• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Saudi Athlete to Withdraw If Not Allowed to Wear Hijab.

Status
Not open for further replies.

7aged

Member
"O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies. That will be better, that they should be known (as free respectable women) so as not to be annoyed. And Allah is Ever OftForgiving, Most Merciful." [Quran 33:59]

"And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts, etc.) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent, and to draw their veils all over Juyubihinna" [Quran 24:31]​

This without even citing the Hadiths

you want to start this debate? First of all, hijab doesn't literally mean veil in arabic. second, the ayah is specific to the wives of the prophet. third, there's no historical record of women wearing them at the time of the prophet. They were first introduced by Omar and for no reason other than to differentiate free women from slaves.
 
Wow, that sounds completely impractical. I suspect that's one of the bits that people simply discard.

These are things more to which you should aspire to, not what is immediately expected of you. In secondary school, there was an incredibly devout Muslim girl in my class who would rarely look at another boy in the eyes when speaking to him. But people are human and do obviously look/stare; the point is to discourage you from doing so.

you want to start this debate? First of all, hijab doesn't literally mean veil in arabic. second, the ayah is specific to the wives of the prophet. third, there's no historical record of women wearing them at the time of the prophet. They were first introduced by Omar and for no reason other than to differentiate free women from slaves.

I've had this debate many times before and I'm aware of the counter arguments. I'm not interested in debating it again. What is evident, however, is to - either through cultural tradition or religious upbringing, the majority of Muslim women cover their hair in response to the "awrah" command. Others go further in covering themselves entirely whereas a minority do neither. Without going into a theological debate, it is more than fair to surmise that the Hijab is considered mandatory in the majority of the Muslim world
 
iHCVVCI5Xq0Vo.png

This makes TDKR worth it. Thank you.
 

Hindle

Banned
It would cause a lot of resentment if they bend the rules to please muslims, the games dont need that. So it's rather she takes it off or she withdraws.
 

RubxQub

φίλω ἐξεχέγλουτον καί ψευδολόγον οὖκ εἰπόν
Not every Muslim abstains from alcohol either, that doesn't mean it is allowed. You can apply that to many examples. But the fact of the matter is a hijab is not optional. Come on guys, use some common sense.

It is optional, no matter what you say. Just because it isn't optional TO HER doesn't mean it isn't optional in general. She chooses to be muslim...and with that decision comes consequences. In this case, she can't participate in the Olympic judo competition.

Tough cookies...she knew the rules before and went anyways.

No one should be forced to change their rules because of religion.
 
http://www.itv.com/news/update/2012-07-29/ioc-confident-saudi-hijab-issue-will-be-resolved/

So there's still a chance this gets resolved.

I did look up Wojdan Shaherkani though and she yet to participate in international competition. Why is she in the Olympics? The IOC wanted a woman from each nation so they allowed her to compete despite not even qualifying, let alone competing in a tournament.

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatche...ondon-olympics-saudi-arabia-2-female-athletes
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jul/13/olympics-2012-saudi-women
Very poor precedent.
 
K

kittens

Unconfirmed Member
Awesome. I can't believe how many people in this thread are shitting on her for standing up to a bullshit, racist policy.
 

SmokyDave

Member
These are things more to which you should aspire to, not what is immediately expected of you. In secondary school, there was an incredibly devout Muslim girl in my class who would rarely look at another boy in the eyes when speaking to him. But people are human and do obviously look/stare; the point is to discourage you from doing so.
It's a part that is difficult to practice...but one should endeavour to follow.
Ah, so it's a suggestion, not an order. Wouldn't that stand for the hijab too?


Awesome. I can't believe how many people in this thread are shitting on her for standing up to a bullshit, racist policy.
1: Read the OP (She hasn't stood up to anything).
2: Look up the definition of 'racist'
3: Reconsider your viewpoint.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Awesome. I can't believe how many people in this thread are shitting on her for standing up to a bullshit, racist policy.

The policy isn't racist, no jewelery, no head coverings, etc. It's like that so he opponent doesn't accidentally kill her. If she was allowed to wear it her competitors would need to be more careful than usual when fighting her putting them at a disadvantage. If they weren't then she might die. A blue belt has no place at the Olympics anyway.
 

ChiTownBuffalo

Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
Awesome. I can't believe how many people in this thread are shitting on her for standing up to a bullshit, racist policy.

I think there is an alternative, the sport hijab, but I also think she is going to get his ass kicked.
 

Pimpwerx

Member
Withdraw. Rules are rules. There's a safety concern, so that's the end of it. If she wants to compete bad enough, she can take it off. Religion is religion, and sports are sports. If your god won't let you briefly bend a rule in order to accomplish a life-long goal, then...sucks for you. PEACE.
 

liger05

Member
you want to start this debate? First of all, hijab doesn't literally mean veil in arabic. second, the ayah is specific to the wives of the prophet. third, there's no historical record of women wearing them at the time of the prophet. They were first introduced by Omar and for no reason other than to differentiate free women from slaves.

No. The Niqab was worn by the wives of of the prophet (saw) and sahaba.

In terms of clothing the Quran never says 'tell your wives'. It says 'believing women'.
 

RubxQub

φίλω ἐξεχέγλουτον καί ψευδολόγον οὖκ εἰπόν
Awesome. I can't believe how many people in this thread are shitting on her for standing up to a bullshit, racist policy.

Racist? What the hell?! :lol
 

F#A#Oo

Banned
Awesome. I can't believe how many people in this thread are shitting on her for standing up to a bullshit, racist policy.

It's not racist...

The IOC have their rules...if it goes against their rules she should withdraw.

Now if later the IOC want to introduce a headgear allowance to allow muslim women to compete in Judo that's their own discussion to be had but it's not the time now to have such discussions as it's just not practical.
 

marrec

Banned
That was the first thing that came to my mind. She has no say in this whatsoever.

I would think that even if she said it directly, she still has no say in it because she would fear the repercussions of doing anything else. Lets not pretend if she fought without the Hijab everyone in Saudi Arabia would just casually shrug their shoulders.
 
Making women wear certain clothing is way easier then not looking at stuff that makes you hot.

Although those verses specifically refer to women, they are also used to require both genders to wear loose, baggy clothing that are not form fitting. A popular example of this are some Muslim soccer players who wear leg pants as it is Muslim tradition for them to cover to at least their knee.
 

cousins

Member
I would think that even if she said it directly, she still has no say in it because she would fear the repercussions of doing anything else. Lets not pretend if she fought without the Hijab everyone in Saudi Arabia would just casually shrug their shoulders.

Hell yeah, this is Saudi Arabia that we're talking about. She'd probably be stoned to death or something once people stop paying attention to her.
 

marrec

Banned
Although those verses specifically refer to women, they are also used to require both genders to wear loose, baggy clothing that are not form fitting. A popular example of this are some Muslim soccer players who wear leg pants as it is Muslim tradition for them to cover to at least their knee.

True enough, but Muslim men are not required to cover up their hair.
 

Alucrid

Banned
Although those verses specifically refer to women, they are also used to require both genders to wear loose, baggy clothing that are not form fitting. A popular example of this are some Muslim soccer players who wear leg pants as it is Muslim tradition for them to cover to at least their knee.

I can never convert to Islam now :(
 
Although those verses specifically refer to women, they are also used to require both genders to wear loose, baggy clothing that are not form fitting. A popular example of this are some Muslim soccer players who wear leg pants as it is Muslim tradition for them to cover to at least their knee.

Islam is anti-skinny jeans?

Even a hardcore atheist like me can find common ground with that!
 

hom3land

Member
Just curious how this works. Arabian women need permission from their men to travel abroad, correct? How do they officially get it? Is there a form that requires her father's or husbands signature?
 
True enough, but Muslim men are not required to cover up their hair.

The reasoning behind it being hair is considered to be a defining element of a woman's "beauty" or attractiveness in many cultures, more so than it is for men. It is similar to the Jewish Tznit; married women being required to cover their hair. Look at paintings of Mary; she is always depicted in wearing a head scarf. The entire theme of these restrictions is to promote humility and modesty by lessening desires based on physical attraction.

There is nothing specific about the hair itself in the Quran admittedly, but at some point in history (possibly originating from Judaism) the covering of the hair became the main way women fulfilled this. Islam continued this theme of a "veil" and its connotations. Coincidentally, I believe the wedding veil originated from this theme.
 

Despera

Banned
The reasoning behind it being hair is considered to be a defining element of a woman's "beauty" or attractiveness in many cultures, more so than it is for men. It is similar to the Jewish Tznit; married women being required to cover their hair. Look at paintings of Mary; she is always depicted in wearing a head scarf. The entire theme of these restrictions is to promote humility and modesty by lessening desires based on physical attraction
What if I find hijab sexier than the hair it's covering?
 
But last week, International Judo Federation (IJF) president Marius Vizer said Shaherkani would have to fight without a headscarf to comply with "the principle and spirit of judo".
What!? Do they not realize this is bigger than that!!

This is the SPIRIT OF A NINJA!!!

164F2DFE-9C50-43FF-B63D-8134154628C7_mw800_s.jpg
 

marrec

Banned
The reasoning behind it being hair is considered to be a defining element of a woman's "beauty" or attractiveness in many cultures, more so than it is for men. It is similar to the Jewish Tznit; married women being required to cover their hair. Look at paintings of Mary; she is always depicted in wearing a head scarf. The entire theme of these restrictions is to promote humility and modesty by lessening desires based on physical attraction

Don't think I'm accusing just Islam of being sexist in it's dogma, but specifically restricting a woman from showing her hair regardless of excuse is sexist. You are forcing a woman to be modest in her beauty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom