• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

FCC Republicans vow to gut net neutrality rules “as soon as possible”

Status
Not open for further replies.
They've done it before, but this will probably have to be at a larger scale and more often this time around.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sopa-and-pipa-internet-blackout-aftermath-staggering-numbers/

Luckily, Twitter blacking out for a couple days would probably be enough to have Trump put the kibosh on it.

Yeh, before I think it was only one day though and I think you could bypass it?

Theyd have to go harder this time around. Get them alt right fuckers riled up they cant go troll on reddit or FB.
 

Mr Swine

Banned
Won't this kill or hurt most US based internet companies or sites if millions of Americans suddenly don't visit sites regularly anymore?
 
So does this mean you will start seeing Internet packages starting at $39.99 for example, but that doesn't include YouTube, Spotify, and reddit for example? And you can add those on for an extra $5 or whatever? Can anyone explain like I'm five what this means for the average consumer.

that's exactly it.
 
Figured as much.



I forgot about municipal internet. Maybe losing net neutrality will help fuel the popularity of the idea, especially if telecoms get bold in their fleecing of consumers.

Its going to have companies like google and facebook ramp up the deployment of their wireless hsia solutions like 5G wireless, from what I have read though that tech is very troublesome but it beats having data caps. Say good by to that ping though.
 

chubigans

y'all should be ashamed
Kind of strange how backward it'll be in the future when telling my kids about how good the internet used to be.
How is the internet in any way good now?

I mean are people really blind to the state of services in the US now? You already have

-hard data caps for a majority of markets (except for some special services like Netflix that ISPs throw in as a bundle package deal)
-very slow data speeds compared to the rest of the world
-crazy overage fees
-throttling of speed for users who use too much data
-substandard coverage for a majority of users

The internet is already really bad. This will probably make it worse, or maybe companies will axe data plans in favor of throttling specific sites...who knows.
 

jelly

Member
Won't this kill or hurt most US based internet companies or sites if millions of Americans suddenly don't visit sites regularly anymore?

It's only going to be high usage services that rack up the GBs. I would guess many already pay ISPs for a fast lane like Netflix.
 

Toros

Member
Your connection speed stays 5-10mbps. But if you want to view Netflix you'll have to pay to view in HD (essentially your connection speed when connecting to Netflix is throttled to 1mbps or worse, unless you pay up). This is on top of the Netflix subscription fee. Net Neutrality is currently keeping that from happening.

At least, that's how I understand it. It probably won't immediately affect you given you're Canadian, but if Netflix gets hit hard by this then they could go out of business if they can't adapt or fight this change.

So basically the whole thing is a sham. If it will not increase my connection speed to even their bundled sites, then it serves no good to any customer.

I guess the only good thing to come out of this will be a huge resurgence of yahoo geocities pages, if the infographic posted on the first page is anything to go by...
 
I don't think I'll ever not dislike trump voters at this rate, thanks a lot jerks.

I'll be curious to see how fast people change their tune when they realize their favorite porn sites could be at risk.

How is the internet in any way good now?

I mean are people really blind to the state of services in the US now? You already have

-hard data caps for a majority of markets (except for some special services like Netflix that ISPs throw in as a bundle package deal)
-very slow data speeds compared to the rest of the world
-crazy overage fees
-throttling of speed for users who use too much data
-substandard coverage for a majority of users

The internet is already really bad. This will probably make it worse, or maybe companies will axe data plans in favor of throttling specific sites...who knows.

Because while all of that's true it's still technically the best it's ever been. Now my kids will have the same benefits with a much bigger downside.
 

Somnid

Member
Won't this kill or hurt most US based internet companies or sites if millions of Americans suddenly don't visit sites regularly anymore?

No. This specifically hurts upstarts and small sites who can't spend a lot of money to compete. Any large website would be on the "free-tier." both because it works for the ISP's advertising and because they have money to ensure it.
 

avaya

Member
Won't this kill or hurt most US based internet companies or sites if millions of Americans suddenly don't visit sites regularly anymore?

No this will likely to entrench their position. Google, Amazon, Facebook can all afford to pay so they'll pay it.

However there is a battle to be had here - Telcos have to dare to try it and risk losing their subscribers to competitors who don't.

In wireless it should be OK since the competitive pressure never really goes away. In fixed line.....they are gonna try and they'll get away with it since Trump will be gutting the FCC anyway.
 
This is capitalism folks. People making money off other people's backs and all they did was rig the system. No work at all.

You want to access the world's encyclopedia, Wikipedia. $10/month. This is ISPs picking winners and losers. Or you can go to ComWarnerPedia for $1/month. All the same info they copied from Wikipedia. They want to profit off ingenuity for doing nothing but making monopolies.
 

Sulik2

Member
Just a reminder Wheeler could have stayed for close to another year to fight this, but took the cowards way out and is stepping down on the 20th.
 

Dirca

Member
For those of you complaining about your porn, no worries, your good ol' uncle Dirca has you covered. I'll be setting up tents all over the country.

VK7I3Ut.png
 

Ewo

Member
Net Neutrality is massively popular. If they think that they can just outright ignore the cries of millions against it and have there be no negative consequences against them, they're in for a rude awakening.

I'd bet that a lot of people still don't know what Net Neutrality is. How many people have you met that "just aren't good with computers" and refuse to learn? Then, put the Republican angle of it being more government regulation into the equation.

It's a real risk and there's good reason to be concerned about it.
 
Won't this kill or hurt most US based internet companies or sites if millions of Americans suddenly don't visit sites regularly anymore?

this is not about internet companies. This is about the huge internet/phone/cable companies consolidating their power and ensuring they make money off of the sharing of information. Cox, Time Warner, ATT, didn't realize the power of the internet until it was too late so they didn't capitalize on the profits that were available by simply controlling the stream of information. Getting rid of net neutrality is their way of making up for lost time and ensuring their relevancy well into the future.
 
I don't know, man.

America has long stood as the country that fights against reason at every turn.

We could talk about curing all illnesses to ever exist in the universe and this country would still find a way to Americanize it into its own unique form of cancer.

I just really can't see them going: "Here's this extremely anti-consumer new rules, please comment." and them getting millions of comments against them and them going "Haha screw you we're doing it anyway."

I mean, really consider the massive scale of the internet they're screwing with here. Do you really expect people to be quiet about this when they've stood against it before?

It won't be just republicans though. ISPs as well. If one tries to go super anti-consumer (They can't possibly think people will be okay with a nonsense chart like that), people denounce that particular ISP. Then another ISP goes: "Hey! A lot of people don't like what that ISP is doing! Let's not do that and have them use our service instead!" Then people praise that particular ISP, and everything goes back to normal.

It'll be Sony E3 2013 all over again.
 

Chojin

Member
Wonder if Google will play along if(when) Neutrality gets smashed. Its here in Atlanta and I'm on the list for my area when it becomes available.
 

Extollere

Sucks at poetry
Fuck republicans and fuck all the "liberals" that took a holier than thou attitude of all fucking elections.

fucked this country for decades to come.

Of all fucking elections people had to take a stand, they chose fucking this one.

Idiots.

3 million more people voted for Hillary. Blame the electoral college, Blame Hillary for ignoring the rust belt. Seems silly putting the blame solely on a tiny fraction of liberals, when liberals did in fact show up and vote.
 

Foffy

Banned
They've done it before, but this will probably have to be at a larger scale and more often this time around.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sopa-and-pipa-internet-blackout-aftermath-staggering-numbers/

Luckily, Twitter blacking out for a couple days would probably be enough to have Trump put the kibosh on it.

Wasn't there someone who wanted to equate certain types of protests as "economic terrorism?"

I'm quite sure if that idea became law, such protests would be seen as acts of terrorism...:(
 
Do people really think that ISPs are going to mass throttle everybody for like, every website? Like, all of them?

I'm pretty sure they're aware of the massive backlash that would occur should that happen.

What the FCC will do is that they're going to introduce new rules, then open them up for public comment, just like how this happened before. Then John Oliver or some other celebrity lets people know, then people mass-send comments to them.

Net Neutrality is massively popular. If they think that they can just outright ignore the cries of millions against it and have there be no negative consequences against them, they're in for a rude awakening.

The GOP really doesn't care what's popular or not. See: The fight against gay marriage

They're never punished for it because single issue abortion/racist voters let them have free reign to do whatever. So they do whatever.
 

sphagnum

Banned
I'd bet that a lot of people still don't know what Net Neutrality is. How many people have you met that "just aren't good with computers" and refuse to learn? Then, put the Republican angle of it being more government regulation into the equation.

It's a real risk and there's good reason to be concerned about it.

Tons of people have no clue and think net neutrality means government censorship or the Fairness Doctrine.
 
It would be amazing if Google, Wiki, Facebook, and Twitter blackout services to the US for 48 hours, explain why net neutrality is important, and list the name and numbers of state senators offices.
 

Maximus.

Member
So let's say in 4 years democrats win everything, I wonder if or how difficult it will be to change everything back to neutral.
 

Foffy

Banned
I just really can't see them going: "Here's this extremely anti-consumer new rules, please comment." and them getting millions of comments against them and them going "Haha screw you we're doing it anyway."

I mean, really consider the massive scale of the internet they're screwing with here. Do you really expect people to be quiet about this when they've stood against it before?

It won't be just republicans though. ISPs as well. If one tries to go super anti-consumer (They can't possibly think people will be okay with a nonsense chart like that), people denounce that particular ISP. Then another ISP goes: "Hey! A lot of people don't like what that ISP is doing! Let's not do that and have them use our service instead!" Then people praise that particular ISP, and everything goes back to normal.

It'll be Sony E3 2013 all over again.

If people have already normalized the health care system in America, I have a very hard time not seeing this change getting normalized too...
 

Beartruck

Member
It won't be just republicans though. ISPs as well. If one tries to go super anti-consumer (They can't possibly think people will be okay with a nonsense chart like that), people denounce that particular ISP. Then another ISP goes: "Hey! A lot of people don't like what that ISP is doing! Let's not do that and have them use our service instead!" Then people praise that particular ISP, and everything goes back to normal.

It'll be Sony E3 2013 all over again.
Yeah, most areas only have 1 isp. There is nothing you could do.
 

Blader

Member
I just really can't see them going: "Here's this extremely anti-consumer new rules, please comment." and them getting millions of comments against them and them going "Haha screw you we're doing it anyway."

I mean, really consider the massive scale of the internet they're screwing with here. Do you really expect people to be quiet about this when they've stood against it before?

It won't be just republicans though. ISPs as well. If one tries to go super anti-consumer (They can't possibly think people will be okay with a nonsense chart like that), people denounce that particular ISP. Then another ISP goes: "Hey! A lot of people don't like what that ISP is doing! Let's not do that and have them use our service instead!" Then people praise that particular ISP, and everything goes back to normal.

It'll be Sony E3 2013 all over again.

Most markets do not have more than one or two ISPs, though. There's so little competition in the industry that customers don't get a choice to 'vote with their dollars.' The choice is largely between either having internet or not having internet.
 

avaya

Member
I just really can't see them going: "Here's this extremely anti-consumer new rules, please comment." and them getting millions of comments against them and them going "Haha screw you we're doing it anyway."

I mean, really consider the massive scale of the internet they're screwing with here. Do you really expect people to be quiet about this when they've stood against it before?

It won't be just republicans though. ISPs as well. If one tries to go super anti-consumer (They can't possibly think people will be okay with a nonsense chart like that), people denounce that particular ISP. Then another ISP goes: "Hey! A lot of people don't like what that ISP is doing! Let's not do that and have them use our service instead!" Then people praise that particular ISP, and everything goes back to normal.

It'll be Sony E3 2013 all over again.

America's broadband infrastructure is a joke. Cable co's are a monopoly. The only hope was forcing ATT and Verizon to re-enter fixed line in a big way to compete (with fixed-mobile bundling).

There is a reason why average European broadband bills are c.$40-50 and American cable co ARPUs are >$150. There is no consumer choice.
 

Peccavi

Member
No this will likely to entrench their position. Google, Amazon, Facebook can all afford to pay so they'll pay it.

However there is a battle to be had here - Telcos have to dare to try it and risk losing their subscribers to competitors who don't.

In wireless it should be OK since the competitive pressure never really goes away. In fixed line.....they are gonna try and they'll get away with it since Trump will be gutting the FCC anyway.

What competitors? A huge amount of this country has only one option for internet providers.
 
If people have already normalized the health care system in America, I have a very hard time not seeing this change getting normalized too...

We're talking about people's access to online gaming, Netflix streaming, pornography access, etc.

This is stuff that people do every day for entertainment. Nobody'll take this lying down.
 
America's broadband infrastructure is a joke. Cable co's are a monopoly. The only hope was forcing ATT and Verizon to re-enter fixed line in a big way to compete (with fixed-mobile bundling).

There is a reason why average European broadband bills are c.$40-50 and American cable co ARPUs are >$150. There is no consumer choice.

The telco isps are complete morons. They are having their lunch eaten by the cable companies.

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Wall-Street-Thinks-Cable-Companies-Will-Rule-in-2017-138565

The combination of more industry-friendly regulators, less telco competition, and lower taxes means good news in 2017 for cable companies, notes Wall Street analyst Craig Moffett. We've already noted how cable providers are dominating broadband additions as many telcos all-but give up on upgrading their DSL networks to focus their attentions elsewhere (either enterprise service for the likes of Windstream, or media and content for companies like AT&T and Verizon). As a result, cable has added 99% of the net subscriber additions in the last few quarters.

and still they want to charge as much as the cable companies for subpar copper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom