The shift to origin only left a serious amount of money on the table. I never understood the decision.
I used to buy EA pc games. I have not spent a dime on an EA pc game since they moved to origin.
Yep, this is why I brought it up, since the moves boldness cost them in regards to some potential users. A lot of people got burned by their decision and opted to not follow through on buying EA games. I personally haven't bought a game on origin either other than Battlefield 3. It was not a decision made out of hate, just a general sense of "I really can't be bothered loading up origin every time to play 1 or 2 games".
Add to that, I speak from personal experience here only, but the amount of marketing that went into games like Crysis 3 for example, nearly every major gaming site had huge advertisements regarding its release....yet when it came out it felt like it was a ninja release. What I was seeing was a reminder that the game existed and had a man holding a bow in it all over the place, but was it showing up in the Steam "coming soon" list where it would actually pique my interest? no it wasn't
Again, this isn't about Steam vs. Origin, it's just me pondering whether the large push in marketing power for their games and platform worked towards or against them, in contrast to say, higher visibility on steam's store front.
I agree we will probably never truly know but it's a question worth asking to since it's generally from consumer response that we can guess.