The "Worst Games of the Year" thread prompted me to create this one. Specifically, seeing that most people agreeing with me in LA Noire being complete garbage, despite it receiving the usual high marks for a big and hyped up release. I have another title in mind, an obvious one, that being MGS4. I imagine there will be spoilers for both.
Let's start with LA Noire and a sample from metacritic
really, proficiency in repeating the same exact fucking thing for 20 hours maybe.
Yes, this one is actually extremely poorly designed and thought out.
No, just no. The AV Club should stick to movie reviews. Actually, maybe they should skip those if they think LA Noire had anything resembling a well told story.
I guess the genre is still pretty fucking moribund.
Hello there Mr. Hyperbole. Replace Rockstar with any other name and this paragraph could easily be part of any other hyped the shit out release.
Now let's go on to the poster child for this kind of thing, MGS4. Everyone who has played MGS4 knows half(or more) of your playing time is spent watching long, drawn out cut-scenes(longer than any other game in the series before in the series, by quite a huge margin), that tell a story that is complete fucking trash. I'll give a quick example. There's a running gag throughout the entire series in the form of a character, called Johnny, who suffers from chronic diarrhea. That's all he does in MGS1, MGS2 and MGS3. Randomly shit his pants. That's all he does in MGS4 as well. Most of MGS4's ending is about this guy's wedding to Meryl, Snake's main love interest of the original MGS.
With that in mind, let's go right ahead.
There are no words.
No.
What if I actually hope to play video games? What then?
smh
Yes, let's just give it a 10/10, who cares?
Except, you know, 2/5ths of the game actually containing gameplay.
Maybe if you're an illiterate fuck.
No, I really don't.
You.
This is just from the little tidbits in metacritic, if I delved inside every full review I imagine I'd find worse than this. Much worse. Now, I'm not saying game reviewers get paid off or anything like that, no sirree bob, but how about some goddamn objectivity and a little less fear of ad revenue backlash from the publisher and/or console manufacturer, because for the life of me I cannot fucking explain some of the reactions to these two titles. I can understand getting caught in the hype, but these two have such huge failings all over the freaking place it's just ridiculous.
You got any other examples?
Let's start with LA Noire and a sample from metacritic
Giant Bomb said:L.A. Noire is a bold release, because it defies the expectations not just for the type of game Rockstar usually releases, but also for the type of game that receives this degree of care and proficiency in its execution. The world already has enough open-world action games, but a game which marries that open world to such a methodical style of gameplay, with a budget this big, is a rare thing indeed.
really, proficiency in repeating the same exact fucking thing for 20 hours maybe.
1UP said:This is vastly different from the countless first- and third-person shooters and all the "me too" open-world games sitting on store shelves. All the things I've only read about in Dashiell Hammett novels, or seen in film classics like Double Indemnity, have all come to interactive life in L.A. Noire.
Yes, this one is actually extremely poorly designed and thought out.
The AV Club said:If gaming's holy grail is a thousand stories, well told, L.A. Noire might be the first to come within spitting distance.
No, just no. The AV Club should stick to movie reviews. Actually, maybe they should skip those if they think LA Noire had anything resembling a well told story.
Gamepro said:It's a bold, cinematic step forward in a genre that's dying for innovation, and its implementation of the MotionScan technology is truly a game-changer.
I guess the genre is still pretty fucking moribund.
Team XBOX said:Truly this is the most mature game that Rockstar has been a part of. In the end it is something that will go down in history as one of the most innovative games of our time, and for good reason. You are simply supposed to have this game in your collection, if you consider yourself a gamer by any definition of the word.
Hello there Mr. Hyperbole. Replace Rockstar with any other name and this paragraph could easily be part of any other hyped the shit out release.
Now let's go on to the poster child for this kind of thing, MGS4. Everyone who has played MGS4 knows half(or more) of your playing time is spent watching long, drawn out cut-scenes(longer than any other game in the series before in the series, by quite a huge margin), that tell a story that is complete fucking trash. I'll give a quick example. There's a running gag throughout the entire series in the form of a character, called Johnny, who suffers from chronic diarrhea. That's all he does in MGS1, MGS2 and MGS3. Randomly shit his pants. That's all he does in MGS4 as well. Most of MGS4's ending is about this guy's wedding to Meryl, Snake's main love interest of the original MGS.
With that in mind, let's go right ahead.
TheSixthAxis said:To review such a game as Metal Gear Solid 4 is like commissioning a blind man to share his opinion on a beautiful oil painting painted by a true artist, it just wouldn't work.
There are no words.
IGN said:Is it possible to give a game an 11? If so, this would be the game that would merit that score. Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots is a title that exceeds all of the hype that was attached to the title.
No.
GameInformer said:As the crowning achievement of the series' 20-year history, Hideo Kojima's final Metal Gear Solid title may not be what you expect, but it is everything you could hope for in a video game.
What if I actually hope to play video games? What then?
PSX Xtreme said:There is no doubt about it, but this is easily the best experience you'll have on the PlayStation 3 to date, simply nothing comes close to MGS4's presentation, story-telling, gameplay, visuals, and sound.
smh
Kikizo said:It's stupid, it's nonsensical, it's over the top, it's full of awful dialogue, it demands long sittings and it hasn't changed much from the first game ten years ago. But then, it's Metal Gear Solid, so who cares?
Yes, let's just give it a 10/10, who cares?
G4TV said:While debate will no doubt rage over the story and its outcomes, there really isn't a single wrong move in the gameplay sections.
Except, you know, 2/5ths of the game actually containing gameplay.
Playstation: The Official Magazine said:If you come to the game with no prior MGS knowledge, you'll still uncover one of the most absorbing stories ever told.
Maybe if you're an illiterate fuck.
GamingAge said:Kojima wrapped everything up in a nice little bow and gave it to us as a parting gift. Your questions get answered, your heartstrings get pulled, your mind gets blown, and you finally get the closure you've spent the last two decades earning.
No, I really don't.
GamePlanet said:Metal Gear Solid 4 isn't just a game, it's a work of art.
You.
This is just from the little tidbits in metacritic, if I delved inside every full review I imagine I'd find worse than this. Much worse. Now, I'm not saying game reviewers get paid off or anything like that, no sirree bob, but how about some goddamn objectivity and a little less fear of ad revenue backlash from the publisher and/or console manufacturer, because for the life of me I cannot fucking explain some of the reactions to these two titles. I can understand getting caught in the hype, but these two have such huge failings all over the freaking place it's just ridiculous.
You got any other examples?