Horizon Zero Dawn is a good game... but calling it the best action game you ever played is a bit of a stretch.
Join Aloy in the Forbidden West
One of the best I ever played too. Getting the sequel day 1.Horizon Zero Dawn is a good game... but calling it the best action game you ever played is a bit of a stretch.
Not trying to defend Craig but i also saw this in the Horizon gameplay today looks bad. Craig 2.0? BTW you can find this kind of thing in almost any game if you zoom in close enough lolI'm here still wondering how MS is going to compete with Sony 1st Party.. I mean...
Not following but I'll repeat and make it more clear.
Did not impress me because it looks good, JUST looks good.
I think the problem is this demonstration, felt too scripted and a script sequence of events. Not a creative and inventive way to show the new gameplay, plus all that talk and "smart" little responses in the mid of the gameplay, I'm not a fan of these new talky characters, and too end the loud annoying music.
It's good that these demonstrations shows us how the actually game looks and plays, but still, it's harder to light the hype flame inside you.
It legit looks brilliant. Gameplay with the first one was just great. It wouldve been nice if they could hit 60fps, but its still going to be great.
Only thing that concerns me is, the first one's writing and voice acting was only aight. It was solid. And even though this is a 10 min demo, they didnt really get you invested in the story or characters at all. Like I dunno some crazy drama, or a mission, or something.
If they can nail the story and writing it will make this so much better. I have my doubts on this front though. If it can approach what GoW or LOU do, in terms of the voice acting and story, that will be amazing.
I still can't get over how good this looks
Why do you get so hot and bothered about someone pointing at inconsistencies of the game's presentation? If you thinnk im warrioring report it to the mods. your blatant attempt at counter warrioring is hostile as fuck, you are not a mod.
Fucking hell you accusing me of hiding something? i havent played on an xbox since 2012 for fucks sake. Meanwhile youre targetting posters that raise points on some blemishes of the game.
Right now the only thing youre accomplishing is derailing the hype thread for this game.
Those particle effects look amazing.Shamelessly stolen from Theory but still looks amazing.
What were you watching this video for the muddy screengrab on, an OG Nokia Razr?Not trying to defend Craig but i also saw this in the Horizon gameplay today looks bad. Craig 2.0? BTW you can find this kind of thing in almost any game if you zoom in close enough lol
I mean that screenshot looks bad but still a lot better than then the Halo one. Even without the zoom in, Halo still looked awful in comparison to HZD. I'm sure they have done a massive overhaul since then. After all there was a reason why they all of a sudden delayed it. The backlash was pretty severe.Not trying to defend Craig but i also saw this in the Horizon gameplay today looks bad. Craig 2.0? BTW you can find this kind of thing in almost any game if you zoom in close enough lol
I still can't get over how good this looks
Yea shit like you had to wait 20 full minutes for a 4K video.I have no idea why Sony chooses to showcase that terrible 1080p YouTube compressed video. It destroys the experience.
"Bbbut it was CGI!"
What is the genesis of this cross gen mantra? We're currently in the 8th generation of consoles. That means this isn't the first launch period we've ever had. I've never heard so much moaning about games made for multiple platforms before.
This is totally normal, as the install base of the current gen dwarfs the next gen by over 12:1. I've never heard it used as some strike against a game until last year, when people used it to knock MS' strategy.
There's no reason a game has to be limited. What would HFW do better aesthetically if it was PS5 only? Seriously, does the argument have any backing or justification?
Is it the idea that there are no flying mounts? If that's the case, how did so many games on the PS4 and older manage flying? Did LODs become a thing of the past with this game? You can just shrink the draw distance, drop the LOD, and limit the travel speed to make it work. It's not like it's a multiplayer game where old console users must have the same experience. Perhaps there won't be flying mounts because it's a game design choice. It might break the intentional gating of certain maps that is the to force creativity and exploration, instead of letting you take the god's eye to a map.
This isn't a game that was ever going to have R&C's portal mechanics. It's going to use the SSD to stream more data into a frame, and that's totally possible now.
The level design on the demo is just your basic tutorial stuff, as already pointed out. The first game was open world with massive areas you could explore, and also smaller ones. It's not a hardware limitation, it's a game design choice. It's why we will always have linear games, because certain design choice require forcing the player along a path to encounter challenges in a desired order. The more open sandbox areas will still be there, but they're not exactly ideal for setting up encounters that showcase the desired mechanics. It's why tutorial levels are usually linear and scripted before releasing you into a more open part of the map. The PS4 didn't hold back Miles on the PS5, as Spiderman swings around a city, and gets into boys fights. There are basic game structures that will always exist, independent of the hardware.
Were you expecting an entirely different game?It's... got a grappling hook and a glider. And the melee looks slightly less terrible. Am I missing something?
What were you watching this video for the muddy screengrab on, an OG Nokia Razr?
I actually didn't think you were being a warrior, if you did you'd have know about it and I wouldn't have attempted to make a joke with you. Instead you took my reply completely the wrong way and for whatever reason you took it personally.
Plenty of people have brought up criticisms of the game that are perfectly valid. There is being critical and there is nitpicking.
If you want to talk about the machines not sinking in to the sand realistically because of their weight then you are nitpicking to a degree that would be impractical as it would have a negative impact on the playability and enjoyment in any section involving sand. That is literally what I was portraying in my first response to you.
And nope, as far as I can see the hype in this thread is still very much continuing even though you're continuing to have a cry.
I really got to fire up the first game for a comparison. Maybe it's just nostalgia playing tricks on me but I seriously don't think this looks much better than its predecessor.
Kind of like the last game but with with a high res texture pack....
Right now I'm pretty underwhelmed...
Nah it has much better lighting. That’s what stands out for me.I really got to fire up the first game for a comparison. Maybe it's just nostalgia playing tricks on me but I seriously don't think this looks much better than its predecessor.
Kind of like the last game but with with a high res texture pack....
Right now I'm pretty underwhelmed...
Now give me a flying mount.
It could be a late game feature or post game one.Completely defeats the point of having an open world if you can just cheat and fly everywhere. It would ruin the exploration aspect.
I'm pretty sure they just wanted to showcase the graphics in all their glory which had to be done in 30fps. I'd be very surprised if it didn't have a 60fps performance mode on PS5 with some sort of downgrade in presentation.I think the fact its cross gen, it looks great, but 30fps and cross gen?, hopefully its just because the video is 30fps.
Love the colour, and it def is a step up from the orig game, but not a generation better, and it was never going to be with it being cross gen.
Still if the finished PS5 version looks like this, and is 60fps, then you cant really get better for a cross gen game.
It could be a late game feature or post game one.
Man, c'mon. You can be a fanboy but horizon has NOTHING on botw's gameplay. That's why one still relevant and the other is ancient history.Anyone who enjoyed that is disqualified from having opinions on games IMO.
I was stunned when I played it, and not in a good way.
godd howard the ball is in your court now. show them what starfield with the creation engine can do!
A highly successful and praised game at that.Were you expecting an entirely different game?
Not sure why a sequel to a game would go on to completely reinvent itself into something completely different. The only series that kind of goes through that is Zelda.
Man, c'mon. You can be a fanboy but horizon has NOTHING on botw's gameplay. That's why one still relevant and the other is ancient history.
It is the best action game I have ever played. Imagine being arrogant enough to try to disagree with someone else's personal enjoyment of a game.
Sad how far some go.It's a special compressed 1st person version of the game with 10x zoom that's only available via Google Stadia.
The sad thing is the original Craig screenshot wasn't zoomed in and it wasn't compressed.
we are talking about gameplay in terms of development, horizon is simple ubisoft stuff, botw's physics are more complex than anything on horizon. boring or not, it's what it is.BOTW is boring to me but I accept that you enjoy it. See how easy that was? Crazily enough different people enjoy different things.
Really? Why did they bother to have Aloy leave prints on the sand then? Why did they bother to have the dinos interact with the shallow water over the beach uh? Because they thought "let's make the game less fun? Why did they bother to have the tall grass interact with Aloy?
Given the choices they made doing that, your argument that it would, somehow, make the game less "playable" to add those effects, doesn't hold
I recently revisited the original and this looks better. Give it a spin.
Man, c'mon. You can be a fanboy but horizon has NOTHING on botw's gameplay. That's why one still relevant and the other is ancient history.