• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Last of Us - Review Thread [Emargo up, scores in OP.]

Status
Not open for further replies.

KageMaru

Member

Thank you sir, that's the review I've been waiting for.

Well fuck them to in that case.

Always knew they were Microsoft loyalists. No surprise there.

This is the shit that pisses me off the most. Again, it's not about the opinion.

The person who reviewed the game can think whatever he wants to think.

IT"S THE SCORE ATTACHED. They knew it would stir controversy among the sony fanboys, and generate hits on N4G and other sites and they'll fucking get it.

You are cracking me up. I don't see much questioning the perfect reviews, but an 8 will bother some people. It's a review, an opinion, they will be different.

Honestly I don't wear the tinfoil hats and assume lower reviews are put out to stir up the fanboys, but that would be funny if that were really the case.
 

Cyberia

Member
The perfect scores so far:
Hahahaha
IGN 10/10
Eurogamer 10/10
Eurogamer IT/Sp 10/10
Edge 10/10
CVG 10/10
Destructoid 10/10
Gamereactor 10/10
VideoGamer 10/10
thesixaxis 10/10
ibtimes 10/10
PS-Lifestyle 10/10
Digital Spy 10/10
Machinima 10/10
Digital Fix 10/10
Post Arcade 10/10
speciogames 10/10
Gamingbolt 10/10
Godisageek 10/10
OPM 10/10
Pushsquare 10/10
PS-Nation 10/10
Giantbomb 5/5
Techdigest 5/5
Gamesradar 5/5
TheMirror 5/5
Guardian 5/5
Telegraph 5/5
Gameblog 5/5
CheatCodeCentral 5/5
Adam Sessler 5/5

Eurogamer PT too:
http://www.eurogamer.pt/articles/2013-06-05-the-last-of-us-analise?page=3

Metro 9/10
http://metro.co.uk/2013/06/05/the-last-of-us-review-clicking-together-3829335/
 
Of course Polygon trolled the review...of course they did.

Somewhere in their board room I can hear them say, "this was a nearly perfect game and will get amazing scores. how can we stand out from the rest of them?" They're racking their brains and Gies, sitting silently says, "Violence...we'll speak ill of the violence." A hush falls over the rest of the reviewers as he continues, "linear design, lackluster enemies, we'll troll Naughty Dog at what they do best."
 
That's not my point. My point is that people always complain when review sites tend to stick to the 7-10 scale, but look at this thread. Look at how many readers are furious - furious! - that Polygon dared to give a highly-anticipated game a 7.5/10. It's insane. No wonder gaming sites seem to feel trapped by the score scale.

There's really not that many. It's a handful of guys going overboard and then lots more people quoting them pointing it out.
 

.la1n

Member
I was going to put this off until later in the year after some price drops but I might bite the bullet and preorder on PSN.
 
hey c'mon


uncharted 2 is a lot better than infinite.


but yeah b:i really did strike me at times as a cynical frankenstein of a game designed to hit a bunch of bulletpoints that reviewers love.

Infinite is one of the worst games I've played this generation, which is why I can not stand this 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9.5 10 10 culture
 

strafer

member
The perfect scores so far:
Hahahaha
IGN 10/10
Eurogamer 10/10
Eurogamer IT/Sp 10/10
Edge 10/10
CVG 10/10
Destructoid 10/10
Gamereactor 10/10
VideoGamer 10/10
thesixaxis 10/10
ibtimes 10/10
PS-Lifestyle 10/10
Digital Spy 10/10
Machinima 10/10
Digital Fix 10/10
Post Arcade 10/10
speciogames 10/10
Gamingbolt 10/10
Godisageek 10/10
OPM 10/10
Pushsquare 10/10
PS-Nation 10/10
Giantbomb 5/5
Techdigest 5/5
Gamesradar 5/5
TheMirror 5/5
Guardian 5/5
Telegraph 5/5
Gameblog 5/5
CheatCodeCentral 5/5
Adam Sessler 5/5

reachp3kcl.gif
 

PBY

Banned
Polygon are entitled to give whatever score they want, but I do feel that a review holds a certain amount of responsibility to the consumer insofar as not to let your own personal view influence the score too much.
I should clarify that and say that when I read a review, I want to know if I would like it; not whether someone who MAY have vastly different tastes to me thinks of it. I suppose, this is an impossible request.
I wholly disagree. Why do we have so many review sites?

I love that games criticism has (slowly) moved away from just reviewing consumer products to critiquing entertainment.
 

OSHAN

Member
People People can we stop talking about the Polygon review. Sometimes games don't click with individuals. I have friends that don't like SMG. I personally worship at that altar but it does nothing for them. No product ever released is going to appease everyones tastes so can we cut the guy some slack and recognize his review will likely reflect a group of people that will definitely think the same thing and in that case his review is a great barometer for them.

Lets move on.

No!
 
Uncharted 2 and 3 did not provide deep emotional responses at all. BI didn't either until the very end. From the sounds of it TLoU does.

Why does everybody keep thinking "emotional responses" are "sad"

Do you not feel joy of a well-placed headshot? The thrill of a great set piece? The suspense of a stealth sequence? Those are all emotional responses...
 
The Polygon score is probably more about Polygon making a name for themselves as a 'legit' reviewing site, and not dishing out 10s when most others do.

That's fine, but I wouldn't put much weight into it. Their complaints however, may be more significant to some gamers than others - I for one, don't want waves of enemies like Uncharted had, so we'll see.
 

keit4

Banned
You guys are cracking me up. I don't see much questioning the perfect reviews, but an 8 will bother some people. It's a review, an opinion, they will be different.

Honestly I don't wear the tinfoil hats and assume lower reviews are put out to stir up the fanboys, but that would be funny if that were really the case.

My post was a joke lol
 

sonicmj1

Member
That's not my point. My point is that people always complain when review sites tend to stick to the 7-10 scale, but look at this thread. Look at how many readers are furious - furious! - that Polygon dared to give a highly-anticipated game a 7.5/10. It's insane. No wonder gaming sites seem to feel trapped by the score scale.

It's rather likely that the people wishing for a wider scoring spread aren't the same people who lose their shit when a highly anticipated game gets a low score. At least, I hope so.

Ideally you'd want both groups as an audience, I guess, so I can see why a site would want to try to please everyone. I wouldn't mind if sites dropped scores altogether (that's Kotaku's stance), but I know that sort of thing pisses off a section of the audience too.
 
That's all I needed to hear to want this game even more, the game's length. So glad the game is pretty long, I always hated short games because I can usually beat them in a short time. Also it has multiplayer, and if it isn't too bad the trophies might be fun to get to.
 

Sky Chief

Member
Damn, 10/10 from Edge! I am not even reading any of these reviews because I am on blackout but that surprised me.

I don't see why anyone cares about anything that Polygon does, they have proven that they have no credibility or integrity over and over and over again and the site has only been live for a few months. Anyway, they might have some good points and I don't think any game should ever get all perfect scores.
 

kick51

Banned
isn't weird that the first thing some people thought of after reviews for a game came out was whether or not the employees get bonuses for making it?


There's a gif for this situation...I'll let someone else do the honors.
 

Phreak47

Member
Uncharted 2 has much better combat, story, characters, and set pieces than Tomb Raider but I liked the platforming and puzzle solving a bit more in TR. That said, I thought TR was just pretty good while Uncharted 2 may be the best game of the generation.

TR was very good, but my biggest complaint was it was a bit too easy. I played it on Hard difficulty straight away.. yet most of my deaths were environmental (whoops, I fell off the cliff)... a few battle sections took a few tries but mostly, and especially at the end, I was disappointed with how easily one could breeze through it.

Anyway, back OT... gonna be a review junkie today for TLOU... AW YEAH
 

nib95

Banned
We have a few people who are mad a few who desperately trying to fan the flames since this topic was made.

This. Some people have been trying to fan the flames non stop since the thread was made. Many have wanted meltdowns and low scores. Pretty silly how much egging on and exaggerating is taking place.
 

kairu

Member
I'm surprised by Polygon's score not because of the score itself, but because of how different it is from all the other review's I've read.

The negative parts of Phil's review focus mainly around how he expected it to be more than a videogame in terms of mechanics, tech, and felt its where it did come up short hurt his opinion of it more because of how immersive the game is. He didn't like how the combat felt, which is a very personal part to gaming and I think anyone is justified in feeling (I didnt particularly like Bioshock Infinite's feel of combat, but think the game was great). I think that personally a lot of his criticisms, while valid for him, dont hold as much weight for me. The fact that your AI partners can't be seen in a game with stealth is... fantastic, and a necessary evil in my mind. I can't imagine how frustrated I'd be if that constantly got be into combat.

Pretty much all I hope to see from games that I am looking forward to is "CAN it be enjoyed". If the reviews seem to support that its possible, and I already feel some affinity toward the game, then I'll probably like it well enough that its worth a purchase.
 

antitrop

Member
Why does everybody keep thinking "emotional responses" are "sad"

Do you not feel joy of a well-placed headshot? The thrill of a great set piece? The suspense of a stealth sequence? Those are all emotional responses...

It's BIONIC-ARMMMMMM trolling me over a comment I made about Bioshock 2 a few weeks ago.
 
isn't weird that the first thing some people thought of after reviews for a game came out was whether or not the employees get bonuses for making it?

Do first party developers even have to worry about that? I thought the bonuses thing were just something contract devs had to be concerned with.
 

hawk2025

Member
Infinite is one of the worst games I've played this generation, which is why I can not stand this 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9.5 10 10 culture


One of the worst game of the generation?

C'mon now, there's no need for massive hyperbole. It's impossible to take you seriously after reading this.
 

GlamFM

Banned
That's not my point. My point is that people always complain when review sites tend to stick to the 7-10 scale, but look at this thread. Look at how many readers are furious - furious! - that Polygon dared to give a highly-anticipated game a 7.5/10. It's insane. No wonder gaming sites seem to feel trapped by the score scale.

Useless discussion. In the end it doesn´t matter. No review will regardless the scale used will tell me if I will like this game.
Good to know that the reviewer liked the game - but why should I care about that?
I just bought Remember me so....

That being said I think everybody should use the 5 point scale so we could get rid of all this nonsense.
Polygon would have given the game 4 (Stars/Points/Doritos/Whatever..) and nobody would get upset.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom