• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

"Pokemon Go increased Traffic Deaths and Accidents" study found

llien

Banned
In the provocatively titled "Death by Pokemon Go" (which has been shared online but has yet to be peer-reviewed), Purdue professors Mara Faccio and John J. McConnell studied nearly 12,000 accident reports in Tippecanoe County, Indiana, in the months before and after Pokemon Go's July 6, 2016 launch. The authors then cross-referenced those reports with the locations of Pokestops in the county (where players visit frequently to obtain necessary in-game items) to determine whether the introduction of a Pokestop correlated with an increase in accident frequency, relative to intersections that didn't have them. While the incidence of traffic accidents increased across the county after Pokemon Go's introduction, that increase was a statistically significant 26.5 percent greater at intersections within 100 meters of a Pokestop, compared to those farther away. All told, across the county, the authors estimate 134 extra accidents occurred near Pokestops in the 148-day period immediately after the game came out, compared to the baseline where those Pokestops didn't exist. That adds up to nearly $500,000 in vehicle damage, 31 additional injuries, and two additional deaths across the county, based on extrapolation from the accident reports.

The study uses a regression model to account for potential confounding variables like school breaks and inclement weather, which could cause variation separate from Pokemon Go. The model also compares Pokestops to Pokegyms (where it was nearly impossible to play while driving) to account for the possibility that generally increased traffic to Pokemon Go locations was leading to more accidents, even among drivers who stopped and parked before playing. In all cases, though, being able to compare to intersections without a Pokestop and to the same dates the year before, helped provide natural control variables for the study.
Source (ars.technica)


Abstract:
Based on detailed police accident reports for Tippecanoe County, Indiana, and using the introduction of the virtual reality game Pokémon GO as a natural experiment, we document a disproportionate increase in vehicular crashes and associated vehicular damage, personal injuries, and fatalities in the vicinity of locations, called PokéStops, where users can play the game while driving. The results are robust to using points of play, called Gyms, that cannot be used to play the game while driving as a placebo. We estimate the total incremental county-wide cost of users playing Pokémon GO while driving, including the value of the two incremental human lives lost, to be in the range of $5.2 million to $25.5 million over only the 148 days following the introduction of the game. Extrapolation of these estimates to nation-wide levels yields a total ranging from $2 to $7.3 billion for the same period.
"Death by Pokémon GO" study


Hardly surprising.
Think about your safety while hunting for Pokémon.
 
What a study

Being distracted whilst driving causes problems

While the phenomenon itself isn't surprising, such studies are necessary to be able to get a practical idea of the consequences, rather than just guessing. "26.5% increase" is more relevant information than "must be getting worse".
Also from time to time it can contradict what common sense would make you believe, even if it's not the case there.
 
Not surprising. I was guilty of playing it while I drove real slow around our neighborhood. Quick glances at phone, but nothing to the point where I’d be swerving or hitting anything.

Also once they took out hitting up Pokestops going faster than a determined speed (think it’s 20 mph) I curbed my phone usage while driving. Now I’ve uninstalled it and just listen to smooth jazz on my car rides.

Edit: Nahanago probably saw my ass driving around.
 
Not surprising. I was guilty of playing it while I drove real slow around our neighborhood. Quick glances at phone, but nothing to the point where I'd be swerving or hitting anything.

Wow, the fact that you somehow try to justify your behavior as being OK is the scariest part.
 
lol, humans.

-> research shows that distraction during deadly serious activities can be... deadly!

-> yo man I just glance at it, no biggie.

What next? Talking and driving is bad too? PLEASE! When I was a kid seatbelts were for luggage and you could drive with a beer in your hands! Soft modern life is the worst.
 
Wow, the fact that you somehow try to justify your behavior as being OK is the scariest part.

They never tried justifying their behaviour, they were just admitting to doing it...

On topic, yeah, it's kind of a no brainer. "Distracted driving leads to death/accidents"

A similar study would be into how much the ground gets wet after liquid falls onto it.
 
They never tried justifying their behaviour, they were just admitting to doing it...

Uhhhh....

"Quick glances at phone, but nothing to the point where I'd be swerving or hitting anything."

That's clear as day. If he said "Quick glances at phone, which I understand is still not OK and I regret it" then that would be an admission. But no, he claims that quick glances at his phone wouldn't result in him swerving or hitting anything, trying to justify his incredibly dangerous driving.
 
Uhhhh....

"Quick glances at phone, but nothing to the point where I’d be swerving or hitting anything."

That's clear as day. If he said "Quick glances at phone, which I understand is still not OK and I regret it" then that would be an admission. But no, he claims that quick glances at his phone wouldn't result in him swerving or hitting anything, trying to justify his incredibly dangerous driving.

I think you’re reading too much into it. I wasn’t trying to claim anything. Just that I’m guilty of doing it and you’re right, it doesn’t make it right which is why I’ve stopped doing it. Carry on good people.
 
Top Bottom