Article: http://america.aljazeera.com/articl...oversoutherncaliforniahighschoolasmascot.html
Perhaps in light of recent news about the Washington Redskins being urged to change their name, Al-Jazeera America has reported that the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) has called on the Coachella Valley High School in California to stop using their school mascot because they claim that it's "harmful" and "demeaning". Quite a difficult move considering the logo is already on numerous school clothing and merchandise but interestingly the school's superintendent has organised a telephone call with the ADC to discuss the matter.
However, the article points out that one alumni student does not feel that the mascot is - in any way - offensive.
The mascot logo in question (image source: Wikipedia)
The logo was chosen back in the 1980s according to this video that shows the different logos used since the school began adopting an Arab mascot in the 1920s.
Seems that we've been down this road before. Personally, from the facial characteristics of that logo I can see why it can deemed offensive but a simple logo update can solve this issue. I do not believe the school should completely abandon all it's Arab image considering the non-malicious history behind it..
So, political correctness gone overboard or does Coachella Valley High School need to get a new logo? Discuss.
Perhaps in light of recent news about the Washington Redskins being urged to change their name, Al-Jazeera America has reported that the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) has called on the Coachella Valley High School in California to stop using their school mascot because they claim that it's "harmful" and "demeaning". Quite a difficult move considering the logo is already on numerous school clothing and merchandise but interestingly the school's superintendent has organised a telephone call with the ADC to discuss the matter.
Superintendent Darryl Adams said:"I look forward to discussing the matter," he said. "I definitely understand the sensitivity of it. We need to make adjustments and work together."
As an African-American from the deep South, Adams said he is sensitive to racial stereotypes. He admitted that when he first saw the school's "Arab" mascot, "it raised an eyebrow for me."
[...]
"The fact that this is not malicious leads me to believe that we can reach some sort of understanding and agreement with the school board and city as to a name change and change of mascot," he said.
However, the article points out that one alumni student does not feel that the mascot is - in any way - offensive.
Alumni student David Hinkle said:"I don’t think it can be viewed as offensive," he said. "I don’t think the images they have now are offensive."
He pointed out that the mascot has evolved over the years from a turbaned Arab on horseback carrying a lance, in the 1920s, to a young man in a fez holding a scimitar and an old man with a growling face and gold tooth, in the 1950s. The mascot changed again in the 1980s, after a group of Saudi Arabian visitors suggested the fez be changed to a hijab.
"Their reasoning was that Saudi Arabia was no longer under French rule; therefore, Saudi Arabians no longer wore the fez as their headdress," reads an explanation on the alumni association’s website.
Of course, the story may not be entirely accurate — as the hijab is the headscarf of Muslim women, the French never occupied Saudi Arabia and the fez, which originated in Morocco, owes its popularity in the Middle East to the Ottomans.
Nevertheless, Hinkle insisted that the high school’s mascot is not demeaning.
"I don’t think it's meant to be insensitive," Hinkle said. "It's been that way for 50 or 60 years."
Al Jazeera America (photo source) said:
Al Jazeera America (photo source) said:
The mascot logo in question (image source: Wikipedia)
The logo was chosen back in the 1980s according to this video that shows the different logos used since the school began adopting an Arab mascot in the 1920s.
Seems that we've been down this road before. Personally, from the facial characteristics of that logo I can see why it can deemed offensive but a simple logo update can solve this issue. I do not believe the school should completely abandon all it's Arab image considering the non-malicious history behind it..
So, political correctness gone overboard or does Coachella Valley High School need to get a new logo? Discuss.
inb4aladdinreferences