I'd rather have this.I said biiiiiiiiiitch.
Just reboot it already.
with star Lord
Or this...I'll only watch if there's more Shia.
...with this.Indeed.
And don't allow George out of his cage.
Crystal Skull is better than Temple of Doom,so why not?
OP updated with new (old) facts.
edit: seems to be an issue in the thread itself, so it should probably go in the OP - George Lucas sold Lucasfilm to Disney in 2013 for 4 billion dollars. He's been retired from filmmaking since.
That does not look like he's saying "Sonofabitch"
That looks like something else entirely.
Had you really not known about that?
Harrison Ford's "acting" method involves not opening his mouth when he talks.
You're right. Let's leave that stuff out of our beloved childhoo-Shia swinging like a monkey on a vine, from vine to vine, with other monkeys on their own respective vines, was perhaps the dumbest moment in movie history - then they made it even WORSE by adding the Tarzan yell.
Let's not get crazy now.
Temple of Doom is better than The Last Crusade
They'd still need to make a 4th movie though right? Right?
Yeah, I just rewatched it yesterday and love it. I never liked it before, but I think it's great now. Definitely the second best Indy film.seriously. temple of doom hate has gotten so bizarre to the point where people want to believe crystal skull is better, lmao.
I don't which is more unappealing. Another Indy movie with Ford or a reboot with a new actor.
Never noticed that the eyes are basically ping pong balls in this shot. Ruining it slightly.
although I don't know why a recast isn't in the cards, they can easily recast the son without people making a fuss
Because no one cares about that character.
Well, it be an odd numbered sequel so it should turn great.
Heh. When you watch the video, he says "you can't...(audience applause dies down) you sonofabitch."
The gif says "you sonofabitch" along the bottom, but it's looping "you can't" - which looks like "you cunt," which is why I was like "that doesn't look like what the caption says he's saying."
MYSTERY SOLVED!
they can make us care i think. chris pratt would work so much better as indy's son in indy 5 than taking the actual role of Dr. Jones (which I don't see him as a good fit for).
plus think of the chemistry between those two.
Sorry if I'm dashing your hopes but there's no way any of that is happening. When a movie series introduces a side character that people dislike, the next step is never to give them their own movie.
my hopes and dreams squashed with every minute i spend at neogaf.......
Passing the torch would be okay and I wouldn't mind seeing maybe a daughter take some of the torch alongside another male actor for some adventures. No Shia.
The way I can see it, this franchise can go a number of ways,
1) One last classic Indy adventure with Harrison Ford reprising the role of Indiana Jones. Along the way, Indy discovers the fabled fountain of youth...where at some point in the story, he is transformed into his younger self. who just so happens to look like Chris Pratt/Bradley Cooper/Nathan Lane. Thus the stage is set for more classic Indy adventures.
2) A new Indiana Jones series that follows Indy and Marian's son (not the Shia Labaff one). Named after his father, we get a young man who starts to follow in his father's footsteps, perhaps against a more modern backdrop...perhaps during the Cold War or something. I don't know. That could be a thing.
3) Fresh reboot with a new leading man (Chris Pratt/Bradley Cooper/Nathan Lane), no questions asked. Indiana Jones with a new face doing what Indiana Jones does best. Traveling the world in pursuit of sacred historical artifacts and shooting Nazi's.
4) Fresh reboot with a new leading man (Chris Pratt/Bradley Cooper/Nathan Lane), no questions asked. Only this time, the new series is set in modern times. Better hope no-one took a picture of you shooting that unarmed man on their smart-phone, Indy! It could trend! #IndianaJoneshasgonemodern
I said biiiiiiiiiitch.