• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

CNN: Tulsi Gabbard under consideration for Trump administration, meeting today

Status
Not open for further replies.
This seems like a total impossibility and essentially a distraction.
 
I can't imagine she'd want the position? If trump goes off the rails as everyone predicts would she want to be part of that train wreck?
 
I don't like this at all.

I keep hearing about islamophobia about hear, but don't know what she has exactly said about Islam.

She grilled Obama for not using the phrase "radical islamic terrorism" and doesn't trust Pakistan nor Saudi Arabia. Which is a pitiful thing to use to label her an islamophobe, unless I'm missing something much more nefarious than that.
 
Who considered her a decent contender for 2020? lol


Her seat is safe for Democrats, if Gabbard wants to go then she can go. She'll have to bear the baggage later.
 
Seems like he's putting on a show. I doubt Gabbard wants to be tainted by working for the Trump administration when I have no doubt she has higher political aspirations later.
 
Maybe he was like:

"we need a Democrat"

"No I don't care about their accomplishments, just show me pictures"

I dunno.

I guess they kind of line up internationally based on her Wikipedia?
 
imrs.php

Wanting to bomb ISIS or Al-Qaeda doesn't make you an Islamophobe, a warhawk, maybe.
 
Berners just creamed themselves.

Not sure how to take this post.

Anyway, I hope Trump can find a somewhat sane Republican for that position. Because bringing a firebrand Democrat like Tulsi into the fold could make things incredibly painful for the Dem side down the line.
 
imrs.php

Wanting to bomb ISIS or Al-Qaeda doesn't make you an Islamophobe, a warhawk, maybe.

Yea sounds warhawk not Islamophobe.

I don't see the harm I guess--I wonder if this will empower her within the Dems or weaken her ties.


SO MANY SMOKESCREENS THOUGH! WAKE UP PEOPLE /s
 
I remember lots of people calling her name back in the "Whos running for the democrats in 2020?" (or sth like that) thread, now she's suddenly a racist and islamophobe?
 
I remember lots of people calling her name back in the "Whos running for the democrats in 2020?" (or sth like that) thread, now she's suddenly a racist and islamophobe?

People have been hurling that accusation before "now".

I happen to think it's unfair if not straight up bullshit unless there's something else I'm not aware of.
 
She seems great except for the islamophobia part I keep hearing about, but noone tells me why.
Not hard to do some research on your own about Tulsi Gabbard.

Written in 2012:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/1/20/1056467/-
A tax-exempt charitable organization co-founded by Tulsi Gabbard Tamayo has been promoting her campaign for City Council on its website, prompting other candidates in the race to cry foul.
...
The nonprofit Stand Up for America was founded by Tamayo and her father, state Sen. Mike Gabbard, after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to promote patriotism and America's unity as "one nation under God." It is exempt from paying income taxes and may receive tax-deductible contributions as a charitable organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service code.

Such nonprofits may not endorse political candidates. Since mid-July, Stand Up For America's website has featured a news release from the Tamayo campaign announcing her candidacy, highlighting her "record of proven leadership," and including quotations from Tamayo and a link to VoteTulsi.com, her campaign website.

Tamayo is vice president of the nonprofit and her father is its president. Contacted Friday, Tamayo said she didn't realize the news release and campaign link were on the nonprofit's website.

"It was an honest mistake from a volunteer," Tamayo said. "I'm very, very sensitive to the perception of impropriety. I wasn't aware that the press release was posted on there. I need to talk to the volunteer who helped with the website and we'll get that corrected immediately.

"I hadn't been to our Stand Up for America website recently so I didn't know that that was up there," added Tamayo, a former state legislator who represented Waipahu and Ewa.

As of yesterday the site no longer included the news release and link.
...
In its latest IRS tax filing, a short form, Stand Up for America reported receiving less than $25,000 in 2009. The most recent event held by the organization, according to its website, was a parenting seminar by John Rosemond in 2007.
Ali Riggs (“Riggs”) is the secretary/treasurer of SUFA and her comment above is a clear admission of wrongdoing by an officer of SUFA. Hardly a "mistake from a volunteer," as Tulsi Gabbard Tamayo (“Tamayo”) claimed in the article.
...
There is virtually no separation between Senator Mike Gabbard and candidate Tamayo's political activities and SUFA. In fact, both the "Stand Up for America" and the "Mike Gabbard for Senate" CONTRIBUTION FORMS share the same telephone number and email address (compare below).
But does Stand Up have a purpose other than promoting Tamayo? The organization exists, formally, to promote patriotism and "America's unity as 'one nation under God.'" But it hasn't done anything since a 2007 lecture series it sponsored and a 2005 "Raise a Purple Finger for Freedom" campaign in solidarity with Iraq's first national democratic elections. It took in less than the required minimum in 2009 to necessitate a full Form 990 filing. It may be virtually nonexistent, but the SUFA website contains a long, effusive paean to Tulsi Tamayo that does a great job in describing her many wonderful qualities, but seems to have little connection to any charitable purpose of the organization. Sorry, but the Tamayo explanation doesn't ring true. The organization appears to be little more than a vehicle for whatever Gabbard and Tamayo want to say and do, which appears at the moment mostly to be concerned with Tamayo's political future. And that's not a convincingly 501(c)(3) purpose.
All those people pushing Tulsi Gabbard are only pushing her because 1) she supported Sanders, and therefore somehow became a "liberal icon" despite having much worse LGBT views and 'journey' than Hillary Clinton and 2) she was viewed at the surface level of "oh check out her credentials as military, woman, minority, young, checks all the boxes!" without even a basic vetting from those who are 'excited' about Gabbard.
 
'under consideration' means absolutely nothing at this point. We don't know what's spinning around in Trump's head, not even he does.
 
Sessions is attorney general, Brannon from BreitBart is head of press in the White House, and Donald Trump is going to be the president.

I feel we're at a point where nothing can be ruled out anymore.

We can rule out of having any voices in the president's administration that aren't dyed in the wool conservative/alt-right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom