I'm still surprised that Sony removed Optical Audio Out on the PS4 Slim, you would have to either buy a Pro or the OG model to get it.
Just doesn't seem like that big of a deal for them, even though a lot of peripherals designed for the system require it.
By a lot, you mean enthusiast headphones?
Most tvs have optical outs still so
That makes your A/V receiver anywhere from 12 to 18 years old, by my reckoning. Is it a super expensive, high quality receiver you're not keen to upgrade on? Newer ones have a lot of other features besides HDMI inputs that are really worthwhile.
Audiophiles are so cute when they're angry
This thread feels like people are desperate to find things to complain about the Switch
Yes I think the OP is allowed to ask about optical audio out in 2017 because the same Home Console is using game cards.
cutting edge and superior standards are funny comments because PS4 Pro support it.
...and it doesnt matter.
An optical port on a tablet sounds amazingly ridiculous
So unless your receivers are HDMI 2.0a or 2.1 compliant and HDCP 2.2 compliant your receivers are about to be outdated too.
I am not going to buy an HDMI receiver at this point in time only be outdated in a year, right now is really not a good time to upgrade for us people with optical setups/non HDMI receivers.
So isn't that exactly why Nintendo doesn't/can't include an optical port?The real issue is that the switch doesn't support any Dolby Formats, just like the WiiU. LCPM 5.1 only. Which doesn't *fit* through an optical cable. And no downconverters exist. So if you have an optical setup, stereo is all you're going to get.
But you run this risk with most technology
To be honest, I'm kind of perpetually amazed that Nintendo's systems support surround sound in the first place. I mean, I'm not complaining, it just seems unlike them.
So isn't that exactly why Nintendo doesn't/can't include an optical port?
But you run this risk with most technology
Seems appropriate.So Nintendo expects us to spend $300 on a "console" that doesn't include a game (and pay extra to use it online), $70 or more on extra controllers, a few hundred for a new AV receiver, and we have to buy a new smartphone just for chatting, friending, and matchmaking?
If I have to get a third job just to pay for all this crap, it doesn't leave any time for playing the Switch. Or sleeping.
But to get the best experience, they really should support component out too, for crt tv's, because there's inherent lag in lcd's. To get the optimal experience for a genre of games no longer produced.
I've been wondering the same thing.My Vizio soundbar does not have HDMI, only optical. Will I be ok getting an HDMI splitter, and connecting the Switch to the TV via HDMI, while then using the splitter to run HDMI to optical for the soundbar? Apologies if this has already been answered earlier in the thread.
Audiophiles are so cute when they're angry
My Vizio soundbar does not have HDMI, only optical. Will I be ok getting an HDMI splitter, and connecting the Switch to the TV via HDMI, while then using the splitter to run HDMI to optical for the soundbar? Apologies if this has already been answered earlier in the thread.
Yes, this will work, BUT
... It will be stereo only. Optical doesn't have the necessary bandwidth to fit LCPM 5.1, which is all that the switch supports. Dolby Digital 5.1 is a compressed format that fits through optical, but Nintendo isn't supporting it, presumably to save money on licensing fees.
This is like removing the headphone jack all over again.
We love nintendo, so anyone who still uses it is old and wrong. K.
Where's my RF Adapter option, Nintendo!?
You guys are kidding right?
It wasn't on the Wii not on the Wii U. Why would you ever expect it to be supported now? Are you also expecting a Ethernet port?
When blu-rays came we knew that it was a standard. They didn't update the format or the cables every year.
This HDMI 2.1 thing is fucking dumb and should be illegal.
Seems appropriate.
It doesn't have an Ethernet port???
That is stupid if so.
I paid $300+ for this system (it still sells for that much) and it works great so I am not looking to replace it any time soon.
Actually this is completely wrong..Not only DID they update cables back then...They updated bluray "profiles" multiple times...which made your entire BD player obsolete...
It doesn't support digital coaxial, component or s-video either. Consoles have been doing audio over HDMI for over a decade and it's been clear which way things are going. Time to upgrade.
I dont really get the "its old!" posts. I mean, sure, its old, but both PS4 and Xbox One have it. I'm pretty sure that both Xbox Scorpio and PS5 will also have it.
My Vizio soundbar does not have HDMI, only optical. Will I be ok getting an HDMI splitter, and connecting the Switch to the TV via HDMI, while then using the splitter to run HDMI to optical for the soundbar? Apologies if this has already been answered earlier in the thread.
So can I tangent this thread to ask: as someone with consoles and pc in the living room (apartment so space is a concern), what's the move? My current speakers are just Logitech z5500, so they don't even support hdmi. Are there small footprint receivers I should look into? Time to ditch the speakers and upgrade? Sound card with hdmi out will be needed for the pc I guess?
I usually go all out on video, so I apologize for knowing nothing about audio.
You guys here pretend as if optical audio devices have been phased out. When high end (for gaming) headsets from Turtlebeach and Astro still use optical for even their latest 2016 models it means it's still the standard rather than an old technology that's phased out or is starting to be phased out.
Consoles have supported the superior HDMI audiontil dince PS3 but until these high end manufacturers of audio headsets switch to HDMI atleast for their flagship models, optical is still the standard.
I currently run my consoles via hdmi into the tv then use the optical out on the TV to the sound system. Am I doing it wrong?