• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

"Touchscreen interface is going to get Wii U further than Wii got" says Ubisoft

I think touchscreen is great, but it's certainly not going to get them "further" than their introduction of motion controls. Touch screen is been there done that, and not something that's going to appeal to as broad of an audience.
Bam, exactly my thoughts too. Most of the time something becomes so memorable and loved is because it broke new ground.
 
Are you going to get shocked everytime you will see GamePad being called a tablet? Because it happens in every thread and any interview about Wii U.

Mental laziness in not wanting to spell out WIIU GAMEPAD each time I'll excuse mostly. Trying to argue the device can be conceptually considered anything in the realm of a Kindle, iPad, or any other genuine tablet you can take out of the house because they are fully housed computer devices is when I start throwing out the accusations of you being a fantasist and need to get a grip.
 
Considering that 90% of your posts have been in Ninty threads, I'm willing to bet you'll get behind any logic that Ninty tells you is sound.
Don't go there. The rest of this thread is doing quite well explaining the differences. It doesn't need this console wars bullshit tossed into it.
 
I answered this already in this very thread: games, a web browser, youtube, instant messaging, video chat, panorama view, etc.

If the Kindle can be called a tablet, the GamePad can certainly too. I guess this is why everybody refers to it as... a tablet. Except a few ones apparently who have something about some company.

But they arnt running on the device there running on the wii u not the gamepad. I dont get how your not understanding.
 
Could be cool if creative minds do something really special with the screen. So far, I haven't seen much of anything that rises above "gimmick" status as far as uses go for that screen.
 
If the people who consider the game pad as a tablet consider vita a tablet too?coz they both aren't and anyways ubisoft has 2 exclusive games on the wii-u so ofc they will say such things
 
I dunno. Considering the large investment Ubisoft is pumping into the Wii U, they WOULD say such things, wouldn't they.

I think that's the opposite: they are putting big efforts in the console because they think that this interface could be appealing to a broader market
 
No it wont. Nursing homes and old women bought Wiis as exercise equipment. I doubt they will buy a WiiU because of a touchscreen.

The motion controls were something new that appealed to everyone. We already have touchscreen gaming and it can be had for 1.99.
 
In a cloud era I would assume would understand the logic.

Does it work via wi-fi, 3G or through any other internet protocol? Because I thought it just streamed stuff from the console. Which isn't cloud. Maybe you should look up the definition of that too.
 
Does it work via wi-fi, 3G or through any other internet protocol? Because I thought it just streamed stuff from the console. Which isn't cloud. Maybe you should look up the definition of that too.
The logic. You don't need apps to be installed on the device to make use of it.
 
I think that's the opposite: they are putting big efforts in the console because they think that this interface could be appealing to a broader market

I think both the ubi exclusive titles have been moneyhatted by nintendo otherwise rayman which is a multiplat franchise would be on the 360 too
 
Could be cool if creative minds do something really special with the screen. So far, I haven't seen much of anything that rises above "gimmick" status as far as uses go for that screen.

A gimmick in your eyes may not be in another persons. I think that being able to transfer your game to the tablet (this is especially nice for kids who don't have their own TV) and even display menus is pretty useful.

The tablet also means we could get something like a Pokemon Ranger game on the Wii U eShop. I may be in the minority, but I enjoyed the game.
 
The logic. You don't need apps to be installed on the device to make use of it.

Did you know the PSVITA is now a fully functional desktop PC running on Windows7 and so of course Steam and all of your steam library?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXZiychRKTI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJSp35ggE34
Because hurrrr durrr, thats whats on the screen larry.

Also:
b8ik0.jpg

This mirror is now a second HDTV! You can now totally refer to that mirror as a television device, because fuck words and definitions right?!

Also I feel like I need to report you to some form of international governing body with you constantly using the word logic. Some kind of word police.
 
Does it make any difference? Everybody call it a tablet because of its form factor and because of the purpose it fullfills inside the house. Can't you get behind this logic?
It can have same functionalities as a tablet indeed, but it is missing the portable element. When people think about tablets, they think of a portable device that they can use anywhere.

To take another example on this, i dont know how many of you that remember some of the first smartphones. These were not portable, but they were phones that required a landline to work. They had a screen and you could connect to the internet with them and do different stuff. Today however, when people think of smartphones, they think of cellphones, not those old phones.

I guess that you can technically call the the WiiU controller as some sort of tablet because it has the fuctionalities, the same as you can call those old phones for smartphones. But i'm sure that most people think of portability when they think of tablets and smartphones.
 
I can say I'm way, WAY more excited for the touchscreen than I ever was for the Wiimote


not sure how the masses will respond, though
 
I think what they are trying to say is that the fact that everybody is familiar with touchscreens will help boost sales of the Wii U, since it will feel more familiar to the casual crowd.

I can see it happening, but at the same time these same people are used to paying very, very little for their games, I have a hard time picturing them shelling out 50-60 for a game.
 
I think that's the opposite: they are putting big efforts in the console because they think that this interface could be appealing to a broader market

I think they are putting effort into the console because they don't want to be caught off guard in case lightning strikes twice for Nintendo.

I see them giving as much, if not more support, to the PS4 and 720 even though they likely won't have a similar interface.

They are just covering their bases the best they can. It's in their best interest to promote the Wii-U whenever possible. A great Wii-U launch improves the chances their software will sell better. I really don't think appealing to a broader market has anything to do with this since the market that will jump on a launch is rarely the broader market.

The logic. You don't need apps to be installed on the device to make use of it.

So the Dreamcast controller was a tablet with the VMU?

I think both the ubi exclusive titles have been moneyhatted by nintendo otherwise rayman which is a multiplat franchise would be on the 360 too

I don't think Nintendo moneyhatted anything. I think they just want to provide the Wii-U with exclusive support and the games already in development was the most cost efficient option.

Besides, they already said Zombie-U may appear on the PS3 and 360, right?
 
Concept for Wii:

Miyamoto has previously stated that user friendliness is central to the Wii, an idea that he reiterates in the interview. "I didn't want something that would make people nervous about trying to use it at first glance. Rather, the goal was to make anyone who sees it want to try it out. However, as someone who has always made games, it had to be capable of playing past software."

A touch screen, like a tv remote before it, is something pretty much everybody has experience with. I believe, like the wiimote, people want to hold this controller. Both have extra buttons that make them look more complicated then they really have to be, but once people experience what the controllers are at the base (wiimote - motion, Gamerpad - motion + touch) they understand how intuitive and user friendly they really are.

As for potential, the system is basically a combination of the Wii and DS. Developers have had time with each device/input now, therefore they should be able to create greater experiences with them this time around. Playing something like Pikimin 3, Rayman Legends, and Nintendoland proves that, when these inputs are combined, you can create extremely intuitive, deep gaming experiences that cannot be replicated anywhere else. This factor will be the one that could potentially create a phenomenon like the Wii, and I think if said phenomenon happens, it could be sustained much longer then the Wii.

Personally though, I think the WiiU is a bit too late (should of been released last year or earlier), but will undoubtly be a successful video game console in the end. Similar to the 3DS, I think it will be very popular in Asia, and semi-popular in America (yet do much better numbers then the 3DS in America because of the home-console market being THE gaming market here).
 
Could be cool if creative minds do something really special with the screen. So far, I haven't seen much of anything that rises above "gimmick" status as far as uses go for that screen.
I expect the most compelling 3rd party uses to come from the eShop. And even then, it's going to be mostly PC/iOS conversions.
 
I don't think Nintendo moneyhatted anything. I think they just want to provide the Wii-U with exclusive support and the games already in development was the most cost efficient option.

Besides, they already said Zombie-U may appear on the PS3 and 360, right?

Well if both rayman and zombi-u release day and date on multiple consoles i'd be more inclined to believe that,i don't think in this day and age any publisher is 'nice' enough to provide exclusive support to a new console over the current huge fanbase of the hd twins
 
Well if both rayman and zombi-u release day and date on multiple consoles i'd be more inclined to believe that,i don't think in this day and age any publisher is 'nice' enough to provide exclusive support to a new console over the current huge fanbase of the hd twins

You do make a point. Maybe Nintendo offered to help with marketing, which I understand is a form of moneyhatting.

I made my point then.

That you will believe what you want to believe regardless of how much it defies reality to the point of making other people just give up trying to reason with you?
 
That you will believe what you want to believregardless of how much it defies reality to the point of making other people just give up trying to reason with you?
i can perfectly live with the 5 of you who'll refuse to call it a tablet.
 
I think that Nintendo bringing the intuitive, touch-based "tablet-esque" controller into the living room with the power of a modern console is a very good bet for the company. Obviously, at this point, we can't really guess at how successful it will be but it has the potential to really draw in the average consumer (much like the wii did). It all comes down to software that showcases and sells the unique features.
 
It's already being used for the sorts of casualware that drove Wii originally (Just Dance 4, Wii Fit U, etc). Core games will probably avoid it in general, but that makes no difference to the mainstream.

I think the mainstream will just play such casualware on the wii rather than buy another console costing $250 or more


I think that Nintendo bringing the intuitive, touch-based "tablet-esque" controller into the living room with the power of a modern console is a very good bet for the company. Obviously, at this point, we can't really guess at how successful it will be but it has the potential to really draw in the average consumer (much like the wii did). It all comes down to software that showcases and sells the unique features.
What exactly do you mean here by a modern console?ps3/360 are not modern and the ps4/nextbox will be ahead of wii-u in terms of power most likely
 
It's not a tablet, geez. I guess you could call it tablet-lite, or tablet-like, or a 'tablet' for the home, but it's not a tablet. The Vita is more like a tablet, honestly. :lol

I personally like to think of it as a socially interactive, universal Gamerpad.
 
I think that Nintendo bringing the intuitive, touch-based "tablet-esque" controller into the living room with the power of a modern console is a very good bet for the company. Obviously, at this point, we can't really guess at how successful it will be but it has the potential to really draw in the average consumer (much like the wii did). It all comes down to software that showcases and sells the unique features.

I think software is the real problem at the moment. Nobody seemed to have an issue with the idea of the Wii U or the GamePad until E3, when the software line-up seemed somewhat sparse. It still does. Nintendo need to show more of what's to come in the future.
 
I think the mainstream will just play such casualware on the wii rather than buy another console costing $250 or more

I think that come Christmastime the mainstream will be looking for a big-ticket item to put under the tree. A Wii HD (it's hidef just like our new TV!) really fits.
 
You do make a point. Maybe Nintendo offered to help with marketing, which I understand is a form of moneyhatting.
Supposedly Nintendo's offering to match advertising dollars for all games within the launch window, exclusive or otherwise. It's one of the bigger developer/publisher incentives to draw support generally, another being just a 15% cut for eShop releases (Steam/iOS/XBL/PSN are all around 30% comparatively).

My guess is they probably gave a royalty cut for ZombiU and Legends in exchange for a 6-12 month exclusivity window or something. Legends itself started as an Origins port though I believe, and that game sold best on Wii originally, so it's not hard to see Ubi throwing Nintendo a bone with this one anyway.
 
Lol, how can people call the GamePad a tablet when it's completely dependant on the console? It's not a replacement for a tablet people, it's a controller with a touchscreen with lots of interesting implementations.
 
I highly doubt people are going to be running out and saying, "It's a new tablet!" (although marc seems to be doing so, which is ludicrous).

I think the more realistic reaction would be, "Finally we have touchscreen functionality on a console, just like the DS and iPad."
 
I think the mainstream will just play such casualware on the wii rather than buy another console costing $250 or more.

They will eventually upgrade to something. The ability to play both experiences (Wii and WiiU), the Gamerpad, new Just Dance, NintendoLand, Sing, new 2D Mario, and new WiiU Fit will be a pretty big incentive to upgrade for casuals, and it will continue to grow with Mario Kart U, WiiU Sports, etc.

The main problem though here is that, unlike the Wii, there is much more competition fighting for the casual gaming market, so they might instead choose to upgrade to something else.
 
I think the mainstream will just play such casualware on the wii rather than buy another console costing $250 or more
I dunno, they'll probably want the newest Wii Fit and NSMB games. A better version of Just Dance 4 doesn't hurt either.

Casuals don't seem to have much issue at all spending for new hardware generally, even unsubsidized.
 
I think that come Christmastime the mainstream will be looking for a big-ticket item to put under the tree. A Wii HD (it's hidef just like our new TV!) really fits.

I think apple products like the iphone 4s or 5,the new ipad or ipad mini if that is released this fall would fit that situation more though nintendo 'loyalists' are gonna buy the wii-u at launch anyways
 
Top Bottom