Last Month: "I can't fucking wait for E3!! It's gonna be huuuuge!!!"
This Month: "E3 is irrelevant. Nobody watches that shit."
LOL.
Last Month: "I can't fucking wait for E3!! It's gonna be huuuuge!!!"
This Month: "E3 is irrelevant. Nobody watches that shit."
Last Month: "I can't fucking wait for E3!! It's gonna be huuuuge!!!"
This Month: "E3 is irrelevant. Nobody watches that shit."
This guy put it better:you mean like a Nintendo direct? Oh, that could work.
I can't see how this makes any sense because it doesn't,
but I'll go ahead and stop reading the thread, it's not very healthy.
Well you see, those aren't E3 attendance numbers. This graph is more indicative of Twitch's proliferation. I think E3 in the traditional sense, a physical location where people of the industry and gamers come together is becoming irrelevant. Showing your goods on the internet come early June is what people have come to expect. The E3 is just a banner, a tag for that.
There is no Direct, and it says in the text in the OP that it will be the only playable game at Nintendo's booth.
So if they have no other playable games and they're having no directs, where are these other game announcements supposed to come from?
Last Month: "I can't fucking wait for E3!! It's gonna be huuuuge!!!"
This Month: "E3 is irrelevant. Nobody watches that shit."
Well, looks like I might just skip E3 outright this year. I mean Zelda is nice but this sounds like a "spoil the whole damn game" event. I don't WANT a whole damn day of this game, give me a tease then shut up about it.
But what if Zelda is amazing?
E3 2015 had the highest attendance since 2007.Well you see, those aren't E3 attendance numbers. This graph is more indicative of Twitch's proliferation. I think E3 in the traditional sense, a physical location where people of the industry and gamers come together is becoming irrelevant. Showing your goods on the internet come early June is what people have come to expect. The E3 is just a banner, a tag for that.
No Nintendo standalone event at any other time during the year will have the audience size of an event hosted during E3 week.It's about presentation and what you show. This can be done at a Nintendo standalone event.
I have a very hard time believing Nintendo has NOTHING to show for their new console a mere 8 months before launch.
In fact, it leads me to believe NX won't even launch in March 2017, and will probably end up being pushed to Holiday 2017.
No Nintendo standalone event at any other time during the year will have the audience size of an event hosted during E3 week.
Why do you keep making up narratives?Yeah how quickly the narrative changes. I wonder how many of the people going "skipping E3 is their smartest move!!" were saying that at the beginning of thid year.
And let's get real, those same people would've said "being at E3 is their smartest move!" Had they had a huge NX info blowout instead.
Please point out specific cases of this phenomenon.
No Nintendo standalone event at any other time during the year will have the audience size of an event hosted during E3 week.
Oh they almost assuredly have stuff to show. My guess is they don't have what they consider ENOUGH. They don't want to repeat Wii U, where they had nintendoland, game and wario, and NSMBU. It wasn't until september that they could show bayo 2, monster hunter, and a couple more.
Sony and MS were able to show off their consoles at E3 and announce prices and show games and still commanded lots of media coverage. I don't see why Nintendo couldn't do the same with a blowout at E3.
And there's been no confirmation of a "fall event" at this point, only that it'd be discussed later in the year.
What I am saying is that this conclusion doesn't make sense. They're not going to pivot to such a major degree as to be unable to show or reveal the even most basic of information of the hardware.
Hence the "2018" statement.
There are extenuating circumstances to this decision, obviously, we just have no idea what they are but the idea I am putting forth is that this isn't related to a "lack of stuff to show".
It's obviously true.This seems like a pretty definitive statement to make, one that you cannot possibly prove beyond any measure nor can anyone really dispute because NO ONE FUCKING KNOWS IF THAT COULD BE TRUE.
I know there aren't too many but could you imagine a big Nintendo fan that doesn't care for Zelda???It isn't irrelevant, and I'm still excited. They're showing Zelda, by far my most anticipated game right now. However, people are making a bigger deal out of it than necessary.
Why do you keep making up narratives?
People are saying in this day and age information gets out there just as easily with a standalone reveal event just like Sony did with the PS4 and MS did with the X1. Who's saying skipping E3 is the smartest move?
No Nintendo standalone event at any other time during the year will have the audience size of an event hosted during E3 week.
Both Sony and MS still had a big presence that E3, what are you even talking about?
What I am saying is that this conclusion doesn't make sense.
Nintendo doesn't present information on hardware. They show the hardware (sometimes) and the games. So they need to have the hardware in a presentable form (at least the controller) and in an almost final config for the reveal. It's not that difficult to understand really.
And nothing makes less sense than showing at E3 their NX flagship title running on their dead console
I know there aren't too many but could you imagine a big Nintendo fan that doesn't care for Zelda???
This E3 will be a nightmare, hope they have other consoles and maybe Zelda will win them over.
lolLast Month: "I can't fucking wait for E3!! It's gonna be huuuuge!!!"
This Month: "E3 is irrelevant. Nobody watches that shit."
Last Month: "I can't fucking wait for E3!! It's gonna be huuuuge!!!"
This Month: "E3 is irrelevant. Nobody watches that shit."
It's obviously true.
And nothing makes less sense than showing at E3 their NX flagship title running on their dead console
I don't get how else to explain that Zelda is more than its combat, which Souls isn't. MM's status as arguably the goat Zelda rests on its script, quests, and characters, not its combat. Even TP/SS's use of motion was better on the noncombat side. Saying Zelda is like Souls, completely misses the other 3/4ths of the game. And iron knuckle fights are indeed rare per game, its why you crave the next fight.And if you think that the Iron Knuckle fight is a rare instance of combat in 3D Zelda games, then I wonder if you've even played any of them.
Idk why you quoted me because you literally didn't address what I said at all. But yes, the way Sony presented at E3 directly influenced the public's perception of the two consoles. Sony went right for the jugular and mocked Microsoft for their DRM strategy, price point and software catalogue. PS4 has had immense success ever since.And that still doesn't mean anything. How did it benefit the PS4 over X1? MS presented a system with a higher price and they had the whole drm debacle.
E3 didn't fix who was going to "win". The companies had a presentation just like they had their standalone reveal events. At Sonys people were happy and excited. At MS's it was mostly the opposite. Either way the news gets spread around with the age we're in.
E3 is not irrelevant, but stop acting like E3 is the end all of information.
So, you're opinion is that NX will be 100% focused on Blue Ocean and bringing back the Wii audience? Well, that'll last at least two months before before being dropped and going 100% mobile.
It increased their exposure. Doing an event after e3 ? Not so much.I mean it did come between their reveal event and launch so...why didn't they reveal their systems at E3?
I literally can because it's literally common sense.Alright, then point to me the numbers of this year's E3 versus the event Nintendo hasn't announced they're hosting yet.
Oh wait! You can't! Because it hasn't happened yet! And part of that statement relies on a scenario which isn't happening thus we would never have any actual numbers to compare! Which means you literally cannot make the statement that E3 is guaranteed to be a bigger audience!
I don't get how else to explain that Zelda is more than its combat, which Souls isn't. MM's status as arguably the goat Zelda rests on its script, quests, and characters, not its combat. Even TP/SS's use of motion was better on the noncombat side. Saying Zelda is like Souls, completely misses the other 3/4ths of the game. And iron knuckle fights are indeed rare per game, its why you crave the next fight.
Again, that should be locked in-stone for months if not over a year. Only way this works is if, and this is going batshit, that AMD/GloFo manufacturing rumor is true, those units were for E3, and Nintendo physically has no on-hand presentable hardware.
This is obviously a thrown-together-at-the-last-minute decision. Of course it doesn't make sense. Its a desperate move by NoA to have *something* to do with the show floor.