SodiumBenzoate
Member
http://www.techspot.com/article/1039-ten-years-intel-cpu-compared/
I found this really great article showing the relative performance of the most popular Intel processors from (almost) each generation since the introduction of the "Core 2" processors in 2006.
In synthetic benchmarks, the performance increases over time look pretty steady.
Gaming benchmarks, however, are another story. Here is Metro Redux, a relatively CPU-intensive game according to the article: (all benchmarks using a GTX 980 and as-similar-as-possible other components)
Considering the APU/GPU-heavy architecture of modern consoles, this trend isn't all that surprising. I wonder if this pseudo-flatlining of CPU importance is a permanent change in PC gaming going forward? Skylake comes out very soon, and I doubt that will change anything too significantly.
I found this really great article showing the relative performance of the most popular Intel processors from (almost) each generation since the introduction of the "Core 2" processors in 2006.
In synthetic benchmarks, the performance increases over time look pretty steady.
Gaming benchmarks, however, are another story. Here is Metro Redux, a relatively CPU-intensive game according to the article: (all benchmarks using a GTX 980 and as-similar-as-possible other components)
The 2500K came out in 2011 and is still performing ~90% as well as the current-generation chip. That's pretty amazing for 2500K owners.
Considering the APU/GPU-heavy architecture of modern consoles, this trend isn't all that surprising. I wonder if this pseudo-flatlining of CPU importance is a permanent change in PC gaming going forward? Skylake comes out very soon, and I doubt that will change anything too significantly.