James Scott
Banned
Most devs are likely on NX development so comparing the final year when the system was delayed a couple months is disingenuousWii u had about 3 Nintendo games in 2016?
6 games a year?! sweeeeeeet
Most devs are likely on NX development so comparing the final year when the system was delayed a couple months is disingenuousWii u had about 3 Nintendo games in 2016?
6 games a year?! sweeeeeeet
WiiU has a dry spell in 2016 because Nintendo is shifting resources to the NX (which was delayed) while continuing to focus on the 3DS.Wii u had about 3 Nintendo games in 2016?
6 games a year?! sweeeeeeet
Of course. There's an implicit asterisk to the effect we're discussing the implications of something that could be true but has not been officially confirmed. That's still a valid line of discussion, though.While I do think Nintendo is aiming for software unification, I think people are taking the Eurogamer rumor too seriously. No matter how Credible Eurogamer may be, it's still a rumor, and like all rumors, it should be taken with a grain of salt.
Yeah I came here to post this.
It's a travesty they never released an actual AC game for Wii U, even though they already have all the HD assets made for the amiibo game and the AC crowd demo or whatever it's called.
They already made all the models in HD. (I believe this video explains it) They actually use these same HD models for Go and other HD mobile apps in addition to the 3DS games, though of course they use different lighting engines to get the look they want for a particular title.Instead of creating 700 models on a low resolution screen, Game Freak would have to create 700+ models IN HD.
I think the assets were made for a Wii U AC game, but that game was shuffled over to the NX once it became clear that the Wii U was a dead system.
Yep, this means Nintendo already has HD models for every Animal Crossing villager and HD models for every Pokemon ready to go. Which means those two series, which historically drive portable sales, will be in a good position to drive hybrid sales, as well, since they're already primed for HD.They already made all the models in HD. (I believe this video explains it) They actually use these same HD models for Go and other HD mobile apps in addition to the 3DS games, though of course they use different lighting engines to get the look they want for a particular title.
They just try to scale those models down for the 3DS but of course it doesn't work that well in regards to performance. lol
Yeah, if the quality is actually more home console than handheld, they'll took more time to develop. I'm worried about prices too...
Portability means being able to play anywhere you want at any time. That's especially appealing in places like Japan where virtually all traditional gaming is done that way. But it's also human nature to like options.Sweet?
What is sweet about handheld gaming compared to console gaming? Portability just means easier setup, not better game experience.
What is sweet about the power of console gaming from Nintendo being diminished in a anti-competitor defeatist stance?
If the news is true Nintendo has allowed themselves to be perverted by weak ideologies of its casual fans.
WiiU has a dry spell in 2016 because Nintendo is shifting resources to the NX (which was delayed) while continuing to focus on the 3DS.
Look back to 2014 or 2015, and combine the total number of 3DS games and WiiU games in those years for a better idea of Nintendo's yearly output when they're not in transition.
Hint: It's a lot of games. A lot of quality games. Enough to appease each system's fans in those years, and more than enough if all on one system.
Eliminating the drought should get the system off to a stronger start. And that stronger start should entice more companies to support it.
But we'll see. I think it's the best route they can take, and it appears they're taking it (if Eurogamer, Kotaku, IGN, etc, are to be believed).
Taking today's rumor out entirely, I still think it's worth tolling the virtues of nintendo consolidating their development.
If you look at nintendo's output every year across BOTH handheld AND console - they do quite a bit - but only the fans who own both systems get to benefit. I rarely feel like they're not putting out enough games because I'm always playing something on one system or the other.
It changes perception of drought, which is a good thing. Ideally nintendo's 'increased' output leads to a decent install base which leads to more 3rd party.
We'll see.
Keep in mind that this doesn't mean Nintendo is dedicating 100% of their resources to the NX. In fact, it's just a different distribution of resources.
Nah, it'll probably just look similar to Sun and Moon but in a higher resolution. And it'll probably be 720p (or worse) on your TV with a designed-for-handheld interface and no AA so it won't look too great anyways.As mentioned in the Eurogamer NX thread, this hybrid would force Game Freak into making a console-quality mainline Pokémon game, something that fans wanted for years.
From the sounds of the other thread, we're looking at something potentially stronger than WiiU here. If so, we'd get everything we have now, but better.Double-edged sword I would say. It's great to be able to enjoy all of Nintendo's offerings on one system, as I only have the 3DS and can't justify purchasing a WiiU for games like The Wonderful 101 or Tokyo Mirage Sessions FE. On the other hand, with Nintendo scaling back the power in order to accommodate the handheld/console hybrid, would those potential games that made me want to buy a Nintendo console in the first place be lost?
So? Portable experiences are inferior to non-portable experiences.Portability means being able to play anywhere you want at any time. That's especially appealing in places like Japan where virtually all traditional gaming is done that way. But it's also human nature to like options.
You're not too concerned because you don't see that releasing an underpowered console is going to kill Nintendo. You want Nintendo to be weak and Sony to be strong.In terms of power, I'm not too concerned. Most of the chip discussion in the other thread seemed to conclude this will at least out-perform the WiiU. If so, that's more than enough for me. I regularly play my PS4 but still think many WiiU games look gorgeous.
So it's fine Nintendo's third party support is dominated by Sony's third party support?If it's not enough power to attract third-party titles, that's fine. I have a PS4 for that. I buy Nintendo systems for Nintendo games. If the rumors are true, NX will have twice as many Nintendo games as any system before it, since it'll have 100% of the output instead of 50%.
That's pretty sweet.
The hell is this?So? Portable experiences are inferior to non-portable experiences.
I think an NX Pokemon game would look like Sun and Moon with improved lighting and textures at 720p, with a smoother frame rate, anti-aliasing, etc. Similar poly counts on character models, and similar level geometry, but with more bells and whistles enabled thanks to the inherent bump in power.Nah, it'll probably just look similar to Sun and Moon but in a higher resolution. And it'll probably be 720p (or worse) on your TV with a designed-for-handheld interface and no AA so it won't look too great anyways.
It can play Zelda: Breath of the Wild, Nintendo's biggest game to date. Should play a lot of those games just fine and having a (potentially) larger installbase would help Nintendo make these gamesDouble-edged sword I would say. It's great to be able to enjoy all of Nintendo's offerings on one system, as I only have the 3DS and can't justify purchasing a WiiU for games like The Wonderful 101 or Tokyo Mirage Sessions FE. On the other hand, with Nintendo scaling back the power in order to accommodate the handheld/console hybrid, would those potential games that made me want to buy a Nintendo console in the first place be lost?
Let's also talk about their gaming output focusing on games tailored for handheld gaming over traditional console blockbusters. Because that will be the eventual consequence to all this consolidation and a handheld as their primary platform.
Handhelds are weaklings to the console, the arcade, and the computer. Thus they produce inferior experiences. Pretty simple.The hell is this?
Depends on if they make handheld games, or console games.
It can play Zelda: Breath of the Wild, Nintendo's biggest game to date. Should play a lot of those games just fine and having a (potentially) larger installbase would help Nintendo make these games
I... apologize if I'm not being as aggressive as you think I should be!So? Portable experiences are inferior to non-portable experiences.
You're not too concerned because you don't see that releasing an underpowered console is going to kill Nintendo. You want Nintendo to be weak and Sony to be strong.
So it's fine Nintendo's third party support is dominated by Sony's third party support?
Everything in your post screams weakness.
I didn't hear that rumor about three SKUs. Can someone fill me in?The 3 SKUs rumor doesn't sound too good to me. Just make an amazing hybrid that has high quality Nintendo 1st party games and Japanese games and fight to get the huge Western games.
*Looks at 3DS output*Let's also talk about their gaming output focusing on games tailored for handheld gaming over traditional console blockbusters. Because that will be the eventual consequence to all this consolidation and a handheld as their primary platform.
Uhuh.Handhelds are weaklings to the console, the arcade, and the computer. Thus they produce inferior experiences. Pretty simple.
Handhelds are weaklings to the console, the arcade, and the computer. Thus they produce inferior experiences. Pretty simple.
I didn't hear that rumor about three SKUs. Can someone fill me in?
It means they can make a lot more big portable titles and mid tier console experiences. That's usually better than we get now a days. How many big blockbusters did Nintendo put out this gen? Xenoblade and Zelda?Let's also talk about their gaming output focusing on games tailored for handheld gaming over traditional console blockbusters. Because that will be the eventual consequence to all this consolidation and a handheld as their primary platform.
Not necessarily. Technically, the WiiU GamePad already allows you to enjoy console games on a portable form factor. This just removes the wireless tether and dramatically increases the number of games.Let's also talk about their gaming output focusing on games tailored for handheld gaming over traditional console blockbusters. Because that will be the eventual consequence to all this consolidation and a handheld as their primary platform.
But isn't that a 10k rumor? If so, it should be taken with a grain of salt.Apparently... the bomb will be dropped that Nintendo is actually doing a somewhat powerful Nintendo console AND this hybrid thing AND another thing.
It's weird that we can't determine the power yet despite knowing a couple of games for it.They could still make both kinds and do a lot of price ranges for the types of games they make.
It's also getting the new Sonic game.
What's your definition of a "big blockbuster?" I'd include both Smash Bros., both 3D Mario Karts, both 3D Marios, Mario Maker, Splatoon, etc.It means they can make a lot more big portable titles and mid tier console experiences. That's usually better than we get now a days. How many big blockbusters did Nintendo put out this gen? Xenoblade and Zelda?
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. However you look at it, it should be a marked improvement in terms of output.i'm hoping that the 15-20 games nintendo publishes a year mostly goes to nx. it makes sense if qol and mobile get some of that, but it should be a much better split than the juggling act they were performing with the handheld/console scene. nintendo doesn't need to build a fanbase on mobile in order to sell hardware in order to sell software - they can more or less take their time there. nx should be getting at least one first party game a month, on average.
But isn't that a 10k rumor? If so, it should be taken with a grain of salt.