I'm kind of in the market for a new sandwich maker, this current one is getting a bit old."MS will announce a new sandwich maker at E3"
"Sony will debut a new line of pies"
"Nintendoccino? It's more likely than you think."
- The CES caterer
It will still be a console, so how is it bowing out exactly?If this has any sort of truth to it, I think it's probably an indication that the next thing that Microsoft puts out with the "Xbox" name on it will not really be focused on games.
assuming she's referring to sony, why in the world would sony spend tons of money launching and marketing vita and then sit out, of all things, the next-gen console race. yea right...
assuming she's referring to sony, why in the world would sony spend tons of money launching and marketing vita and then sit out, of all things, the next-gen console race. yea right...
because vita is the ps4
I don't really follow rumours but I'm pretty sure I saw a thread that the next XBox woudln't be a gaming focused device or something. Doesn't this sort of align with that rumour?
Nintendo doesn't exist, eh? Well damn.Sony can't bow out with them integrating so much still into their PS3.
But in afraid in the case they do. Microsoft's 720 coming out with no real next gen competitor is a scary thought. They can basically do what they want to do.
Sony can't bow out with them integrating so much still into their PS3.
But in afraid in the case they do. Microsoft's 720 coming out with no real next gen competitor is a scary thought. They can basically do what they want to do.
What does that have to do with winning money? MSFT has lost money during the Xbox 360 generation (mainly because of extended warranty and shitty hardware), and let's not even talk about the Xbox generation.
They wanted to win money with the 360, but they have expended more than they earned, bad business for them. I said I don't expect either to pull out, but I can see why MSFT would be less interested than Sony.
It's true that the Xbox helped MSFT to have a much better image (I remember those pre-Xbox days just too well), but that already happened, MSFT has the good will of people, Windows 7 is a good OS, as good as it gets, the Xboxs are functioning now, but what reason do they have to continue on a market that has costed them billions of dollars? A new console means bleeding money you don't know you'll gain... Unless you want them to basically make a new Wii...
LOL, just see how the SEGA first party teams are doing now. If you buy them, who'll buy them back? I'm sorry, but Sony has invested a lot of money, to me that means they will definitely continue making consoles.
Nintendo doesn't exist, eh? Well damn.
Nintendo doesn't exist, eh? Well damn.
Well they have a nice lane and I like their lane, so no biggieNot with what they have to offer currently, which they don't even really know what they're doing with yet.
Nintendo is in it's own lane with it's New Gen machines, remember?
[Nintex];34196310 said:Nintendo once again said they don't care what their competitors do. So you won't see Nintendo and Microsoft competing in the Killzone/Halo, Gran Turismo/Forza, Uncharted/Gears of War etc. way trying to 1-up each other every step of the way. With Nintendo the line-up for fall 2013 could be Steel Diver U and Wii U Music because they don't give a fuck.
Jesus, if MS are the only hardcore platform left if Sony leaves, I might just have to abandon console gaming.
I'm not paying 50 bucks a year to play fucking online which would go up knowing MS.
I don't quite get this argument, because those studios will still be working on games but on maby a multiplatform basis. It will be hugely profitable for Sony, because they are selling it on multiple platforms. People still seem to forget that the PS3 destroyed their PS1 and PS2 profit, two generations of profit gone. There having a hard time as a company as a whole too.Don't Sony have like 15 studios under their belt in the gaming sector? Isn't it unrealistic to assume they'll be bowing out?
Whereas you have MS, who dropped(?) studios/exclusive contracts (Bungie) the past year or so, and put some of their active studios like Rare on to Kinect centric stuff? It seems more realistic to assume that MS is going a more ambitious route and working on a Kinect focused general entertainment product (TV/PC divergence) and bowing out of the console race
Without Rare, there's no meaning left in the "Xbox" name. Let it die.
Jesus, if MS are the only hardcore platform left if Sony leaves, I might just have to abandon console gaming.
I'm not paying 50 bucks a year to play fucking online which would go up knowing MS.
Without Rare, there's no meaning left in the "Xbox" name. Let it die.
Jesus, if MS are the only hardcore platform left if Sony leaves, I might just have to abandon console gaming.
I'm not paying 50 bucks a year to play fucking online which would go up knowing MS.
I don't quite get this argument, because those studios will still be working on games but on maby a multiplatform basis. It will be hugely profitable for Sony, because they are selling it on multiple platforms. People still seem to forget that the PS3 destroyed their PS1 and PS2 profit, two generations of profit gone. I highly doubt they will bow out though.
This whole speculation doesn't hold much weight though, if there are clear signs and rumours that the next Xbox will be unveiled at E3, then that leaves them out of the equation. Why believe all other MS rumours and not this one? Just to fit this speculation's criteria? Why did MS then invest into new studios? Doesn't seem to hold much weight does it?
PS4 dead before it's even announced.
The it would not be "bowing out", it would be opening your console up to a new audience. The console will still be there, play games and offer other services. Sony will also be doing this.Because MS have always aimed to take control of the living room, and I think that the whole Metro/Windows 8/Kinect direction they've been going is a pretty big departure from the traditional console race, and realistically I don't think they're going to try and juggle both of them
Whereas Sony have been pretty predictable since the start, fully invested in a more traditional market and given their portfolio of franchises and developers this generation, nothing much has changed from that
I just think if one of them were to 'bow out', it would be MS because they are more ambitious to capture a larger market, taking a similar radical move Nintendo made with the Wii
Why do so many think Sony would be more likely to drop out of the hardware game, when their console/handheld business has been one of their most profitable divisions for years?
The it would not be "bowing out", it would be opening your console up to a new audience. The console will still be there, play games and offer other services. Sony will also be doing this.
All signs and rumours point to there being a dedicated console, so that will stay. So still not seeing the whole "bowing out" aspect.It would still be 'bowing out' of the console race, in a traditional sense
There would be no 'xbox #' console itself, just a service across various current devices
Yep, similar to what is in that article.
It just feels more likely MS would be taking this step first, considering their slant towards the Kinect/Metro in the past months
MS slips out.
Nokia slides back in...
All according to plan.
They worked on all 3 actually : DYeah, my fave Rare games are Halo, Forza and Fable.
This is basically my words, but more eloquently putSony and Microsoft both want the living room, but only Microsoft has a competent plan for it. They've got the lock on content distribution strategy and it's consistent across all their products (WP, Xbox and soon Windows). Sony's strategy doesn't seem to have any direction or cohesion. For the past six years, we've seen Microsoft evolve their machine into a total entertainment solution through software. Sony's platform has remained the same with a few new icons.
If anyone goes, it would be Sony. Either that or they debut a significantly different next-gen experience a la Nintendo. I don't think they have the constitution to outspend Microsoft in a console horse race. Even if they did, their business units don't work well enough together to make things consistent for the consumer. How do their tablets, phones and PS3 tie together? They don't.
Their finances are already under pressure. They might not exit the business, but they can't lose huge money on their consoles anymore.
Sony is more profitable with their TV's.
Building a TV with the PS3 tech AND having a cloud gaming service built in sounds reasonable
Gives a whole new meaning to the Playstation Network