http://venturebeat.com/2013/05/10/t...-have-bought-ouya-and-other-might-have-beens/
There's a bit more than than in there, but some of the things he says are just... weird...
There's also this, from the one who wrote the article:
Nintendo should have bought Ouya? And who the hell still refers to any Nintendo console as "a Nintendo"?
There's a bit more than than in there, but some of the things he says are just... weird...
Gordon said in an interview this week, My own take on Nintendo is that the Wii was a spectacular head fake. But Microsofts Kinect and its Xbox Live service have staked out the high end of the game business. Sony, by comparison, is starting to look like the new Sega of the game business, Gordon said. That means that it may soon exit hardware, as Sega did with the ill-fated Dreamcast.
Once you have a tablet, there is not much reason to buy a Nintendo, Gordon said. What they have left is the Miyamoto exclusive box. If you want his games, then you spend the $300 on whatever Miyamoto makes. But thats a box for tens of millions, not hundreds of millions.
There's also this, from the one who wrote the article:
Were not sure what the valuation was, but Ouya just got a lot more expensive as a potential acquisition. Nintendo should have grabbed it while it had the chance. Nintendo, meanwhile, had its window to sell Wii U game consoles during the last six months. It had a shortage of hits, and the big games from top publishers either didnt materialize or didnt sell well. Nintendo generated some good digital revenue through the app store on the Wii U platform, but it hasnt had a huge breakout hit on that front.
Now the Wii U is dead in the water. Nintendo sold 3.45 million Wii U consoles as of March 31, and since December, Nintendo sold just 390,000 Wii Us. Thats a horrible start for a new game console, and it must be viewed in this context: Apple sold 56 million iPhones and iPads in one quarter.
Nintendo should have bought Ouya? And who the hell still refers to any Nintendo console as "a Nintendo"?