cookie-monster
Member
Third pillar though
In the context of the reply, games that require powerful hardware. Since Smash and MK run on 3DS they don't.What's your definition of a "big blockbuster?" I'd include both Smash Bros., both 3D Mario Karts, both 3D Marios, Mario Maker, Splatoon, etc.
I... apologize if I'm not being as aggressive as you think I should be!
I think Nintendo coexists fine alongside Sony. And by focusing on one system and doubling their output, they'll balance their release schedule and avoid the droughts that occur on two systems. Not to mention that Nintendo will be the only one offering traditional gaming in the handheld space. That may be a niche market these days, but it'll be all theirs. Especially with the extra selling point of "also plays on your TV!"
And like I said, WiiU games look great. This potentially being better than WiiU only means good things.
I didn't hear that rumor about three SKUs. Can someone fill me in?
Nintendo is not coexisting with Sony anymore because they are not in their hardware generation.
Doubling their output goes against the "quality over quantity" core ideology of the company. It won't even help them because they're essentially going to fill in for absent third parties. These third parties will shit on the system just like they did the weakass Wii console because Nintendo is not taking the hardware race seriously, thus less serious games.
What is the point of Nintendo having a niche in a dead market? Let the indie devs or cellphone apps companies waste their time providing inferior experiences. Nintendo does not need to go downwards to join them.
You won't notice the difference between NX and Wii U because there won't be any if the specs are accurate. Just like how Nintendo released a "more powerful" Wii you are going to see the same effort here.
Nintendo has to return to power, not weakness. They cannot allow themselves to become perverted by casuals who are actively sinking the company into the ground.
^Breh lets wait til they reveal it
I don't like it all. I mostly play my 3DS at home or close to home so I'd rather just have a more powerful console that isn't held back by handheld limitations. Wouldn't this just cause more work for them in the long run?
Instead of creating 700 models on a low resolution screen, Game Freak would have to create 700+ models IN HD.
Yeah, so that's the upside of it, insted of having to split their resources between portable and big screen Nintendo can focus on just one system. Downside is, said system is likely going to be ipad 'portable' instead of 3ds portable and as a big screen console very underwhelming next to everything else out there. Meh..
The 3 SKUs rumor doesn't sound too good to me. Just make an amazing hybrid that has high quality Nintendo 1st party games and Japanese games and fight to get the huge Western games.
Apparently... the bomb will be dropped that Nintendo is actually doing a somewhat powerful Nintendo console AND this hybrid thing AND another thing.
But isn't that a 10k rumor? If so, it should be taken with a grain of salt.
From the sounds of the other thread, we're looking at something potentially stronger than WiiU here. If so, we'd get everything we have now, but better.
It can play Zelda: Breath of the Wild, Nintendo's biggest game to date. Should play a lot of those games just fine and having a (potentially) larger installbase would help Nintendo make these games
Yeah, I saw that. It's a good one *writes it down*Perverted by casuals...
Man, Nintendo news brings out the best in people it seems.
Pikmin and TMS? Definitely.Regarding my hypothetical musing it's more like, if WiiU had gone the hybrid route, would we have seen the likes of Xenoblade, Pikmin 3, TMS FE, The Wonderful 101, etc? I realize that Xenoblade did eventually get a 3DS port in Chronicles, but performance-wise it took a huge hit and was only playable on the New 3DS model.
Look at all the indie games on XB1 and PS4, though. The NX may not ever have great third party AAA support, but it could be a great home for indies and lower budget titles from big pubs.I feel like half of the 3DS-equivalent games that would've been made, won't, due to the budgetary constraints that arise from making a full fledged console game.
Sure, I just meant like the Bravely Defaults, all the Atlus RPGs, etc, that probably didn't have the resources of a let's say Persona, FF15 or even Tokyo Mirage Sessions. I'm excited about the console, just worried about the midrange titles having to up their game or not appearing at all.I'm seriously so excited for this new Nintendo software reality.
Look at all the indie games on XB1 and PS4, though. The NX may not ever have great third party AAA support, but it could be a great home for indies and lower budget titles from big pubs.
Ah gotcha, yeah, I'm worried about that too. I think there's room though. Consoles got Child of Light, Banner Saga, etc though The interest on the part of gamers is there if developers and pubs are willing to step up.Sure, I just meant like the Bravely Defaults, all the Atlus RPGs, etc, that probably didn't have the resources of a let's say Persona or FF15. I'm excited about the console, just worried about the midrange titles having to up their game or not appearing at all.
From the sounds of the other thread, we're looking at something potentially stronger than WiiU here. If so, we'd get everything we have now, but better.
Western 3rd parties:Western 3rd parties probably won't support it because spec wise it's underpowered.
Sure, I just meant like the Bravely Defaults, all the Atlus RPGs, etc, that probably didn't have the resources of a let's say Persona, FF15 or even Tokyo Mirage Sessions. I'm excited about the console, just worried about the midrange titles having to up their game or not appearing at all.
The handheld? That's cool. Way more than expectedIt's not potentially stronger. It will 100%, without a doubt, be stronger than Wii U.
The handheld? That's cool. Way more than expected
When it comes to Nintendo and third party support, it's best to keep your expectations low. I do see indie support being solid, though.Really hope NX gets better3rd party support than what the Wii U got.
I'm thinking Japanese support will be pretty solid.When it comes to Nintendo and third party support, it's best to keep your expectations low. I do see indie support being solid, though.
Sweet?
What is sweet about handheld gaming compared to console gaming? Portability just means easier setup, not better game experience.
What is sweet about the power of console gaming from Nintendo being diminished in a anti-competitor defeatist stance?
If the news is true Nintendo has allowed themselves to be perverted by weak ideologies of its casual fans.
That turn has been taken years ago. Please name me one single already released Wii U game that wouldn't make sense on handheld.Let's also talk about their gaming output focusing on games tailored for handheld gaming over traditional console blockbusters. Because that will be the eventual consequence to all this consolidation and a handheld as their primary platform.
The price would probably be different.I wonder what's going to happen to their more budget portable-designed games.
Would Link Between Worlds have happened in a world where this design choice happened earlier? Who would buy it after they just played a full 3D Zelda with glorious graphics?
Would Link Between Worlds have had better graphics in order to compete? But then, could it have been made as quickly by the same size team? If they'd had to devote more resources to a game like that, how would it have affected the rest of their release schedule?
I don't think Nintendo truly took full advantage of Wii U outside of Xenoblade and Zelda so it'll probably be nice to see them being able to use what they learned with the improved techAbsolutely.
This please.I think it's great that Pokémon and MH could potentially have WiiU or better visuals.
Right...is this just the 10k rumor? I thought he'd said hybrid and console, didn't hear about a third thing but maybe I missed it...or does this come from a different source, Meddling?
I'm pretty sure Iwata was the one that mentioned 3 potential SKUs. That with a NintendOS they could develop for multiple systems increasing the number of form factors instead of decreasing.Nah it came from 10K. Hahah I hope that 3 SKU thing isn't true
I wonder what's going to happen to their more budget portable-designed games.
Would Link Between Worlds have happened in a world where this design choice happened earlier? Who would buy it after they just played a full 3D Zelda with glorious graphics?
Would Link Between Worlds have had better graphics in order to compete? But then, could it have been made as quickly by the same size team? If they'd had to devote more resources to a game like that, how would it have affected the rest of their release schedule?
Nah it came from 10K. Hahah I hope that 3 SKU thing isn't true
I'm pretty sure Iwata was the one that mentioned 3 potential SKUs. That with a NintendOS they could develop for multiple systems increasing the number of form factors instead of decreasing.
I think it would've been made largely the same, really. The Zelda team will still strive to make more 2D Zelda games.
Oh, gotcha. Thanks. I hope so too. Sorry about the autocorrect on your name!
*Looks at 3DS output*
Yeaaaah, I'd wait for a bit longer to make such claims.
The Japanese 3DS and Vita devs gotta go somewhere. Why not the next handheld?
Like there are any Western handheld devs heh.