• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

David Jaffe sets Twitter on fire after calling Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom “bland and old looking”

Jaffe is a borderline madman, which is why this was the only era he could thrive in the way that he has.

Touché to him.
 
Last edited:
Next gen Sony and Microsoft will release purposely underpowered hardware to lower expectations and therefore reaping 10/10s where scores were previously dinged for graphics.

Football Celebrate GIF
 

Represent.

Represent(ative) of bad opinions
And yeah.. He never called it bland.

He just said its kind of shocking it didn't get any points taken away for looking outdated.

As good as the game may be, it would be even better had Nintendo given these clearly talented devs real hardware to work with. We'll never know what a Zelda game not limited to sub-iPhone level hardware could be. Highly frustrating.

Even as a diehard Zelda fan you have to be curious of the what-if.
 

Bond007

Member
I think Nintendo gets a pass because they are doing this on their current hardware- which obviously isnt exactly new.
So, given that- it's actually impressive with what they have been able to accomplish.
 
I mean theres a screenshot circulating of Link standing on the exact same location as in BOTW and it's literally 0.01 changes after 5 years and game gets 10/10. Im not saying TOTK is a bad game but AAAAANY other franchise would be slammed for looking the same and having same locations 5 years later.

Far Cry games look absolutely different from each other but since the last 3 used the same mechanic of climbing towers for viewpoint, that was a negative. TOTK reuses so much stuff its not even funny.
 
Last edited:

ShaiKhulud1989

Gold Member
I kinda agree that some art choices in gamma/palette in general are debatable. Same with BOTW. In the end I'm playing TOTK on PC with reshade LUT because it's so much vibrant and fun to play with actual colours on my OLED.

Initially I've played BOTW on Wii U and my second run on CEMU was heck of a surprise, because LUTs made the game insanely more pretty. And I'm not talking about some acidic grading. Just saturation +30 and less yellowish-white haze all around.

(I own both a Switch and a catridge, don't beat me plz).
 

ungalo

Member
Next gen Sony and Microsoft will release purposely underpowered hardware to lower expectations and therefore reaping 10/10s where scores were previously dinged for graphics.

Football Celebrate GIF
It doesn't work like that. Maybe if they can make a game that can do what this game can do in terms of systemic events, level of interaction, sense of detail, seamless vertical connection from the highest sky island to the lowest point of the undergrounds, we'll see what scores they get. Because i don't know if this game deserves every bit of praise it gets but at least it seems way more impressive to me than anything Microsoft put out, especially when you can hold it in your hands.

All of this seems completely off topic to me. Except for the framerate and dynamic resolution that are technical flaws. The debates surrounding this game in particular shouldn't be about that in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Games like this feel like they were made for a platform like PS5/XSX and then later got a Switch version. While it's amazing the game can run at all on Switch, it's clearly not the ideal way to play with the lesser graphics, framerate and loading screens.

The problem here is, unlike something like Witcher 3, there is no "proper" version to play, so we have to make due with the Switch version.
 

Gp1

Member
The game looks bland and that's why we have day one emulation.

Keep it this way Nintendo.

Ps. He's not wrong though
 

AGRacing

Member
Jaffe needs attention.

He's also made jokes about black people just recently. We should stop posting his incendiary diatribes.
Man I'm having so much trouble deciding what "side of history" davidjaffe davidjaffe is on?! Is he "part of the problem" or "part of the solution"? Can you be both?

Can you link the jokes? Was he just repeating a Patrice O'Neal joke or was this original material? Was it a flattering joke about giant penises? I can't condemn a man based on your word alone, sir.
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
  1. It's Jaffe... no surprise here.
  2. He is not lying considering the visuals... then again, what did anyone expect? it's on the Switch.
  3. It's Jaffe, so one would think that being he is/was a developer he should be firmly away of what shoud be capable visually considering the hardware.
  4. Have I mentioned its Jaffe?
I honestly wouldn't be able to make a better looking game on the Switch hardware lol.

So that leaves the question. What can the developers do to make the game look better besides delaying it to the next console?

"depending on the console they're released on"

Well, yeah. I don't think it's realistic to expect a Switch to have PS5 or even PS4 visuals. BOTW already maxed out its capabilities back in 2016. Pokemon rightfully got shat on because the Switch proved it could do more. Xenoblade Chronicles 3 and BOTW is as good as the Switch can do.
Windwaker on GameCube and the hd version on the wii u looked better.
 
To be honest, I think if Nintendo had released the Switch only as a handheld that people would be a lot more forgiving of the system's technical shortcomings.

The problem for me is that I actually prefer to play my games on a large screen TV and this is where the Switch really suffers unless you are lucky enough to still be using a smaller 1080p LCD TV or even a CRT monitor. That said, even the 7" 720p OLED screen can only do so much to make the games look good when they are mostly sub-native and lack anti-aliasing and texture filtering.

Nintendo absolutely need to address this for the next Switch unless they go for a 1080p handheld unit only and abandon the hybrid console/handheld thing. I hope that they do a dock with additional upscaling and GPU hardware so that Switch 2 games can look good on handheld and TV screens.
 
Last edited:

FUBARx89

Member
I mean theres a screenshot circulating of Link standing on the exact same location as in BOTW and it's literally 0.01 changes after 5 years and game gets 10/10. Im not saying TOTK is a bad game but AAAAANY other franchise would be slammed for looking the same and having same locations 5 years later.

My brother, let me introduce you to the Yakuza series.
 
It doesn't work like that. Maybe if they can make a game that can do what this game can do in terms of systemic events, level of interaction, sense of detail, seamless vertical connection from the highest sky island to the lowest point of the undergrounds, we'll see what scores they get. Because i don't know if this game deserves every bit of praise it gets but at least it seems way more impressive to me than anything Microsoft put out, especially when you can hold it in your hands.

All of this seems completely off topic to me. Except for the framerate and dynamic resolution that are technical flaws. The debates surrounding this game in particular shouldn't be about that in my opinion.
That was a joke post...

Do you really think anyone with a half-functioning brain would think what I wrote!?
 
To all those saying "It's on the Switch", or "the hardware is shit"... that's complete horseshit and you know it!

I agree totally with SlimySnake SlimySnake , Windwaker on the WiiU with its fully cell-shaded graphics looks way better. They could have and should have gone with fully cell-shaded graphics.

The current visuals, together with BOTW, are horribly muddy and low quality. It's not a hardware limitation at all, but rather technical artistic choices that clearly don't work.
 

ungalo

Member
That was a joke post...

Do you really think anyone with a half-functioning brain would think what I wrote!?
I know your post was a joke but i wasn't sure if it was sarcastic or not. Because yes some people actually think that media will dismiss any criticism about technical aspects because of the hardware the game is released on and that in that sense (perhaps not only in that sense though) there is a "double standard" like some people on this thread said.
 
I feel like sometimes people forget that the Switch hardware has a very limited output when it comes to graphical fidelity. If this was an Xbox, PC or PlayStation title then absolutely it should be pulled up for looking like this, because they are capable of so much more in terms of graphical prowess.

The Switch just isn’t capable of that though, so why should the game be knocked for not pushing better graphics when it’s already taxing the switch as much it probably can?

Bottom line for me is if you’re doing as much as you can with the hardware, fine that’s kind of outside of your control. Could they have done more here? I don’t know but I feel like the game looks good enough in almost all cases in the limited time I’ve played it.
 

Rush2112

Banned
nintendo is immune to criticism because they are japanese. We all know it, he knows it. He juts cant say it.
 
  • Triggered
Reactions: GHG

ungalo

Member
To all those saying "It's on the Switch", or "the hardware is shit"... that's complete horseshit and you know it!

I agree totally with SlimySnake SlimySnake , Windwaker on the WiiU with its fully cell-shaded graphics looks way better. They could have and should have gone with fully cell-shaded graphics.

The current visuals, together with BOTW, are horribly muddy and low quality. It's not a hardware limitation at all, but rather technical artistic choices that clearly don't work.
I does work though. It worked with BoTW, everybody praised the artstyle at the time.

Wind Waker is small in comparison, not only in size but in the variety of atmosphere it can offer. You could not capture the subtelty of all the systemic and real time effects of BoTW/TotK with something as extreme as the cel shading of Wind Waker. It does look better for the eye but it's very one dimensional and rough.
 
I know your post was a joke but i wasn't sure if it was sarcastic or not. Because yes some people actually think that media will dismiss any criticism about technical aspects because of the hardware the game is released on and that in that sense (perhaps not only in that sense though) there is a "double standard" like some people on this thread said.
I'm firmly in the "indifferent" category someone brought up some posts above us. In my opinion, reviewers actually for once are doing it right when valuing mechanics, overall gameplay fun and art direction over sheer graphics. And I don't even own a Switch (yet). The Order 1886 wasn't a better game because the graphics were incredible.
 
Top Bottom