so if they show an unfinished console with unifinished games they would be "competent"? how exactly? people already ripped a new one for E3 2012 and E32015, Nintendo knows that the next time they show something, it needs to blow the viewers minds
Where I said that?
Isn't pretty evident that YOU are saying the same as me?
They are incoompetent.
a VIDEOGAME company that for whatever reasons (they said NO GAMES, officially, we probably can smell also something hw-related) isn't able to
- propose games for their on-the-market hw (the Wii U, with just Paper mario coming out for the entire second half of 16 and Q1 17)
- sustain their other on-the-market hw (which first party games will be released in 2016 for the 3DS?)
- cover the few products incoming (3ds games, paper mario) during the year with proper mktg campaing (icnluding e3)
- announce the new hw
- release the new hw
how would you call them?
I firmly believe that they didn't plan such a weak 2016 (April 16/March 17) neither in terms of PR nor contents, but...this doesnt make them "evil", but incompetent.
To better clarify: I'm not saying that they should have presented an incomplete console/lineup. But the fact that to avoid that they are forced to erase themselves from the "videogame world" (not only related to the E3 Digital event or whatever, but in general, considering how they DIDN'T ANNOUNCE any Direct, any Event, any Game, any...nothing up to now), shows us how incompetent they are in this very moment of their history.