All a unified SDK means is that the output can be configured to run on all platforms, not that it runs well or stable..... It may have additional testing suites integrated for exactly that purpose, but most of this stuff still cant be automated.
Right now they are designed around the PS4 deficiencies.
I think that Microsoft will be able to drop Xbox One quicker than Sony, since Series S exists. And most of these games will come to PC, which will be the lowest common denominator, after the PS4...
Which is strange as the majority with the concern about the Series S and with the Series X being held back by the Series S seem to be from the blue team
Surely MS will release less games for xb1 ...Mostly because they overall release less games, like look at 2 years of games since the series launch, they have release mostly cross gen games.
Just user lower res assets. Saves bandwidth and memory usage. I’m sure it’s not fun but I don’t see how this is any different than pc.
Like flicking a switch, amirite?
“Holding back until it was ready “
MS have already dropped Xbox One for all their upcoming games. So they only have to deal with PC minimal specs, which they can decide.
“Holding back until it was ready “
You spent hours in the other thread trying to pretend that 120fps support on s wasn’t planned for launch. And when you were provided links you bent yourself into a pretzel trying to come up with excuses.
He's been doing this since console has been released.Blaming developers ability when this has been raised as an issue since before the consoles launched is one of the most ignorant takes I’ve seen in this site in some time.
Xbox Series S RAM Not an Issue, But GPU Performance Presents Challenges for Future Titles - 4A Games
4A Games CTO Oleksandr Shyshkovtsov doesn't believe the Xbox Series S RAM is an issue, but the console's GPU performance could be challengingwww.google.com
This line sealed the deal for me that this dude is either a shill, or even worse, doing it for free.
You’re not allowed to talk about the system unless you own it by the way. You have to own all duh systumz
When 343 took 6 months to add 120fps support that still isn’t right, it was “great that they’re still supporting and adding features “
You mean the lowest denominator the XBO.
I actually had first parties in mind when answering.
“Holding back until it was ready “
You spent hours in the other thread trying to pretend that 120fps support on s wasn’t planned for launch. And when you were provided links you bent yourself into a pretzel trying to come up with excuses.
So the broken vrr support is irrelevant now? Vrrrrrooom
*up to
Almost any machine will if given enough time and resources. That’s the point from day one. That’s why they needed to bring coalition in to help with the matrix demo and it took 6 months to add beta features.
I didn't know that 6600 XT had 20% higher rasterization and pixel fill rate compared to 6700 XT and performed on par in games...
what u mean mate? ps5 performs exactly like how rx 6600xt performs on desktop. i'm drawing these comparisons based on raw performance numbers and how these GPUs and consoles actually perform in real world
Sony should answer the Series S with the PS5 Mini: 2 Teraflops, RDNA 1.5, 8GB of RAM, brilliantly designed to run everything at 720p for only $249.
No. It's a piece of crap, with a low amount of RAM running at a low frequency.
They are literally given about 14GB of RAM to use, on both consoles, and then they say, sorry, here's another crappy tape recorder that will only have 8 available, at the speed of a mammoth, and you have to put it as a foundation, because it shit can't be scaled just by lowering the resolution and the quality of the textures, damn it
The fact remains that some high-cailiber developers have expressed that developing for XSS can be challenging and the RAM has been problematic. When those tools get more widely utilized, the XSX will also benefit from any improvements and any challenges will still exist for the XSS. Developers will need to make compromises somewhere, and we've seen that already with drastically reduced frame rates, resolutions, and RT modes on XSS compared to XSX/PS5 for current gen and multiplat games. For example:People continue to post the same tweets from years ago to try and make a NEW claim about the XSS 'problems'. The fact remains that no dev at this point is using techniques the system offers to improve memory management. Also since we like to continue to bring up old commentary how about this:
Some devs complain some devs say there is no significant issues. Perhaps the issues just come down to a particular dev and some here are choosing to focus on the ones complaining over ones that don't have a problem. To pretend this is a industry wide problem is disingenuous. Again there is assistance if a developer wants it. If MS isn't helping that is a different problem.
Ask for a release date on any of them
Again in which metrics 6600XT is ahead of 6700XT like PS5 GPU is ahead compared to XSX GPU, be it pixel fill rate, rasterization, culling, cache speed/bandwidth etc?... Where were you when PS5 performed equal or better in substantial number of titles within 1.5-2 year? You are ignoring hard specs and real world data, your comparison doesn't make sense whatsoever.
Yes. Literally all developers lie.
How dare you say something that sounds so reasonable in such a place.
What's truly impressive is all the same usernames who called out Alex "bogaloo" are now suddenly firmly believing what he said.
What's truly impressive is all the same usernames who called out Alex "bogaloo" are now suddenly firmly believing what he said, without him naming any actual developers.
It's funny how you try to get Alex's opinion on some issues, and literally what they hear from the developers. But keep going
DirkMagusDCXIX @fanfiction.net Oops...
How quickly you changed rhetoric.But which developers said it's a pain though.
