• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Ann Coulter: "We Just Want Jews To Be Perfected" (By Becoming Christians)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think I saw this in another thread...but yes, it still makes me wonder if she actually believes the things she says or if someone is just telling her to say controversial crap.
 
Curious. I don't know the background on her other then her being bat shit insane. But how did she end up in the position to speak on tv, churches, etc?

The bitch is nuts. She needs anal. DP, TP, etc.
 
I don't think that these particular comments are anything to get riled up about; christians, like many other religions, believe their way is THE way and things would be better if people come to Christ. Nothing hateful there.

Certainly nowhere near as awful as the "fag" comments she made about Edwards recently.
 
Stinkles said:
YOU GUYS ARE JUST TAKING HER OUT OF CONTEXT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!


etc.
She beat you to your own post
In her defense, Coulter apologized for the remarks and said they were misinterpreted.

"I don't think you should take it that way (as offensive), but that is what Christians consider themselves: perfected Jews. We believe the Old Testament," she said.
I'm sorry but in no way do I consider myself a 'perfected Jew'...I consider myself a Gentile given a chance at salvation

edit: I also like how she apologized, and then restated the exact same comment, essentially, only this time with a qualifier that it's not *just* her opinion but others' as well (despite me falling into that group and disagreeing with her)
 
I've posted this in a few threads including the official Ann Coulter one. The amazing thing is she said about 3 or 4 things I found equally offensive in the same interview. She was hot!
 
It's obvious that she does this on purpose. It's crazy that everytime she does this, her bank account increases.

How does she get away with this, but Britney Spears can't?
 
Stoney Mason said:
I've posted this in a few threads including the official Ann Coulter one. The amazing thing is she said about 3 or 4 things I found equally offensive in the same interview. She was hot!


What else did she say that was offensive?
 
mckmas8808 said:
What else did she say that was offensive?

I found the Jews comment offensive.


The Christian nation bit annoying.

The mixed couples have a chip on their shoulder bit.

Off the top of my head. I would have to dig up the transcript again.
 
mckmas8808 said:
What else did she say that was offensive?


she said Christians were tolerant of racial diversity

she's not the first to word it like that, but it always irritates me... the idea that christians (or any group) are doing a good deed by "tolerating" diversity.
 
"I don't think you should take it that way (as offensive), but that is what Christians consider themselves: perfected Jews. We believe the Old Testament," she said.

I thought that the old testament was the wrong one and the new testament was now the right one.
 
mckmas8808 said:
What else did she say that was offensive?

Not in this interview, but she doesn't think women should have the right to vote. She says that, if you look at voting records, if only men voted than a Republican President would always be in office. It is the stupid woman who puts Democrats in. Yes, she's a woman and yes she's very stupid.
 
catfish said:
I thought that the old testament was the wrong one and the new testament was now the right one.
Congratulations, your level in Christian Theology has now advanced to level NeoGAF™
 
Gigglepoo said:
Not in this interview, but she doesn't think women should have the right to vote. She says that, if you look at voting records, if only men voted than a Republican President would always be in office. It is the stupid woman who puts Democrats in. Yes, she's a woman and yes she's very stupid.

debateable!
 
ProofChristiansSuck.jpg
?
 
catfish said:
I thought that the old testament was the wrong one and the new testament was now the right one.


Both of them are right.


Gigglepoo said:
Not in this interview, but she doesn't think women should have the right to vote. She says that, if you look at voting records, if only men voted than a Republican President would always be in office

She had to be joking.
 
If John the Baptist (a Jew) was alive today and baptizing Jews like he did; people would get up in arms and call him an anti-semite (despite being Jewish himself).

Matthew 3:1-12:
1 In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea, 2 and saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!” 3 For this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah, saying:

“ The voice of one crying in the wilderness:

‘ Prepare the way of the LORD;
Make His paths straight.’”[a]

4 Now John himself was clothed in camelÂ’s hair, with a leather belt around his waist; and his food was locusts and wild honey. 5 Then Jerusalem, all Judea, and all the region around the Jordan went out to him 6 and were baptized by him in the Jordan, confessing their sins.
7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance, 9 and do not think to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones. 10 And even now the ax is laid to the root of the trees. Therefore every tree which does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. 12 His winnowing fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather His wheat into the barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”


Hell, the Jewish power of that day got pissed off at him for doing so...

John 1:19-28:
19 Now this is the testimony of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, “Who are you?”
20 He confessed, and did not deny, but confessed, “I am not the Christ.”
21 And they asked him, “What then? Are you Elijah?”
He said, “I am not.”
“Are you the Prophet?”
And he answered, “No.”
22 Then they said to him, “Who are you, that we may give an answer to those who sent us? What do you say about yourself?”
23 He said: “I am


‘ The voice of one crying in the wilderness:

“ Make straight the way of the LORD,”’[g]

as the prophet Isaiah said.”
24 Now those who were sent were from the Pharisees. 25 And they asked him, saying, “Why then do you baptize if you are not the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?”
26 John answered them, saying, “I baptize with water, but there stands One among you whom you do not know. 27 It is He who, coming after me, is preferred before me, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose.”
28 These things were done in Bethabara[h] beyond the Jordan, where John was baptizing.
 
ManaByte said:
If John the Baptist (a Jew) was alive today and baptizing Jews like he did; people would get up in arms and call him an anti-semite (despite being Jewish himself).

Matthew 3:1-12:


Hell, the Jewish power of that day got pissed off at him for doing so...

John 1:19-28:


what are you a member of Jews for Jesus or something?
 
I think Ann is the perfect purveyor of the Christian faith. She embodies so many of its philosophies and capacity for rational thought.
 
mckmas8808 said:
She had to be joking.

Wikipedia entry:

Taking away women's right to vote

TIME Magazine's John Cloud observes that Coulter "likes to shock reporters by wondering aloud whether America might be better off if women lost the right to vote."[2] For example, in a May 2003 interview with The Guardian, Coulter said.[3]

"...It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted.

Wikinews has related news:
Ann Coulter: Take away women's votes because "women are voting so stupidly"

Again, in an October 2007 interview with the New York Observer, Coulter said:[115]

"If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.

"It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'"
 
ManaByte said:
If John the Baptist (a Jew) was alive today and baptizing Jews like he did; people would get up in arms and call him an anti-semite (despite being Jewish himself).

Matthew 3:1-12:


Hell, the Jewish power of that day got pissed off at him for doing so...

John 1:19-28:

I don't get it.
 
mckmas8808 said:
She had to be joking.

The problem with her is she plays both sides. She wants to be a comedian and get immunity from her more crazy statements but then she also asks to be taken seriously (or is presented in such a light). I always say I have no problem giving her the comedian pass but then don't constantly bring her in on these shows to represent a voice of authority on sometimes very serious issues.
 
mckmas8808 said:
I don't get it.

Judging from this week's other Christianity bash fest in that other thread, it doesn't surprise me really.

John was a Jew. He was baptizing Jews in the Jordan using baptizing as a preparation for the Kingdom of God. The Pharisees obviously didn't like this as baptizing was normally only connected with Messias, Elias, and the prophet spoken of in Deuteronomy (which is why they asked him if he was the Christ, Elijah, or the Prophet).

I'm obviously not trying to equate Coulter with Join the Baptist, but rather pointing out that if John the Baptist were alive today and baptizing Jews while preaching that one will come that can lead them to the Kingdom of God; the media and the "OMG! I AM OFFENDED" crowd would descend upon him just like the Pharisees and Levites did when he was baptizing at the Jordan.
 
ManaByte said:
Judging from this week's other Christianity bash fest in that other thread, it doesn't surprise me really.

John was a Jew. He was baptizing Jews in the Jordan using baptizing as a preparation for the Kingdom of God. The Pharisees obviously didn't like this as baptizing was normally only connected with Messias, Elias, and the prophet spoken of in Deuteronomy (which is why they asked him if he was the Christ, Elijah, or the Prophet).

I'm obviously not trying to equate Coulter with Join the Baptist, but rather pointing out that if John the Baptist were alive today and baptizing Jews while preaching that one will come that can lead them to the Kingdom of God; the media and the "OMG! I AM OFFENDED" crowd would descend upon him just like the Pharisees and Levites did when he was baptizing at the Jordan.

If he were alive today, all you guys would be believing some other crazy story from even longer ago.
 
Wow. What the fuck is going around in her brain? I'm not gonna call her anti-semitic cause she didn't really say she didn't like jews or anything, she mainly wanted them to become christians through conversion I guess, since (according to her) it would be easier somehow. But it was all surreal, like a new level of retardness had been found all in all.
 
ItsInMyVeins said:
Wow. What the fuck is going around in her brain? I'm not gonna call her anti-semitic cause she didn't really say she didn't like jews or anything, she mainly wanted them to become christians through conversion I guess, since (according to her) it would be easier somehow. But it was all surreal, like a new level of retardness had been found all in all.


If I were Jewish, I would find little incentive to convert to what amounts to a distorted offshoot of Judaism, coopted by Israel's biggest (former) enemy: Rome.
 
ManaByte said:
Judging from this week's other Christianity bash fest in that other thread, it doesn't surprise me really.

John was a Jew. He was baptizing Jews in the Jordan using baptizing as a preparation for the Kingdom of God. The Pharisees obviously didn't like this as baptizing was normally only connected with Messias, Elias, and the prophet spoken of in Deuteronomy (which is why they asked him if he was the Christ, Elijah, or the Prophet).

I'm obviously not trying to equate Coulter with Join the Baptist, but rather pointing out that if John the Baptist were alive today and baptizing Jews while preaching that one will come that can lead them to the Kingdom of God; the media and the "OMG! I AM OFFENDED" crowd would descend upon him just like the Pharisees and Levites did when he was baptizing at the Jordan.


are you amazed or disappointed that things have changed in the last 2,000 years?
 
Instigator said:
If I were Jewish, I would find little incentive to convert to what amounts to a distorted offshoot of Judaism, coopted by Israel's biggest (former) enemy: Rome.


Honestly, this is an oversimplification of Christianity (as I learned it from Catholic schooling). The Christian dynamic to religion is so completely different from Judaism that calling it a "distorted offshoot" is as insulting as it is to Christians as Ann Horseface's comments are to Jews.
 
Propagandhim said:
Honestly, this is an oversimplification of Christianity (as I learned it from Catholic schooling). The Christian dynamic to religion is so completely different from Judaism that calling it a "distorted offshoot" is as insulting as it is to Christians as Ann Horseface's comments are to Jews.

Oh please.

You're being 'insulted' by one of your own.
 
ManaByte said:
Judging from this week's other Christianity bash fest in that other thread, it doesn't surprise me really.

John was a Jew. He was baptizing Jews in the Jordan using baptizing as a preparation for the Kingdom of God. The Pharisees obviously didn't like this as baptizing was normally only connected with Messias, Elias, and the prophet spoken of in Deuteronomy (which is why they asked him if he was the Christ, Elijah, or the Prophet).

I'm obviously not trying to equate Coulter with Join the Baptist, but rather pointing out that if John the Baptist were alive today and baptizing Jews while preaching that one will come that can lead them to the Kingdom of God; the media and the "OMG! I AM OFFENDED" crowd would descend upon him just like the Pharisees and Levites did when he was baptizing at the Jordan.

I hope you realize how stupid this comparison was.

Ann Coulter is the greatest troll of all time, I can't hate on her anymore. It's amazing how much power she has over people; her every comment makes people clench their teeth and curse the first amendment. I'm more than content to sit back and watch the madness. Is she crazy? Of course. Do I give a shit anymore, in 2007? Of course not
 
Count Dookkake said:
That is one of the problems of belonging to a large group.

Hey, I've never heard someone echo my own thoughts before on this matter. I am against defining yourself by any group. To simplify, if you are so close to some way of thinking (political, religious, environmental, etc.) that, when that group is insulted, (Conservatives are evil, Tree Huggers should die in a fire, etc) you personally feel insulted, you should take a deep breath and back away. When the individual morphs into a group, when individual thought is replaced by a group mentality, your identity ceases to exist. Oh, and wars start.
 
Count Dookkake said:
That is one of the problems of belonging to a large group.

Check out the No-True-Scotsman fallacy.

Nah, the guy shouldn't bother with notoriously anti-religious GAF if he's going to be that easily insulted.
 
Propagandhim said:
Honestly, this is an oversimplification of Christianity (as I learned it from Catholic schooling). The Christian dynamic to religion is so completely different from Judaism that calling it a "distorted offshoot" is as insulting as it is to Christians as Ann Horseface's comments are to Jews.

she's a moron if she actually believes Christians to be "perfected Jews" (she's actually a moron anyway). You're completely right. She should go look up some history on the development of Christianity - specifically where they determine really early on that they were not going to adopt Judaism (which is why there's no circumcism and Kosher laws in Christianity amongst others).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom