More specifically, I think Maher was criticizing people who look to the past and then become self-righteous when they inevitably find something that's offensive by today's standards that was in a movie 30 years ago.
Not quite the same as people who get offended by things are douchebags. Just about everyone gets offended sometimes. It's mainly the people who act like subjectivity doesn't exist that are the problem, IMO.
Also woke people are just people who see things for how they really are instead of rationalizing with it. It's easy to say these people are annoying when you're not the target of constant injustice and discrimination like we black people are..
Isn't this the same guy who said "house nigger" on his show casually? Like, I get some people do get offended just to be, but he's part of the problem at the same time.
Also woke people are just people who see things for how they really are instead of rationalizing with it. It's easy to say these people are annoying when you're not the target of constant injustice and discrimination like we black people are..
There is a huge difference here. This time it is the younger generation not the old one.I like how OP doesn't understand the message. Every generation has done this. It's not millenials. Frankly, I'm not even sure 99% of millenials even think/know about this Apu controversy. Stop being an old man and talking shit about the newer generation.
More specifically, I think Maher was criticizing people who look to the past and then become self-righteous when they inevitably find something that's offensive by today's standards that was in a movie 30 years ago..
Modern day book burning.The trend I find most troubling is the one where there are groups and individuals whose desire seems to be to erase aspects of the past because they find them offensive on some level, or turn it into some pandering fictive version of today where it is presented like it was just multi-cultural dress up. There seems to be no comprehension that placing feelings over facts is not how history should be understood and it is important that we accept it for what it is warts and all, even if that might be uncomfortable for some people so we have some measure for how far we've come as a species and are robust enough to face new the new challenges ahead.
And why does it matter? It neither invalidates nor strengthens the point he's making.Isn't this the same guy who said "house nigger" on his show casually?
Well said and I have had similar thoughts. I feel like the "woke" thing is people just trying to pretend they are smarter than everybody else and makes them feel good. I really gotta read more on Socrates"I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing." - Socrates
What I find most worrying is the militant attitude of these people who think they have figured it all out. That is not the sign of wisdom, but of dogmatism. With great knowledge comes the awareness of how little you actually know about the complex things you study. The things that are easy to explain merely cover the basics, while true wisdom is gaining insight into the unsolved mysteries at the boundaries of human knowledge. It's the realization that things aren't as simple as you may have thought and how much there is yet to be discovered. That's why truly intelligent people are usually very modest about their proposals, because self-doubt about the thing you know is the first step to wisdom.
It is not wonder that the dumbest people are usually the loudest and social media only gives these people another megaphone to shout into.
'Wokeness' goes pretty much against these notions of wisdom of humility. In fact, I'd even consider it a very dangerous attitude, since it instills you with a false sense of certainty that makes it impossible to absorb new information. It is more like a dogmatic belief which filters your every perception of the world through its lens and makes you very antagonistic to arguments that challenge your preconceptions. It's the reason why 'woke' people feel so righteous in their hostility and anger, because they think that everybody who dares challenge their dogmatic truths must be twisted and evil.
Ironically enough, it's the 'woke' people who've brought pain and suffering upon others throughout the ages. Beginning with Socrates himself, who was silenced and shamed through the accusation of 'perverting the youth' with his mere questions. They gave him the choice, to be silenced by either going into exile or by being put to death. Socrates chose death over being silenced and we still remember his wisdom more than 2000 years later... those who accused him, not so much.
Even when confronted with death, Socrates never hated on his opponents, because that was the one thing that made him different. Humility goes a long way when it comes to educating people. I wish we would remember him for the wisdom he imparted on us, instead of just dismissing him as another 'white cis male'.
I find myself agreeing more and more with Bill Maher.
And why does it matter? It neither invalidates nor strengthens the point he's making.
As usual, Bill is a jerk. I'd like to know who these: "always offended' people are. The internet is a big place that allows people to post their thoughts freely, just like I'm doing. It's not that there's a generation of people looking to be offended all the time, but rather that the internet makes it easy for people to rant about being offended. That's it.
As usual, Bill is a jerk. I'd like to know who these: "always offended' people are. The internet is a big place that allows people to post their thoughts freely, just like I'm doing. It's not that there's a generation of people looking to be offended all the time, but rather that the internet makes it easy for people to rant about being offended. That's it.
Isn't this the same guy who said "house nigger" on his show casually? Like, I get some people do get offended just to be, but he's part of the problem at the same time.
Also woke people are just people who see things for how they really are instead of rationalizing with it. It's easy to say these people are annoying when you're not the target of constant injustice and discrimination like we black people are..
As usual, Bill is a jerk. I'd like to know who these: "always offended' people are. The internet is a big place that allows people to post their thoughts freely, just like I'm doing. It's not that there's a generation of people looking to be offended all the time, but rather that the internet makes it easy for people to rant about being offended. That's it.
Bill ragging on millenials is honestly one of the dumbest things he does. A baby boomer is not in a strong position if we're going to go down generational stereotypes.
It's the same old ass "the next generation is fucked" mentality as always, and I was so so glad the Parkland kids who were on his show a few ago cleaned his clocks on that topic.
Also woke people are just people who see things for how they really are instead of rationalizing with it.
More specifically, I think Maher was criticizing people who look to the past and then become self-righteous when they inevitably find something that's offensive by today's standards that was in a movie 30 years ago.
Not quite the same as people who get offended by things are douchebags. Just about everyone gets offended sometimes. It's mainly the people who act like subjectivity doesn't exist that are the problem, IMO.
It would entirely depend on context really. Words themselves mean nothing without the context in which they are spoken or written.
Some of his criticisms are valid, for example that it’s idiotic to go back and look for offensive things in media made decades ago.
But some of his other criticisms are stupid. It’s completely fine that apu was filled with stereotypes two decades ago when he was first created, but that doesn’t mean those stereotypes should be continued to this day.
The criticism of apu was that Indian kids are being harassed using the apu accent that the Simpsons propagates. And that’s a valid criticism.
The same applies to the Irish and the Mexican characters on the show. They may have been acceptable 25 years ago but the characters should be updated for the times.
Apu doesn’t need to have such a demeaning accent despite being in the US for so long. Many Indian people work at places like the Kwik e Mart when they are new to the country, then save up and open multiple kwik e marts. Many improve on their accent once they spend more time in the US.
Hell by far the most Indians that I see are doctors, not gas station owners, why not have an Indian doctor on the show?
Stereotypical characters were acceptable when the simpsons was made, but there is nothing wrong with people wanting the show to change with the times.
Some of his criticisms are valid, for example that it’s idiotic to go back and look for offensive things in media made decades ago.
But some of his other criticisms are stupid. It’s completely fine that apu was filled with stereotypes two decades ago when he was first created, but that doesn’t mean those stereotypes should be continued to this day.
The criticism of apu was that Indian kids are being harassed using the apu accent that the Simpsons propagates. And that’s a valid criticism.
The same applies to the Irish and the Mexican characters on the show. They may have been acceptable 25 years ago but the characters should be updated for the times.
Apu doesn’t need to have such a demeaning accent despite being in the US for so long. Many Indian people work at places like the Kwik e Mart when they are new to the country, then save up and open multiple kwik e marts. Many improve on their accent once they spend more time in the US.
Hell by far the most Indians that I see are doctors, not gas station owners, why not have an Indian doctor on the show?
Stereotypical characters were acceptable when the simpsons was made, but there is nothing wrong with people wanting the show to change with the times.
I agree.
It was actually the person who raised the issue with Apu who said he was being "mocked".The criticism of apu was that Indian kids are being harassed using the apu accent that the Simpsons propagates. And that’s a valid criticism.
I live in Germany for more than a decade, yet speak with one hell of an accent.Apu doesn’t need to have such a demeaning accent despite being in the US for so long.
The trend I find most troubling is the one where there are groups and individuals whose desire seems to be to erase aspects of the past because they find them offensive on some level, or turn it into some pandering fictive version of today where it is presented like it was just multi-cultural dress up. There seems to be no comprehension that placing feelings over facts is not how history should be understood and it is important that we accept it for what it is warts and all, even if that might be uncomfortable for some people so we have some measure for how far we've come as a species and are robust enough to face new the new challenges ahead.