• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

PCGAF: Past 10 Years of Intel Processors Compared

http://www.techspot.com/article/1039-ten-years-intel-cpu-compared/

I found this really great article showing the relative performance of the most popular Intel processors from (almost) each generation since the introduction of the "Core 2" processors in 2006.

In synthetic benchmarks, the performance increases over time look pretty steady.
Synthetic_02.png


Gaming benchmarks, however, are another story. Here is Metro Redux, a relatively CPU-intensive game according to the article: (all benchmarks using a GTX 980 and as-similar-as-possible other components)
The 2500K came out in 2011 and is still performing ~90% as well as the current-generation chip. That's pretty amazing for 2500K owners.
Considering the APU/GPU-heavy architecture of modern consoles, this trend isn't all that surprising. I wonder if this pseudo-flatlining of CPU importance is a permanent change in PC gaming going forward? Skylake comes out very soon, and I doubt that will change anything too significantly.
 
I thought getting my i7-3930k at the premium it was at three years ago might have been a mistake, but my LGA2011 setup is still a fuckin' champ.
 
My 2500k has been happily trucking along at 4.5ghz since 2011. I'll be upgrading for Skylake, but I'm not expecting anything super dramatic.
 
I got my i7-970 as some kind of promotional deal by working for Geek Squad (nabbed it for $200, came with a sweet heat sink/fan), so it's interesting to see that the difference between that (I assume it sits slightly above the 870) and the 4790k still isn't all that much.
 
One of my older computers has a 2500k that's been overclocked to 4.6GHz since day one, was probably one of my best purchases. Still feel no need to upgrade it at all yet.
 
2500K@4ghz represent

I figured this CPU would get me through the whole gen, which seems likely with the DX12 making CPUs even more efficient.

So it seems this CPU will last me some 8 years. Insane.
 
The single threaded performance increase in these 15 years is appalling honestly.

It hardly is; there's an upper limit to diminishing returns. What's appalling is how slow PC gaming applications (and I point to MS/Khronos/IHVs et al, not devs, mostly) have been in properly utilizing multiple cores. The spread in the gaming numbers will probably be a lot more interesting in a couple of years
 
Clicked expecting a 2500K thread lol.

I can't really think of another CPU that has held so well for so long over my 20+ years of PC gaming.
 
What about the jump from pentium 4 to the core 2 duo? That was pretty massive, no?

Like others here, I'm still a happy camper with my 2500k at 4.5Ghz.
 
My i7 860 still serves me well for everything I want to play. Very happy that no upgrade has been needed thus far.
 
I used an i7 975 overclocked to 4 Ghz for quite a while. Felt its relative slowness a little in video rendering, but for gaming its still rock solid. Alas, it now sits mostly unused in a conference room in my dad's office.

I don't know that Skylake will be the revolution that some are predicting especially compared to the efficiency of Broadwell, but I still think Intel will easily maintain their stranglehold on CPU performance.
 
2500K@4ghz represent

I figured this CPU would get me through the whole gen, which seems likely with the DX12 making CPUs even more efficient.

So it seems this CPU will last me some 8 years. Insane.

Same. I bought it when it came out back in 2011. I think this is the longest I've been able to keep using a single processor without feeling the need to upgrade.

Honestly, it's a bit disappointing how little advancement there has been in processor power when it comes to PC games.
 
Same. I bought it when it came out back in 2011. I think this is the longest I've been able to keep using a single processor without feeling the need to upgrade.

Honestly, it's a bit disappointing how little advancement there has been in processor power when it comes to PC games.

Hah, I make up for the cpu upgrade bug with gpu upgrades instead.
When I got this CPU in 2011 I got GTX 560Ti with it.
18 months ago I got AMD 280X.
2 months ago I got GTX 970.

All in chase of max details at 1080p at 60fps :)
 
Lets see a similar graph for graphics card performance....

Today's graphics cards are 50x faster than 10 years ago
 
I wonder if Intel regrets making the i5 2500k.

A £170 chip that still kicks it in the gaming side today. My one is on a diet of 4.4Ghz in summer, 4.6Ghz in winter and still is nowhere near being the bottleneck of my system. That would be my GTX 780, bought for £360. Insanity.

Also, AMD have had what, 4 years to catch up and...ouch.
 
I had a Q6600 from 07 to 11; I couldn't really use it to its potential because I had some shit awful OCZ ram. I don't think I really went past stock clocks either, might've been a bad mobo choice as well.

2600k since then, no issues at all. Hell, been using a 6950 since then as well. I haven't really made any upgrades. Maybe next year.
 
Glad I bought the 2500k when I did. Just bought a 980 Ti and it's good to know I won't have to worry too much about a bottleneck.
 
Not surprised, the only thing worth upgrading for are the new chipset peripherals and that's not a must-have for a lot of people.
 
I bought an i7 930 in 2010 and it was still extremely viable @ 3.9 Ghz when I replaced it and the i7 920 which for all intents and purposes is the same chip was actually released at the end of 2008.
 
the only that makes my (non overclocked) 2500K cry is GTAV, and most of my issues with it is due to my 1 GB VRAM GPU bought with it
 
Still rocking my i7 920, and don't see myself upgrading it any time soon either. Though to be fair I don't game on my pc as much as I used to, but will defo be looking to retire it by 2017 I guess.
 
Still rocking my i7 920, and don't see myself upgrading it any time soon either. Though to be fair I don't game on my pc as much as I used to, but will defo be looking to retire it by 2017 I guess.

I had an i7 920 as well up until last spring.

I overclocked it to 4ghz, and the processor loved it, but my EVGA motherboard didn't.
X58 boards are so expensive, it was better to just upgrade to my 4790k.
 
As well as showing how well older CPUs are holding up, it really should give confidence to people looking to put together a gaming PC on a budget. All the talk in the gaming PC thread about 'wait for skylake' seems unnecessary unless you want the cutting edge. Just get a current CPU or even look for used 2500k/3570k options to keep costs down, and pump any excess into the GPU.
 
Top Bottom