• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kimishima: "NX is neither the successor to the Wii U nor to the 3DS."

Ugh I'm so excited for NX.

March 2017 right? I'll probably line up on Nintendo World and meet all the Nintendrones. It will be an eventful day.

A bless.
 

Z3M0G

Member
NX is successor the same way Wii was successor to the GameCube. History is even repeating itself with Zelda.
 
There's no way they continue to make games for Wii U after NX comes out. I think what he's trying to say is that this is not the evolution of the Wii/Wii U business but a revolution to their hardware business and strategy.

He's just articulating it poorly.
 

KingBroly

Banned
There's no way they continue to make games for Wii U after NX comes out. I think what he's trying to say is that this is not the evolution of the Wii/Wii U business but a revolution to their hardware business and strategy.

He's just articulating it poorly.

No, he's articulating it exactly how they did with the DS.

It was bullshit then, and it's bullshit now.
 

Russ T

Banned
Hardly anyone here wants to even consider something new. The Iwata quote about it not being condensed into one form but allowing for more than the current two forms keeps getting dragged out, but the same people who repeatedly trot that out just brush off the idea the idea of debuting with a third form, or the idea of a third form in general.

Not that I disagree with you - at all, really! - but... what would it even be? I just can't think of anything that would make it different enough. If it's something that can support a port of Zelda Wii U, then it's going to be similar enough to the Wii U in terms of how games are played. Which means it's going to support console-style games.

It's hard to actually be different from something you're so heavily imitating.

At best, I think we can safely expect some sort of weird hybrid thing with the supplemental computing device patent supporting its "transformation" from a handheld into a console. Which is great, I'm in full support of that idea. But that's not "third form" material... Unless "third form" means "first form plus second form equals third form".

So, what is your idea for what it could be?
 
There's no way they continue to make games for Wii U after NX comes out. I think what he's trying to say is that this is not the evolution of the Wii/Wii U business but a revolution to their hardware business and strategy.

He's just articulating it poorly.
Pretty much, Wii U is dead the second NX lands on shelves. 3DS could live on for a while, especially considering its having an "I can't hold all these games!" year.
 
No, he's articulating it exactly how they did with the DS.

It was bullshit then, and it's bullshit now.
See I agree with you but I think the situation is kind of different.

With the transition from GBA to DS they were potentially supplanting a very successful concept for something completely new, so they were trying to hedge their bets with the "third pillar" concept (i.e. Nonsense).

This time they are completely pulling away from the sinking ship that is the Wii branding.

Still I do agree that this is just posturing.
 
I guess it's a third pillar in the sense that one pillar is a bit shaky but still holding, and the second pillar is totally crumbling. I mean, the Wii U is forecasting 800k for the whole year. I don't think the GameCube ever did that badly. Pretty unlikely it and NX will coexist.
 
Call it a third pillar all you want, it doesn't change the fact that the 3DS and Wii U had a terrible 2015, which I think is fair to attribute that to shifting away from them.
 

ozfunghi

Member
He means it's the 4th and 5th pillar, next to WiiU, 3DS and GBA, which according to Nintendo, is still a current platform since it has never been replaced... amirite.
 
Not that I disagree with you - at all, really! - but... what would it even be? I just can't think of anything that would make it different enough. If it's something that can support a port of Zelda Wii U, then it's going to be similar enough to the Wii U in terms of how games are played. Which means it's going to support console-style games.

It's hard to actually be different from something you're so heavily imitating.

At best, I think we can safely expect some sort of weird hybrid thing with the supplemental computing device patent supporting its "transformation" from a handheld into a console. Which is great, I'm in full support of that idea. But that's not "third form" material... Unless "third form" means "first form plus second form equals third form".

So, what is your idea for what it could be?

I keep jumping around to different ideas, but I think they could be interested in offering a system that works on smart devices instead of just tvs. Take the bottom half of a shield portable and have it stream anywhere local, sell a snap on screen which on its own doubles as a cheap tablet in cooperation with Amazon if not regular android. Home hub is another idea although I'm not keen on the idea of having to plug in your portable and then switch to another controller.
 
I'm honestly starting to get irritated at all the speculation and non-info surrounding this thing.

As much as I want to know what they are doing next, at this point I think my main feeling when they finally show it will just be relief that all these headlines that we constantly get are done.
 

maxcriden

Member
I think he means that the NX Platform won't be a simple follow-up to either system. Though the fact that he mentioned both does add fuel to the shared platform fire. But at the same time, Nintendo's Facebook post about the NX seemed pretty singular.

Also, wasn't this said during the financial briefing?

Which Facebook post was this? If it was written by PR I wouldn't necessarily take too much stick in it. They might've not had the foreknowledge about NX to intentionally indicate anything specific about the console one way or the other.
 

maxcriden

Member
There's no way they continue to make games for Wii U after NX comes out. I think what he's trying to say is that this is not the evolution of the Wii/Wii U business but a revolution to their hardware business and strategy.

He's just articulating it poorly.

No, he's articulating it exactly how they did with the DS.

It was bullshit then, and it's bullshit now.

I think cagey PR speak pre-release is just the way the (video) game (industry) is played. Hopefully they can be clearer about what this means once the platform is revealed.
 
He said it before but in slightly more ambiguous terms (although that could just be different translations), iirc.

I still think this is probably corporate speak to (falsely) reassure investors that existing businesses will still continue and to hype up the NX.

I think that at least the first form of the NX will end up looking remarkably like a traditional home console with an added feature/gimmick/whatever you want to call it.
 
Does this quote convey any meaningful message, or am I just being dense?

It is intended to mean that the NX is something new, not like either 3DS or Wii U. But as it is PR-speak then, no, it does not convey any meaningful message as it does not have any hard facts which are the only things you can rely on from PR. (And even then, they may be intentionally framed to imply a false narrative.)
 

Russ T

Banned
I keep jumping around to different ideas, but I think they could be interested in offering a system that works on smart devices instead of just tvs. Take the bottom half of a shield portable and have it stream anywhere local, sell a snap on screen which on its own doubles as a cheap tablet in cooperation with Amazon if not regular android. Home hub is another idea although I'm not keen on the idea of having to plug in your portable and then switch to another controller.

Haha, I sure hope you're wrong, 'cause that sounds so incredibly unappealing to me it might result in me not even getting it. :p

An important observation, though, is that none of the patents back up what you're proposing here. While patents obviously aren't everything, at this point if it were something as radical as that, they'd probably have filed at least one patent that would back it up.
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
They really want to distance themselves from the Wii brand don't they? Also rest in peace 3D screen.
 
Its marketing speak

NX is absolutely replacing Wiiu/3DS going forward. He just wantd to create distance fomr the old hardware any way he can
 

WillyFive

Member
"[It] will enable fun and movement not seen before. I expect it to become a third pillar, next to GameCube and Game Boy."

-Satoru Iwata, Gamasutra (January 07, 2004) on the Nintendo DS​
 
Haha, I sure hope you're wrong, 'cause that sounds so incredibly unappealing to me it might result in me not even getting it. :p

An important observation, though, is that none of the patents back up what you're proposing here. While patents obviously aren't everything, at this point if it were something as radical as that, they'd probably have filed at least one patent that would back it up.


Well there was a recently updated old 3ds patent that got additions for something that interacts with a stereoscopic tablet device, I thought that was pretty curious. There was also the infamous handheld with card slot and funny shaped screen that more resembled a controller than a classic portable form factor.
I don't think we can rely on patents to tell us anything about a specific product though.
 

Daft Punk

Banned
That's the thing though. What new way could Nintendo have people playing video games? Call me cynical, but having a portable that plays one game and then you come home and plug it in to continue playing that game isn't disruptive enough (IMO) to warrant some hotcake-like selling of the NX.
 

AniHawk

Member
"[It] will enable fun and movement not seen before. I expect it to become a third pillar, next to GameCube and Game Boy."

-Satoru Iwata, Gamasutra (January 07, 2004) on the Nintendo DS​

the ds is interesting. it was obviously a stopgap to make sure there was a new handheld to battle the psp early on. it was originally the 'game boy ds' but after a while, the 'game boy' part was dropped, probably to let the game boy brand live if the product was a failure. a followup to the game boy advance was also in the works at the time, probably meant for a release in 2006 or later, but after the success of the ds lite, all those plans were dropped and support for the ds intensified.

as for the nx, there's two reasons for this recurring statement from nintendo's presidents:

1. although it's obvious from their forecasts where they expect the 3ds and wii u to be in the market place, they don't want to hamper sales even more by outright explaining there will be a successor platform soon.

2. the nx is actually a hub of sorts, like the uwp, that allows nintendo to support multiple form factors. in this sense, the nx as 'one thing' really isn't going to succeed the wii u or the 3ds because neither platform was created in this way.
 
This must be the fourth or fifth time either Kimishima or Iwata have said this lol.

Yeah Iwata was first saying this just over a year ago, at the first quarterly investor meeting that followed the NX/DeNa announcement. I feel that Kimishima has elaborated slightly further though.
 
Top Bottom