• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Tintin book is crude, racist and must be banned, says watchdog

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ripclawe

Banned
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/children/article2062157.ece

A cartoon adventure featuring Tintin, the heroic Belgian journalist, should not be sold in Britain, the Commission for Racial Equality said yesterday.

The racism watchdog said that it was unacceptable for any shop to sell or display Tintin in the Congo, a comic book written in 1930 that features crude racial stereotypes.

A spokeswoman said that the book, which includes a scene featuring Tintin being made chief of an African village because he is a “good white man”, was highly offensive. “This book contains imagery and words of hideous racial prejudice, where the ‘savage natives’ look like monkeys and talk like imbeciles,” she said.

“How and why do Borders think it’s OK to peddle such racist material?” The commission said that neither high street nor specialist shops should stock it. “The only place that it might be acceptable for this to be displayed would be in a museum, with a big sign saying ‘old-fashioned, racist claptrap’.”

Egmont, which publishes the book, said that every edition delivered to shops had a band of paper around the outside making clear the content is offensive. A warning notes that it features “bourgeois, paternalistic stereotypes of the period — an interpretation some readers may find offensive”.

Hergé, who drew the story in the late 1920s, later admitted that the books were offensive, and apologised. “Concerning Congo as well as Tintin in the Land of the Soviets, the fact is that while I was growing up, I was being fed the prejudices of the bourgeois society that surrounded me,” he said. “It’s true that Soviets and Congo were youthful sins. I’m not rejecting them. However, if I were to do it again, they would be different.”

The current edition, the first in colour to be published in Britain, was released in 2005. It has been published in black and white in Britain for more than ten years. The commission was alerted to the book by David Enright, a solicitor who found it in the children’s section of Borders. “I was aghast to see page after page of representations of black African people as baboons or monkeys, bowing before a white teenager and speaking like retarded children,” he wrote.

“The book shows Tintin’s dog, Snowy, being crowned king . . . You are promoting the racist view that black people are disposed to violence and must be led, guided and commanded by white people and even dogs.” Mr Enright is white and is married to a black woman.

Borders said it was moving the book to its adult sections, but declined to withdraw it. “Naturally, some of the thousands of books and music selections we carry could be considered controversial or objectionable depending on individual political views, tastes and interests,” a spokesman said. “Borders stands by its commitment to let customers make the choice.”

51%2BivEx6dyL._SS500_.jpg
 

okno

Member
Do people not realize sometimes what YEAR things were made in? To ban a book from the god damn 1930s because of racial undertones is god damn stupid. I ****ing hate America so much sometimes.

also, ps, I'm enraged that Tintin, of all things, is being picked on. Tintin hardly ever made more than blip in the radar in America.
 

Teddman

Member
MassiveAttack said:
*Hugs massive Tintin book collection from childhood*
Me too. Loved those oversized books, along with Asterisk & Obelix.
okno said:
Do people not realize sometimes what YEAR things were made in? To ban a book from the god damn 1930s because of racial undertones is god damn stupid. I ****ing hate America so much sometimes.

also, ps, I'm enraged that Tintin, of all things, is being picked on. Tintin hardly ever made more than blip in the radar in America.
A cartoon adventure featuring Tintin, the heroic Belgian journalist, should not be sold in Britain, the Commission for Racial Equality said yesterday.
 
okno said:
Do people not realize sometimes what YEAR things were made in? To ban a book from the god damn 1930s because of racial undertones is god damn stupid. I ****ing hate America so much sometimes.

also, ps, I'm enraged that Tintin, of all things, is being picked on. Tintin hardly ever made more than blip in the radar in America.


A cartoon adventure featuring Tintin, the heroic Belgian journalist, should not be sold in Britain, the Commission for Racial Equality said yesterday.

Reading ftw!
 

Armitage

Member
okno said:
Do people not realize sometimes what YEAR things were made in? To ban a book from the god damn 1930s because of racial undertones is god damn stupid. I ****ing hate America so much sometimes.

also, ps, I'm enraged that Tintin, of all things, is being picked on. Tintin hardly ever made more than blip in the radar in America.

Article said:
A cartoon adventure featuring Tintin, the heroic Belgian journalist, should not be sold in Britain, the Commission for Racial Equality said yesterday.
.

Dammit Stoney.
 

Blackace

if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
okno said:
Do people not realize sometimes what YEAR things were made in? To ban a book from the god damn 1930s because of racial undertones is god damn stupid. I ****ing hate America so much sometimes.

also, ps, I'm enraged that Tintin, of all things, is being picked on. Tintin hardly ever made more than blip in the radar in America.

AMERICA IS THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE


I liked Tintin when I was a kid.. but even then I felt odd when some oil dark, big pinked lipped characters showed up.. that was before I even knew about racism..
 
Blackace said:
DDK has a tube of that.. I was going to buy some in Taiwan.. but forgot when I went

A Taiwanese friend told me about it years ago.

All you can do is laugh...Of course their culture is just responding to a sterotype but still it reminds you of how difficult it is to be a black kid and grow up with a positive self image and self worth.
 

Cdammen

Member
LET'S REWRITE HISTORY!

Because that's what they will be doing if the change Tintin. Do they censor/change old movies to make them more appropriate for today's audience? Oh wait! They do!

Creativity and art should not be compromised.
 
Tintin in the Congo is racist? SAY IT AIN'T SO!

I thought this was well known, and that before Blue Lotus, Herge was kind of a dick when making his books.

I think Congo and Land of the Soviets aren't really marketed towards children anyways, and were more of an adult thing to have for history, etc.
 

Blackace

if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
Cdammen said:
LET'S REWRITE HISTORY!

Because that's what they will be doing if the change Tintin. Do they censor/change old movies to make them more appropriate for today's audience? Oh wait! They do!

Creativity and art should not be compromised.

There really isn't an easy answer for this. Because I enjoyed Tin Tin and all that. But it is still painful as an adult to see such images. The 30s isn't that long ago. my father was born in 1935 so people from that age still live, and most likely their ideas do too. Just because in the 30s people were racist doesn't make it ok for today. And I am not saying Tin Tin needs to be removed and edit or anything like that. But just saying in the 30s people were like that, doesn't make it cool. And yeah certain forms of entertainment are not acceptable today at all... by the logic of what you say, we should just be happy with black face comedy or buck tooth chinamen in cartoons..
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Borders said it was moving the book to its adult sections, but declined to withdraw it. “Naturally, some of the thousands of books and music selections we carry could be considered controversial or objectionable depending on individual political views, tastes and interests,” a spokesman said. “Borders stands by its commitment to let customers make the choice.”
A perfectly appropriate and desirable response.
 

Cdammen

Member
Blackace said:
And yeah certain forms of entertainment are not acceptable today at all... by the logic of what you say, we should just be happy with black face comedy or buck tooth chinamen in cartoons..
Well... we shouldn't be happy with current cartoons making use of stereotypes. I'm just saying that what's done is done and stands as a statement and a reminder of how stupid and ignorant we were in the old days.

I hate when people homogenize and alter culture to fit today's society. What's done is done. Move on, make a better future. Stop looking back! :)
 

Blackace

if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
Cdammen said:
Well... we shouldn't be happy with current cartoons making use of stereotypes. I'm just saying that what's done is done and stands as a statement and a reminder of how stupid and ignorant we were in the old days.

I hate when people homogenize and alter culture to fit today's society. What's done is done.

but showing a rerun of Bugs Bunny going "Mammy!" sucks.. badly.. you can't really defend it with "Well that's how it was"
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Blackace said:
but showing a rerun of Bugs Bunny going "Mammy!" sucks.. badly.. you can't really defend it with "Well that's how it was"
Erasing it from history isn't what should happen though...

But maybe, just maybe some of these old properties should be made available to people old enough to understand what they're absorbing from a historical context. Tintin in the adult section? All good by me. Uncut old theatrical cartoons on DVDs with disclaimers? Also perfectly fine.
 

Cdammen

Member
Blackace said:
but showing a rerun of Bugs Bunny going "Mammy!" sucks.. badly.. you can't really defend it with "Well that's how it was"
No no, they shouldn't alter it and they shouldn't even show it on TV. Just leave it in a museum or something. I cringe whenever I see such blatant stereotypical portrayal :)

Dan said:
Erasing it from history isn't what should happen though...

But maybe, just maybe some of these old properties should be made available to people old enough to understand what they're absorbing from a historical context. Tintin in the adult section? All good by me. Uncut old theatrical cartoons on DVDs with disclaimers? Also perfectly fine.
Sound like a good idea.

(EDIT) Hey, If Hitler's Mein Kampf can be released and unaltered. These things must exist to remind us of how ****ing stupid we were back then. Like Dan is saying, erasing them from history is not a good thing... but yeah, limiting the distribution is a good way to go.

I have the Disney Treasures Donald DVD (1934 - 1941) and that one contains warnings and an introduction trying to explain why things are portrayed as they are.
 

cicero

Member
Blackace said:
There really isn't an easy answer for this. Because I enjoyed Tin Tin and all that. But it is still painful as an adult to see such images. The 30s isn't that long ago. my father was born in 1935 so people from that age still live, and most likely their ideas do too. Just because in the 30s people were racist doesn't make it ok for today. And I am not saying Tin Tin needs to be removed and edit or anything like that. But just saying in the 30s people were like that, doesn't make it cool. And yeah certain forms of entertainment are not acceptable today at all... by the logic of what you say, we should just be happy with black face comedy or buck tooth chinamen in cartoons..
They still regularly air The Jazz Singer with Al Jolson doing his Mammy number in full blackface. While being unacceptable today, I don't think that the blackface performance should negate its historical and artistic value.
4pbbmfp.jpg
 

MetatronM

Unconfirmed Member
Blackace said:
but showing a rerun of Bugs Bunny going "Mammy!" sucks.. badly.. you can't really defend it with "Well that's how it was"
I don't believe it's either wise or healthy for a society to hide from its past indiscretions. Bugs Bunny playing up racist black stereotypes SHOULD be shown, with the appropriate disclaimers, to remind people of what things were like. Disney has done a pretty good job of putting material like that out there with its Disney Treasures line of DVDs, especially with WWII propaganda films, and they're doing it for exactly that reason.

These sorts of things are pieces of history, snapshots of time. It's like how Triumph of the Will is often shown in history classes and even film classes, despite being a Nazi propaganda film. It's impossible to truly know the past without experiencing it.

Putting this Tintin book in the kids' section was probably a dumb idea, but it shouldn't be pulled just because it's not politically correct, especially when it already bears a warning and disclaimer from the publisher about its content.
 

human5892

Queen of Denmark
There's no question that putting a book like this in the children's section is crossing a line, but moving it to the adult section is a perfectly acceptable solution. Completely banning even one book is a very dangerous path to go down.
 

Blackace

if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
MetatronM said:
I don't believe it's either wise or healthy for a society to hide from its past indiscretions. Bugs Bunny playing up racist black stereotypes SHOULD be shown, with the appropriate disclaimers, to remind people of what things were like. Disney has done a pretty good job of putting material like that out there with its Disney Treasures line of DVDs, especially with WWII propaganda films, and they're doing it for exactly that reason.

These sorts of things are pieces of history, snapshots of time. It's like how Triumph of the Will is often shown in history classes and even film classes, despite being a Nazi propaganda film. It's impossible to truly know the past without experiencing it.

Putting this Tintin book in the kids' section was probably a dumb idea, but it shouldn't be pulled just because it's not politically correct, especially when it already bears a warning and disclaimer from the publisher about its content.

I agree that we shouldn't hide our past. But just letting stuff run like nothing has changed isn't healthy as well... just saying. I know there is no easy answer.
 

Blackace

if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
cicero said:
They still regularly air The Jazz Singer with Al Jolson doing his Mammy number in full blackface. While being unacceptable today, I don't think that the blackface performance should negate its historical and artistic value.
4pbbmfp.jpg

we'd have to agree to disagree that it serves any artistic value.

human5892 said:
There's no question that putting a book like this in the children's section is crossing a line, but moving it to the adult section is a perfectly acceptable solution. Completely banning even one book is a very dangerous path to go down.


I am with this. 100%. I was just against the whole "well it happened so **** it" type of thinking.
 

Enron

Banned
Jesus Christ some ppl are too sensitive. As a "buck-toothed chinaman" (actually not chinese but who cares we all look the same to roundeye! har) I could care less about racial stereotypes. Hell, I think they are funny. Loosen up people!
 

Enron

Banned
Blackace said:
but showing a rerun of Bugs Bunny going "Mammy!" sucks.. badly.. you can't really defend it with "Well that's how it was"

Hey, I got an idea. Let's strike it from history and pretend it didn't happen! Works wonders for the japanese!
 

shuri

Banned
Herge felt terrible about it too. I was a big fan of Tintin back in the days,
As a kid, I never thought the congo locals talked were funny; it was just a crude french that they spoke with tourists that they are learned on the spot here and there by talking with them over the years.

I picked up a reprint of the original super oldschool printing version of Tintin in Congo about a decade ago, the drawings were incredibly crude and primitive, and I found out that some of the lines that they were in the original were lated edited in the version that are on the shelves.

I remember vaguely the part where Tintin gets capture or attacked during the night (it's pretty vague in my mind) and that his guide, the little black boy had ran away during the attack. In the morning the kid shows up asking if Tintin is okay and Tintin says something like 'there you are, you cowardly little negro!" or something along that.

I remember being "wtf". I'm pretty 99% sure that they are refering to the reprint of the old version (the one that was published as weekly strips in a newspaper back in the '30). The version with that cover that was linked to is the 'newer' edition that had all the drawings redone and all those 'you dumb negro!" comments taken out.

I don't really agree with you, Blackace; Herge felt horrible about the Congo adventures, you had to remember that in those times, racisms was at an all time high, especially in Europe, where if you werent white, you were trash. The world has completly changed since, hell, I think that the mindsets of people has more involved in the last 20 years than in entire story of humanity;

But Herge's Congo book was a product of its time. The man felt really sorry about it when he met an asian fan who told him about the racist overtones of the original movies. They became the best of friends, the guy became the inspiration for Yang, Tintin's reccuring friend that appeared in some of the best books, and he also helped Herge a lot about cultural differences and how to represent them in the books by helping him doing the researches for the next adventures.

Tintin was never about racism, Tintin was about crazy adventures in cool places and meeting new cultures. Not many of the books actually happened in France, it was always about visiting South America, slaving countries, China, Tibet. Tintin would always make local friends in each adventure, and they would refer to them in other books too from times to times.

The first original print of Tintin was a bit weird, but it's a product of its time; and the creator was really appologic later on.
 

Blackace

if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
Enron said:
Hey, I got an idea. Let's strike it from history and pretend it didn't happen! Works wonders for the japanese!

never said strike it from history.. why make something up to make a point? But really is it cool to just let kids see it and pretend like it is cool? Educate, acknowledge, but do not perpetuate.
 

Blackace

if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
shuri said:
I don't really agree with you, Blackace; Herge felt horrible about the Congo adventures, you had to remember that in those times, racisms was at an all time high, especially in Europe, where if you werent white, you were trash. The world has completly changed since, hell, I think that the mindsets of people has more involved in the last 20 years than in entire story of humanity;

I never really said how he felt about his books. And I fully remember what time they were written, and am fully aware the the mindsets of people have changed since then. But again, the books have been edited once to reflect that change... and they don't need to be edited again, just no paraded in the kids section. They are a product of their time and not a teaching tool for today's kid.. just like blackface, just like bugs doing a chinese dance with slanted eyes and buckteeth..

Keep in mind I love Tin Tin.. but I can say I felt odd reading them at some points when I was a kid. Now more than ever race is out there. When I was a kid it wasn't really in the open like it is now.
 
I actually don't care about this and I'm pretty much am always free speech but all the people who proclaim "We can't rewrite history!" do make me laugh to a degree since we are re-writing the present currently all the time with censorsed song lyrics that stores won't sell, censored album covers that stores won't sell, edited movies that show on network TV, or simply NC-17 movies that theatres won't show.
 

Kabouter

Member
trilobyte said:
I got this as a poster in my room:
Are there even any Indians in that one?
I remember it just being about the mob and the only bit in the Wild West was with him being in cowboy clothes and finding that mobster somewhere in the Rockies or something.
 

No6

Member
Blackace said:
we'd have to agree to disagree that it serves any artistic value.
The Jazz Singer was used as a push for jazz (and by proxy, black culture) onto the mass cultural stage, and the racist limitations in the film industry prevented anyone but a white person in blackface from doing it. The artistic value of the film through its impact on mass culture is tremendous.
 
Kabouter said:
Are there even any Indians in that one?
I remember it just being about the mob and the only bit in the Wild West was with him being in cowboy clothes and finding that mobster somewhere in the Rockies or something.
Yeah the indians are there and they capture Tintin much like on the cover. I really remember why they do it though.

He escape by throwing tiny rocks on the face of one indian who then get pissed off at the chief. A big fight starts between the two and the next thing you know the entier village is fighting for no reason giving Tintin just enough time to escape.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Stoney Mason said:
I actually don't care about this and I'm pretty much am always free speech but all the people who proclaim "We can't rewrite history!" do make me laugh to a degree since we are re-writing the present currently all the time with censorsed song lyrics that stores won't sell, censored album covers that stores won't sell, edited movies that show on network TV, or simply NC-17 movies that theatres won't show.
You presume that people don't find a lot of that to be equally disagreeable...
 
Thank you for purchasing RoboHo! For optimal performance, please ensure your negrobot has an uninterrupted supply of malt liquor and welfare checks. WARNING: Do not expose your negrobot to snow, deep water, or ghosts. It is not recommended to let your negrobot sit-in for you when taking standardized tests.

Reverend Al Sharpton says, "Hey kids, don't forget! It is your DUTY to please that BOOTY!"
 

shpankey

not an idiot
i remember when they changed Aunt Jemima's appearance and story on the bottle.

still delicious though. :)
 

NekoFever

Member
And what a surprise, this relatively obscure book is currently 9th in the Amazon UK chart.

Personally I think moving this book to the adult section is absolutely the right thing to do. Is it suitable for children? Probably not. Should it be banned? Absolutely not. The banning of books is a far more dangerous thing to start doing than reading old books that present old attitudes in an appropriate context. Someone's already mentioned Mein Kampf which you could walk into any store and buy, although admittedly that's not the case in a lot of countries. You can probably guess most of them without clicking that link.

I can't really add to the praise for Disney bringing out their old cartoons when they still won't release Song of the South on DVD, though.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Adventures_of_Tintin#Criticisms_of_the_series


Bohlwinkel.jpg



The Shooting Star album originally had an American villain with the Jewish surname of Mr. Blumenstein. This proved to be controversial, as the character looked very stereotypically Jewish. Blumenstein was changed to an American with a less ethnically specific name, Mr. Bohlwinkel, in later editions and subsequently to a South American of a fictional country - São Rico. Hergé later discovered that 'Bohlwinkel' was also a Jewish name.[23]



Oh boy. Stereotypes everywhere. *starts burning tintin comics*
 
Glad to see the Commission for Racial Equality focusing on the real matters, like the B.N.P having a bloody fair in my village to spread their bullshit. Granted everybody pretty much votes the B.N.P where I'm from but still.

Some book most people have never heard of is now suddenly popular.

It's like telling terrorists not to make bombs.

If people want to buy it then let them buy it, but hell don't promote it.

Hell I'm tempted to buy it now.
 

cicero

Member
Blackace said:
never said strike it from history.. why make something up to make a point? But really is it cool to just let kids see it and pretend like it is cool? Educate, acknowledge, but do not perpetuate.
Only acknowledging, only educating, not no perpetuating. How in the world can you possibly do this without removing it from the general public? If it is available for sale or to read, then it is being perpetuated in some way. And what exactly is the standard that should be applied to what should or shouldn't be perpetuated? If it offends any segment or specific group within society?



No6 said:
The Jazz Singer was used as a push for jazz (and by proxy, black culture) onto the mass cultural stage, and the racist limitations in the film industry prevented anyone but a white person in blackface from doing it. The artistic value of the film through its impact on mass culture is tremendous.
Indeed, it was a huge commercial success as the first feature-length motion picture with synchronized dialogue sequences (talkie) and it signaled the end to the silent film era.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom