• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Your favorite game shows and your favorite moments in game shows

Status
Not open for further replies.

Boss Doggie

all my loli wolf companions are so moe
Gaming became caustic (not surprising) so I thought this thread is pretty apt - cherishing some nice game shows we all remember especially the funny moments.

Now sadly we probably won't see the "classic" style game shows. Nowadays it's all "Who Wants to be a Millionaire"-esque in presentation, as one gaffer said it before. Games nowadays focus on a dramatic and "survival"-style game shows, and those that do follow the classic old style are pretty much old brands to begin with.

I already gushed about how I love The Crystal Maze. So one of my favorite moments is this where the player couldn't figure out what to do with "U3".

But of course another memorable moments involve how the fuck people couldn't do the Shrine of the Silver Monkey.
 
tumblr_kq6ga8GTJN1qz8fgvo1_500.png
 
This is a dejavu thread from last week so I'll answer again.

My favorite game show was Love Connection w/ Chuck Woolery. That man was cool as hell.

Back in the day, Nickelodeon had some pretty good ones, Double Dare, and the sloppy obstacle courses.

Price is Right... could never get into it, seems like a huge television commercial for housewives.
 
He essentially "figured" out what to do right?
Yeah. The board wasn't actually random it just used enough different patterns to appear random to people who didn't think about it too much. He studied the patterns and knew exactly when to stop so he could hit the highest value squares and the ones that gave extra spins.
 
There's two current BBC gameshows I'm particularly fanatical about.

EPqLDLs.jpg


I adore Pointless. It's got the right balance of banter, friendliness, and genuine challenge, along with a fantastic - yet simple - risk/reward mechanic.

To explain for non-Brits: You're probably familiar with Family Fortunes/Feud. Pointless is superficially similar to that, but there's key differences.

First, the questions that are asked actually have explicit *correct* answers; this is not a subjective thing. Second, the people surveyed keep giving answers for a hundred seconds ("We gave 100 people 100 seconds to name as many... ... as they could" is the standard presentation).

The key thing, here, is that players are trying to get the lowest score; with the full 100 points awarded for an incorrect answer, and correct answers scoring the number of people who got it - so for a round of, say, "Countries beginning with C", China might score 80-odd, whereas Cambodia might be more like 25, and the Central African Republic is usually Pointless, scoring 0 points and putting that team in a very secure position.

Hence the risk-reward mechanic comes in - you can go for a secure answer, which will probably score highly, or if you can come up with a good obscure answer, you're going to score low. Plus, of course, there's the extra metric of using your judgement to figure out - if you have multiple answers in mind - which is actually the low-scoring answer.

This is all wrapped up in a delightful Cosy BBC Teatime Quiz wrapping. It's all friendly, with mild ribbing of just about everyone involved, and great banter between the host, the questionmaster (a different person who can offer facts and feedback about things, along with occasionally putting the host on the spot) and the contestants.

Plus, of course, it does no harm that the inevitable celebrity specials get to enjoy having the name "Pointless Celebrities".

As linked in the earlier thread, here's a few samples of the banter.
Pointless: A question about Sebastian Faulks
Pointless: A question about U2
Pointless: A question about Rick Astley

frezW4T.png


Possibly TV's toughest gameshow, and yet it never really seems to get snobbish about it. It does require the right mindset, though.

The recurring theme through the whole game is sets of four things with something in common. In the first round, you're shown things one at a time, and invited to buzz in when you think you know the connection. Try this fairly easy one, revealing each clue one at a time and giving yourself some thinking time. Bear in mind that the clues are pitched such that it gets more obvious as the question goes on.

5 points:
He’s my brother
3 points:
Well, nobody’s perfect
2 points:
Mein Fuhrer, I can walk
1 point:
It was Beauty killed the Beast

These are all
final lines in films (Return of the Jedi, Some Like It Hot, Dr. Strangelove, King Kong)

The second round is similar, except you're only told the first three in a *sequence*, and invited to give the fourth. Again, try revealing these one at a time.

5 points:
Rentenmark
3 points:
Reichsmark
2 points:
Deutschmark
... what comes fourth?

The answer is Euro; they are the changing currencies of Germany through the years

Or this one:

5 points:
Herbert
3 points:
Jefferson
2 points:
Walker
...

The answer is "Hussein", being the second names of US presidents coming up to the present.


The third round is glorious. Your team has a grid of sixteen clues that you have to sort into four connected groups of four. One point for each group you make within the time limit, one point for each connection you can explain in the wrapup, and a further two points if you do all that perfectly.

Fourth is a little out-of-place, in that you're given the category and are shown things in that category with the vowels removed and the spacing changed. F'rinstance, "Things said during a breakup", with "TSN TY TSM" becomes
IT'S NOT YOU, IT'S ME
. Quickfire against the clock.

And that's it. It's complicated, it revels in it's complicatedness (The first few series had players picking questions by selecting greek letters - the internal logic being that it was quite possible to have letters or numbers actually *in* the clues so it served to distinguish the question number from the content of the question). Because it - unjustly - got accused of being pretentious about that, they decided to scrap the letters, and at the start of the following season cheerily asked the first teams to... pick an Egyptian hieroglyph.

The thing about it, for me, is that the questions are fantastic. There's ones that are on the limit of gettability. You can be so proud if you get a five-pointer, but it does crop up occasionally (The first sequence example I gave I did so because it was the first question I ever got a five-pointer on). The questions are designed such that they get tougher as you go through the series, so the first few episodes should be gettable. Amusingly, the series is showing a few classic episodes on BBC2 currently, but for some reason The Powers That Be have picked some of the absolutely hardest Champion of Champions editions rather than some of the more accessible ones for a more mainstream audience.
 
Wow, Only Connect sounds glorious. I really love word puzzle and trivia gameshows that play with the format like that and Pyramid. Shame those are not used anymore save for a few ones.
 
One that I've got into recently is Schlag den Raab. Which... well, it's German, which for someone in the UK is a challenge, to say the least! But there's a bunch of UK-based game show enthusiasts who have started doing live commentaries on the episodes as they're screened, and that makes it rather watchable. It springs to mind now because there's an episode on in an hour or so, and they're planning to run commentary for this one, so if you're interested in following along, check out www.bothersbar.co.uk for the relevant links.

As for the game itself? The host is German TV personality Stefan Raab, although he's not *really* the host - he's a competitor. One participant is selected from a phone vote to play against him in a series of games, kept secret in advance from both the participants.

Not a small list of games, either; up to fifteen per episode. The first game being worth one point, the second worth two, meaning the viewers are guaranteed at least eleven to watch, and things get genuinely tense at the end

The prize is 500,000 euro in a rollover system; each episode it's unwon, it comes back for the next show. It doesn't operate on a fixed schedule - there's one episode every couple of months, and we're just coming back from the Summer break.

The real appeal of them, though, is the games. There's a few of a quizzy nature, a few strategic ones, and a few action ones, along with hybrids, and they're usually quite creative and tense. There's one point where they'll go outside for a couple of games that need a larger environment to play in (motorised races, for instance)

Memorable games. Names... if I can remember them:

Haidong Gumdo: A martial art involving chopping paper with a wooden sword; the objective being to be sufficiently smooth to cut the paper cleanly and straightly.

Ice football: Self-explanatory. Football played on ice. Not, it's important to highlight, on ice *skates* - on flat shoes, on ice, one-on-one. Hilarious.

Miniature table tennis: Ping-pong played on a half-size table. Actually genuinely a compelling game, despite looking absurd.

Molkky: A skittles-type game, but with very interesting rules. Each skittle is numbered, and you throw a block of wood at them. The key rules of note: if you knock over *multiple* skittles, you score the number you knock over. If you knock over just *one* skittle, you score the amount on it - so sometimes you'll want to knock down a cluster, and sometimes you'll want to single out a single target. Add to this the interesting rule that skittles are replaced *where* they end up, so there's also strategy in creating useful situations.

There was a game where there was a target shaped vaguely like a wedding cake on a pole, a circular pyramid with tiers - the contestants scored by throwing beanbags such that they *stayed* on a tier and didn't fall down. Again quite tense when a beanbag that was secure was knocked off.

There was a wood-chopping game, where with various blocks of 1kg wood you had to chop in pieces as close to 500g as possible.

They're unafraid of doing various races; there was one in a pedal car that went around the back corridors of the studio, they've done snowmobile racing, biathlons, go-kart racing

There was a game, the fifteenth and final game in a tense episode which required running to the other side of the studio and ringing a bell. However, with one major catch - are you familiar with Oasis, or other similar brands, blocks of green foamy stuff used by florists to make plant displays? The players had to tunnel through a massive block of that. For several million Euro, after the exhaustion of the previous fourteen games.

Basically, it's a grab-bag. You're never quite sure quite what you're going to get next. It's hugely varied, but the games are usually consistently at least hinging on an interesting idea.

One of the nice things about it that couldn't really happen on the UK schedules is that it's a live, open-ended programme. That is, it doesn't have a fixed end time, and the games are allowed to reach their natural conclusion; there was a notorious tablecloth-removing game that went on for ages.

So, yeah. I'll be settling down for the night with it, and we'll see how it goes!
 
I remember seeing some woman guess a multi-word puzzle on Wheel of Fortune with maybe one or two letters filled in.

That was pretty awesome. Think it was a year or two ago.
 
My all-time fav is the legendary turkey guy on Family Fortunes, especially for the look his family member gives him at the 18 second mark.
 
michael_larson_press_your_luck_5.jpg


Michael Larson - Press Your Luck

if you're interested in crazy game show shit and are not familiar with the legend of Michael Larson then you need to watch the doc on youtube below. This guy memorized the "random" patterns on Press Your Luck and basically played forever.

http://youtu.be/nzNMCXWCZzQ?t=1s

pour yourself a drink, watch it
 
Pointless and Only Connect

These would be my answers too. Pointless is great because of the banter between Richard and Xander, plus I've managed to "win" it quite a few times.

Only Connect is really good too because of how difficult it can be at times, yet unlike University Challenge there's still a chance you can answer. Then when you do you feel like a champ.
 
Michael Larson - Press Your Luck

I remember reading about him in a newspaper when this first came out. I heard some local stations replayed this episode due to its notoriety. They tried to make him as a cheater, saying what he did was similar to counting cards in blackjack. And I remember watching that documentary when it first came out. Dude was a mastermind.
 
I'm up to 31220 on this million second quiz app NBC is doing for their new show. It starts tomorrow though so I don't think they're going to pick me to be on it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom