• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Gaikai Streaming Service: Either Sony or Microsoft Will Bow out of the console race

pirata

Member
If this has any sort of truth to it, I think it's probably an indication that the next thing that Microsoft puts out with the "Xbox" name on it will not really be focused on games.
 
assuming she's referring to sony, why in the world would sony spend tons of money launching and marketing vita and then sit out, of all things, the next-gen console race. yea right...
 

TheOddOne

Member
"MS will announce a new sandwich maker at E3"
"Sony will debut a new line of pies"
"Nintendoccino? It's more likely than you think."

- The CES caterer
I'm kind of in the market for a new sandwich maker, this current one is getting a bit old.

New line of pies? With exclusive fillings? Sign me up.

Never was a big fan of cappuccino, still gonna see what it brings to the table.

If this has any sort of truth to it, I think it's probably an indication that the next thing that Microsoft puts out with the "Xbox" name on it will not really be focused on games.
It will still be a console, so how is it bowing out exactly?
 

[Nintex]

Member
assuming she's referring to sony, why in the world would sony spend tons of money launching and marketing vita and then sit out, of all things, the next-gen console race. yea right...

Stringer is still CEO, it would be the 'crown' on his work because he wants to make Sony a 'content company'.
 

-KRS-

Member
It can't be sony can it? Isn't it basically confirmed that third parties are working on PS4 titles already? I'm not sure about that but I seem to recall several such statements.

Do we know if third parties are working on the next Microsoft hardware yet?
 

frequency

Member
I don't really follow rumours but I'm pretty sure I saw a thread that the next XBox woudln't be a gaming focused device or something. Doesn't this sort of align with that rumour?
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
I don't really follow rumours but I'm pretty sure I saw a thread that the next XBox woudln't be a gaming focused device or something. Doesn't this sort of align with that rumour?

Kinect's lag was just MS's way to acclimatize users to the experience of streamed games...it all makes sense!
 

enzo_gt

tagged by Blackace
Sony can't bow out with them integrating so much still into their PS3.

But in afraid in the case they do. Microsoft's 720 coming out with no real next gen competitor is a scary thought. They can basically do what they want to do.
 

TheOddOne

Member
Sony can't bow out with them integrating so much still into their PS3.

But in afraid in the case they do. Microsoft's 720 coming out with no real next gen competitor is a scary thought. They can basically do what they want to do.
Nintendo doesn't exist, eh? Well damn.
 
Sony can't bow out with them integrating so much still into their PS3.

But in afraid in the case they do. Microsoft's 720 coming out with no real next gen competitor is a scary thought. They can basically do what they want to do.

Seeing as next gen doesn't start until Sony says it does, the industry is basically going to be in a vacuum. There is no next gen.
 
What does that have to do with winning money? MSFT has lost money during the Xbox 360 generation (mainly because of extended warranty and shitty hardware), and let's not even talk about the Xbox generation.

They wanted to win money with the 360, but they have expended more than they earned, bad business for them. I said I don't expect either to pull out, but I can see why MSFT would be less interested than Sony.

It's true that the Xbox helped MSFT to have a much better image (I remember those pre-Xbox days just too well), but that already happened, MSFT has the good will of people, Windows 7 is a good OS, as good as it gets, the Xboxs are functioning now, but what reason do they have to continue on a market that has costed them billions of dollars? A new console means bleeding money you don't know you'll gain... Unless you want them to basically make a new Wii...

LOL, just see how the SEGA first party teams are doing now. If you buy them, who'll buy them back? I'm sorry, but Sony has invested a lot of money, to me that means they will definitely continue making consoles.

What's the old saying? It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you are a fool than to open it and let everyone know you are.

360 gen has almost certainly been profitable and the 360 is currently making more money per year than the best year Sony ever had with the Playstation.
 

[Nintex]

Member
Nintendo doesn't exist, eh? Well damn.

Nintendo once again said they don't care what their competitors do. So you won't see Nintendo and Microsoft competing in the Killzone/Halo, Gran Turismo/Forza, Uncharted/Gears of War etc. way trying to 1-up each other every step of the way. With Nintendo the line-up for fall 2013 could be Steel Diver U and Wii U Music because they don't give a fuck.
 
Don't Sony have like 15 studios under their belt in the gaming sector? Isn't it unrealistic to assume they'll be bowing out?

Whereas you have MS, who dropped(?) studios/exclusive contracts (Bungie) the past year or so, and put some of their active studios like Rare on to Kinect centric stuff? It seems more realistic to assume that MS is going a more ambitious route and working on a Kinect focused general entertainment product (TV/PC divergence) and bowing out of the console race
 

Jest

Member
If streaming is the subject, this pattern would make more sense for Microsoft so you can play your Xbox games on Wndows 8.
 

enzo_gt

tagged by Blackace
[Nintex];34196310 said:
Nintendo once again said they don't care what their competitors do. So you won't see Nintendo and Microsoft competing in the Killzone/Halo, Gran Turismo/Forza, Uncharted/Gears of War etc. way trying to 1-up each other every step of the way. With Nintendo the line-up for fall 2013 could be Steel Diver U and Wii U Music because they don't give a fuck.

^ this is the nicer, less asshole-ish version of my earlier post :p

I'm a MS dude myself but c'mon Sony needs to be there because MS double checks what Sony does before it makes a move.. Not Nintendo. Everyone's eyeing the casual market and looking to eachother on what to do to improve what they offer, and Ninty might have kicked some of that off with its bold moves with the Wii that helped expand the industry a fair bit, but when it comes to the kind of gaming experiences Sony/MS consistently fight over market control over, there needs to be competition. And the experiences and philosophies that Nintendo has are different from the other two. Whether they be good things or bad ones; they're plain different. That much is clear.

Works vice-versa for Sony with MS too.
 

Mikey Jr.

Member
Jesus, if MS are the only hardcore platform left if Sony leaves, I might just have to abandon console gaming.

I'm not paying 50 bucks a year to play fucking online which would go up knowing MS.
 

Busaiku

Member
Why do so many think Sony would be more likely to drop out of the hardware game, when their console/handheld business has been one of their most profitable divisions for years?
 
I wouldn't miss Sony at all! There is just no way this is true though...

Even if it's one of the manufacturers taking a shocking approach though... that would make e3 so amazing!

e3 hype increased
 

TheOddOne

Member
Don't Sony have like 15 studios under their belt in the gaming sector? Isn't it unrealistic to assume they'll be bowing out?

Whereas you have MS, who dropped(?) studios/exclusive contracts (Bungie) the past year or so, and put some of their active studios like Rare on to Kinect centric stuff? It seems more realistic to assume that MS is going a more ambitious route and working on a Kinect focused general entertainment product (TV/PC divergence) and bowing out of the console race
I don't quite get this argument, because those studios will still be working on games but on maby a multiplatform basis. It will be hugely profitable for Sony, because they are selling it on multiple platforms. People still seem to forget that the PS3 destroyed their PS1 and PS2 profit, two generations of profit gone. There having a hard time as a company as a whole too.

This whole speculation doesn't hold much weight though, if there are clear signs and rumours that the next Xbox will be unveiled at E3, then that leaves them out of the equation. Why believe all other MS rumours and not this one? Just to fit this speculation's criteria? Why did MS then invest into new studios? Doesn't seem to hold much weight does it?
 
I don't quite get this argument, because those studios will still be working on games but on maby a multiplatform basis. It will be hugely profitable for Sony, because they are selling it on multiple platforms. People still seem to forget that the PS3 destroyed their PS1 and PS2 profit, two generations of profit gone. I highly doubt they will bow out though.

This whole speculation doesn't hold much weight though, if there are clear signs and rumours that the next Xbox will be unveiled at E3, then that leaves them out of the equation. Why believe all other MS rumours and not this one? Just to fit this speculation's criteria? Why did MS then invest into new studios? Doesn't seem to hold much weight does it?

Because MS have always aimed to take control of the living room, and I think that the whole Metro/Windows 8/Kinect direction they've been going is a pretty big departure from the traditional console race, and realistically I don't think they're going to try and juggle both of them

Whereas Sony have been pretty predictable since the start, fully invested in a more traditional market and given their portfolio of franchises and developers this generation, nothing much has changed from that

I just think if one of them were to 'bow out', it would be MS because they are more ambitious to capture a larger market, taking a similar radical move Nintendo made with the Wii
 

TheOddOne

Member
Because MS have always aimed to take control of the living room, and I think that the whole Metro/Windows 8/Kinect direction they've been going is a pretty big departure from the traditional console race, and realistically I don't think they're going to try and juggle both of them

Whereas Sony have been pretty predictable since the start, fully invested in a more traditional market and given their portfolio of franchises and developers this generation, nothing much has changed from that

I just think if one of them were to 'bow out', it would be MS because they are more ambitious to capture a larger market, taking a similar radical move Nintendo made with the Wii
The it would not be "bowing out", it would be opening your console up to a new audience. The console will still be there, play games and offer other services. Sony will also be doing this.
 
Why do so many think Sony would be more likely to drop out of the hardware game, when their console/handheld business has been one of their most profitable divisions for years?

Because it hasn't been the most profitable for years and has lost billions upon billions since the PS3 launched.
 
The it would not be "bowing out", it would be opening your console up to a new audience. The console will still be there, play games and offer other services. Sony will also be doing this.

It would still be 'bowing out' of the console race, in a traditional sense
There would be no 'xbox #' console itself, just a service across various current devices

Yep, similar to what is in that article.
It just feels more likely MS would be taking this step first, considering their slant towards the Kinect/Metro in the past months
 

TheOddOne

Member
It would still be 'bowing out' of the console race, in a traditional sense
There would be no 'xbox #' console itself, just a service across various current devices

Yep, similar to what is in that article.
It just feels more likely MS would be taking this step first, considering their slant towards the Kinect/Metro in the past months
All signs and rumours point to there being a dedicated console, so that will stay. So still not seeing the whole "bowing out" aspect.
 

Let me in

Member
Sony and Microsoft both want the living room, but only Microsoft has a competent plan for it. They've got the lock on content distribution strategy and it's consistent across all their products (WP, Xbox and soon Windows). Sony's strategy doesn't seem to have any direction or cohesion. For the past six years, we've seen Microsoft evolve their machine into a total entertainment solution through software. Sony's platform has remained the same with a few new icons.

If anyone goes, it would be Sony. Either that or they debut a significantly different next-gen experience a la Nintendo. I don't think they have the constitution to outspend Microsoft in a console horse race. Even if they did, their business units don't work well enough together to make things consistent for the consumer. How do their tablets, phones and PS3 tie together? They don't.

Their finances are already under pressure. They might not exit the business, but they can't lose huge money on their consoles anymore.
 

[Nintex]

Member
But Microsoft wouldn't 'bow out' of Xbox. Mattrick would invite Ballmer on stage, he'd come jumping on throwing PS3's and Wii's to the audience claiming they're dead while looking at Xbox saying that Xbox is the only cool thing and about to evolve. Circus du Soleil would start doing some kind of Voodoo dance, the Xbox would dissapear in smoke a screen with Windows 8 would come out and he'd start screaming that Xbox is now available anywhere on every Windows 8 device and is the best thing ever next to metro. It would certainly shake LA but they wouldn't 'bow out' in a Sega way.


Yeah, my fave Rare games are Halo, Forza and Fable.
They worked on all 3 actually : D
 

TheOddOne

Member
Sony and Microsoft both want the living room, but only Microsoft has a competent plan for it. They've got the lock on content distribution strategy and it's consistent across all their products (WP, Xbox and soon Windows). Sony's strategy doesn't seem to have any direction or cohesion. For the past six years, we've seen Microsoft evolve their machine into a total entertainment solution through software. Sony's platform has remained the same with a few new icons.

If anyone goes, it would be Sony. Either that or they debut a significantly different next-gen experience a la Nintendo. I don't think they have the constitution to outspend Microsoft in a console horse race. Even if they did, their business units don't work well enough together to make things consistent for the consumer. How do their tablets, phones and PS3 tie together? They don't.

Their finances are already under pressure. They might not exit the business, but they can't lose huge money on their consoles anymore.
This is basically my words, but more eloquently put :)
 

Fredrik

Member
If anyone is going to back down it's Microsoft. They're the one with few first party devs left and the one who could transform everything to Windows if they wanted to. They've already done it with the controller, Xbox Live and soon with Kinect and Metro-dashboard too and most of their own games comes to the PC anyway so. It's all set and it's all moving along just fine according to plan if you think about it that way.

I hope I'm wrong though... :(
 

Marco1

Member
What if the streaming service worked alongside the retail model.Similar to the online pass that comes with most retail purchases now. That would enable a slow transition over to streaming for those that can do it.
I suppose it all comes down to who has the logistics to enable it and want it. If the statement is true then it probably means we will see a roadmap for the future and not a "we are exiting the console business" statement.
 

NavNucST3

Member
Sony is more profitable with their TV's.

Building a TV with the PS3 tech AND having a cloud gaming service built in sounds reasonable

Gives a whole new meaning to the Playstation Network

The TV division hasn't been profitable in EIGHT years...Sony is currently an insurance company that sells loss leading electronics.
 
Top Bottom