain the word "anymore".
Smart move for MS to clear up misinformation. Misinformation that they should have dealt with months ago.
Or rather "after all". You can't say their console ever required kinect or an online connection since they cancelled it after it was released.That's new information. Not misinformation. Their post should contain the word "anymore".
?
So you honestly think things would have been exactly the same if sixasis wasn't in every controller from the start?
It more than likely would have been even worse.
So no it's not a silly argument. Kinect could fizzle out in terms of support next gen but it's still in a better position due to it being packed into every console.
I've just woke up and read the OPs fact again.
MS should be embarrassed that they made that.
How can a company sell a product at over a hundred dollars more premium and tell its consumers that they can just unplug it/turn it off if they basically don't want it.
I didn't know that Microsoft is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to buy the Xbox One. It's a complete package, meaning the Kinect is included. If you want to customize you go to Burger King and customize your burger there.Translation:
I want games for the Kinect, so I want Microsoft to force you to buy one, even if you don't want one or intend to buy one, to trick developers into think it has a userbase, when it's quite clear it doesn't, won't and never will.
Because too many people think they still need to keep it plugged in at all times.
You can blame MS for originally planning the system that made consumers (rightfully) think that in the first place, but now that they changed everything you can't blame them for informing everybody about it.
Wow, the xbox hate is strong.
That's new information. Not misinformation. Their post should contain the word "anymore".
The real smart move would have been for them to have clear and concise messaging on XBO from the start. But no, they dropped the ball and they know it. The fact that they have to make ads like this is sad and I have no doubt that this "facts" website is driven from them hearing consumer feedback directly from their retail partners (GameStop, Walmart, etc.).
Because too many people think they still need to keep it plugged in at all times.
You can blame MS for originally planning the system that made consumers (rightfully) think that in the first place, but now that they changed everything you can't blame them for informing everybody about it.
Stupid descision to force it upon people in the first place, Only this past week MS are bragging about selling 80m consoles and yet of that usebase only 24m bought Kinect.
Surely that should tell them that the vast majority of thier customers almost 3/4 quarters coudnt give a toss about Kinect.
Wow, the xbox hate is strong.
I'm still glad Kinect is packed in. Sometimes innovation needs to happen even though people don't want it.
When Sony started charging for a subscribtion, the only choice for them was to give you free stuff. There is a decent amount of games that I own on both my 360 and PS3, and my only experience is much (not exagerating) better on XBL than than PSN. With XBL offering dedis for all games on X1, my guess is that XBL will be suprior to PSN again.
Crysis 360 is one of the prettiest console games, especially given the scale.
Keep telling yourself that.
Have it running on my Surface RT. The new multitasking modes and the small tiles are really useful. By the way, the FB live tile is pretty boring. It only shows new updates right?
Were you also told why it took a rumour to inform the community? How long were Sony going to wait before telling?
I don't get why people lose their shit when people call Beyond/Heavy Rain a QTE fest yet bash Ryse for it.
If it really is delayed, it's kind of a dick move on Sony's part for not announcing it so close to launch.
Had some flashbacks to the 'DelayStation 3' days, lol.
Also, I'm waiting for the inevitable clockbait rumour in which some unnamed industry insider claims that PS4 hardware is causing the delay of DC and WatchDogs.
Doesn't excuse them from slacking off.
Shame on Microsoft for recommending me games based on the games I own and play a lot!
To answer your questions, yes I am one of those people. Speaking of the recommended thing, I've actually bought some titles on Xbox 360 I've never heard of thanks to the recommended tile. No regrets there.
Their Lumia 1020 review was even worse. They should be sued for spreading so much misinformation.
I don't understand why people dismiss RT for not beeing able to run legacy code though. Even with a wasteland of an appstore, Widows RT is a very capable OS. It's not as open as Android, but it sure as hell can do a lot more than iOS. Speaking of iOS, people emphasize apps on it so much that the OS itself is basically an app launcher, nothing more :/
When devs actually did this and the PS3 quite often came out as inferior, it was because of "lazy devs".
I see tremendeous potential for (big screened) Windows Phones in the Asus Padfone concept. But I don't think they've executed it well. In the phonepad concept, both the phone and tablet are fully functional standalone devices. Kind of dumb.
I would like to see a Windows "PadPhone" concept in which the tablet screen in an extention of the phone, not a fully fuctional tablet. The tablet makes the Padfone quite expensive too. If that tablet were just a screen and a battery, cost would be much lower. MS should really do this. I'm quite 'mad' at MS for not doing something like this really.
If the rest of the UI looks good and that page godawful, it means the UI is inconsistent.
Based on the absolutely stupid and false critisism the RT gets, I'm not surprised. But the device doesn't deserve to be neglected that much.
So what you're saying is essentially "Microsoft is lying about cloud computing because they have no tech demo". I guess Sony lied about the SPE's too. Nobody knew what those were for until 2008.
Sony pushed the PS3's special SPE's way more than Microsoft is pushing Cloud Computing. We didn't see the benefit of SPE's until years after launch. The first games if I recall correctly that described how SPE's aided their rendering was Killzone 2, released in 2009.
How can you even measure something like that.
Not surprising since Xbox Live is smoother/less lag than PSN. I've bought Tekken Tag 2 for both PS3 and 360, PS3 4green bars plays like Xbox 360 orange/yellow bars.
Instead of making snarky sarcastic comments. You'd do better to explain to him what you think is wrong with his comments. Instead of posting things like "Better defend RT again." which don't exactly help at the moment.Long wall full of quotes
Instead of making snarky sarcastic comments. You'd do better to explain to him what you think is wrong with his comments. Instead of posting things like "Better defend RT again." which don't exactly help at the moment.
Stupid descision to force it upon people in the first place, Only this past week MS are bragging about selling 80m consoles and yet of that usebase only 24m bought Kinect.
Surely that should tell them that the vast majority of thier customers almost 3/4 quarters coudnt give a toss about Kinect.
Ah, you're right. My bad. Still think that proper counters/replies would have been better.The first one made it pretty obvious. He is accusing the guy of being a shill.
That's more than bought Halo 4, should they stop making Halo games?
Ah, you're right. My bad. Still think that proper counters/replies would have been better.
If you're going to take the trouble to re-post part of his post-history and make comments on each of those posts, yes.What do you mean by that? It's a snippet of his post history, want me to reply to every one of them in ancient and locked threads?
If you're going to take the trouble to re-post part of his post-history and make comments on each of those posts, yes.
Man that was a lot of effort for posts
Then why did you reply(as sarcastic as those may have been) at all to those old posts? Those quotes alone, without comments on every single quote, already gets your point across.That makes no sense. I'm trying to point out his extremely strong fondness of everything Microsoft. He has access to a heap of Microsoft hardware. He gushes over what Microsoft are doing at every turn or he defends it. He always has a Sony quip up his sleeve.
Point being, I'm trying to paint him as a shill.
Why the fuck would I reply to his shit from old and locked threads? Derp.
Then why did you reply(as sarcastic as those may have been) at all to those old posts? Those quotes alone, without comments on every single quote, already gets your point across.
Look I'm not defending anyone here, just trying to understand.