phil_t98
#SonyToo
A
Ahh right
So that's why it wasn't important to inform us, they had the stats and as they said "we are better off without you" so that was enough.
on a side note it would be cool if we could see the stats i guess
A
Ahh right
Overall, this was a heart-warming thread in general despite it went into a slightly off direction. Wanna thank my dearBigBooper for this brilliant thread, and he would look perfect with a tag of "Lusts for his fiernds".
![]()
I still have a fair few friends on Xbox who haven't been active in years but i hope one day they will jump back on
They're on PS4/5 now.
/s
Hope they're doing well! Also I think permabans should only be for extreme insults, extreme antagonization, extreme bad behavior. For console warring it should only be timed, with 6-12 months max.
But hey, that's only my opinion.
They ain't on PlayStation either, i have there tags on there to.
i think shit posting in threads should defiantly be perminatly bannable. Look at JR for example, got a ban and got it overturned and continued in the exact same mindset he was in befor his ban. I know its only one example but its the first i seen unbanned from a perma ban. We have lost some good people on here due to warring i will agree that but it is good to open up threads and see genuine discussions on games by people who love them and not just shitting on them because they ain't on their brand of choice.
And you opinion is valid also
It's like having a football forum, you really can't totally suppress the fanbases as they'll eventually flee to other platforms. Also if this forum was about cellphones you would expect much worse wars between iOS/Android owners. It's just human nature, we're born in a competitive mindset collectively.
Nah, BadStory stood by while a "preferred" member falsely accused me of political wrongthink - branding me a "Putin apologist" and coward when I had previously said I hated Putin - and did nothing. Even though this is defamatory and abusive per section 2a of the TOS:White knighting? I'm sorry if you get the impression that I'm defending moderators here. As I have already mentioned, moderators aren't perfect and any fuck up on their part us a conversation between them, administrative team and the recipient of the ban. If you don't thinkethomaz deserved the ban, then PM @EviLore and lodged a complaint. You can also bitch about the "transparency" to him as well.
(Actually, doing nothing would have been fine; he made it worse: Imagine saying "I hate Sony," and then getting accused of being a Sony apologist and coward. After logic and reason get you nowhere with this arrogant prick who doubles down on his defamatory logical fallacies, you begin to mock him. Then you get in trouble. This is unequal and biased application of the TOS. It's clearly a top-down issue.)You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use NeoGAF to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing
Nah, BadStory stood by while a "preferred" member falsely accused me of political wrongthink - branding me a "Putin apologist" and coward when I had previously said I hated Putin - and did nothing. Even though this is defamatory and abusive per section 2a of the TOS:
(Actually, doing nothing would have been fine; he made it worse: Imagine saying "I hate Sony," and then getting accused of being a Sony apologist and coward. After logic and reason get you nowhere with this arrogant prick who doubles down on his defamatory logical fallacies, you begin to mock him. Then you get in trouble. This is unequal and biased application of the TOS. It's clearly a top-down issue.)
And yes, defending "we're better off without you" as a fine explanation for why someone was permabanned is clearly white-knighting. Ass-kissing, really. Are you applying for the job?
In a forum where free speech is valued, banning someone should not be easy; it should be hard. It should be an absolute last resort, and should be done in such a way that leaves no room for reasonable doubt or conjecture. From this standpoint, "we're better off without you" might as well be "Nyah!" It communicates the exact same level of infantile hubris.
Faust , I respect you attempting to explain what happened, but the lengthiness of your post speaks volumes about the confusion surrounding this issue. And the point
Shmunter made still stands: moderation is a black box mystery to everyone outside the box. Stating that somebody has X number of this, that, or whatever does absolutely zero to resolve this. Actually, it makes it worse: now we all want to know what exactly each one of those other things were, and if *they* were justified.
Just saying "console warring is not subjective" does not make it so. And giving a few examples, but then saying the list is not exhaustive, ironically makes it seem more subjective, not less.
I personally like this forum. I don't want to see it become another resetera or twatter. We sound the alarm because we care. Subjectivity, inconsistency, and now hubris are red flags that signal we are well on the way downhill.
Nah, BadStory stood by while a "preferred" member falsely accused me of political wrongthink - branding me a "Putin apologist" and coward when I had previously said I hated Putin - and did nothing. Even though this is defamatory and abusive per section 2a of the TOS:
(Actually, doing nothing would have been fine; he made it worse: Imagine saying "I hate Sony," and then getting accused of being a Sony apologist and coward. After logic and reason get you nowhere with this arrogant prick who doubles down on his defamatory logical fallacies, you begin to mock him. Then you get in trouble. This is unequal and biased application of the TOS. It's clearly a top-down issue.)
And yes, defending "we're better off without you" as a fine explanation for why someone was permabanned is clearly white-knighting. Ass-kissing, really. Are you applying for the job?
In a forum where free speech is valued, banning someone should not be easy; it should be hard. It should be an absolute last resort, and should be done in such a way that leaves no room for reasonable doubt or conjecture. From this standpoint, "we're better off without you" might as well be "Nyah!" It communicates the exact same level of infantile hubris.
Faust , I respect you attempting to explain what happened, but the lengthiness of your post speaks volumes about the confusion surrounding this issue. And the point
Shmunter made still stands: moderation is a black box mystery to everyone outside the box. Stating that somebody has X number of this, that, or whatever does absolutely zero to resolve this. Actually, it makes it worse: now we all want to know what exactly each one of those other things were, and if *they* were justified.
Just saying "console warring is not subjective" does not make it so. And giving a few examples, but then saying the list is not exhaustive, ironically makes it seem more subjective, not less.
I personally like this forum. I don't want to see it become another resetera or twatter. We sound the alarm because we care. Subjectivity, inconsistency, and now hubris are red flags that signal we are well on the way downhill.
How many users that were banned with no clear reasoning given in the "ban" page were actually defended for consecutive days?
I am seeing people here defending ethomaz since this thread was open, but do they stand up for everyone? In the last 5 days a bunch of people was banned and I only see people defending ethomaz.
![]()
Look... I have nothing against ethomaz. I have seen him trolling and heating up some discussions involving Xbox or PlayStation, but I never really cared. I actually think he also did some nice posts along the way, and some terrible ones. But can we just move on? I'm sure he will be fine. And eventually, if he wishes, he might even come back with a different account, who knows... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
console warriors getting banned ALWAYS have their warrior allies second guessing mods hoping they'll get reinstated.How many users that were banned with no clear reasoning given in the "ban" page were actually defended for consecutive days?
I am seeing people here defending ethomaz since this thread was open, but do they stand up for everyone? In the last 5 days a bunch of people was banned and I only see people defending ethomaz.
![]()
Look... I have nothing against ethomaz. I have seen him trolling and heating up some discussions involving Xbox or PlayStation, but I never really cared. I actually think he also did some nice posts along the way, and some terrible ones. But can we just move on? I'm sure he will be fine. And eventually, if he wishes, he might even come back with a different account, who knows... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Being a pc gamer is not only the best, it's the most virtuous. We can all aspire to be pc gamers, how can we aLl become so worthy!?!console warriors getting banned ALWAYS have their warrior allies second guessing mods hoping they'll get reinstated.
Think of it like the movie 300. Brave in big numbers when they can take turns backing each other up. But when they start getting chopped down, the collective fan warrior battalion crumbles.
And the past year or two has been a huge purge of console warriors. Amazingly, PC gaming can have the best specs (always have the opportunity too assuming you spend some decent coin to get the latest gear). I don't think I remember one permabanned member being a PC master race elitist when you'd think if there's one gamer who can gloat the most with peak visuals, cheap games, free online etc… but the average PC rig gamer doesn't seem to give a shit. When was the last time you saw a forum of PC gamers hit each other over the head baiting each other whose got the better GPU brand? Never seen it here.
console warriors getting banned ALWAYS have their warrior allies second guessing mods hoping they'll get reinstated.
Think of it like the movie 300. Brave in big numbers when they can take turns backing each other up. But when they start getting chopped down, the collective fan warrior battalion crumbles.
And the past year or two has been a huge purge of console warriors. Amazingly, PC gaming can have the best specs (always have the opportunity too assuming you spend some decent coin to get the latest gear). I don't think I remember one permabanned member being a PC master race elitist when you'd think if there's one gamer who can gloat the most with peak visuals, cheap games, free online etc… but the average PC rig gamer doesn't seem to give a shit. When was the last time you saw a forum of PC gamers hit each other over the head baiting each other whose got the better GPU brand? Never seen it here.
How many users that were banned with no clear reasoning given in the "ban" page were actually defended for consecutive days?
I am seeing people here defending ethomaz since this thread was open, but do they stand up for everyone? In the last 5 days a bunch of people was banned and I only see people defending ethomaz.
![]()
Look... I have nothing against ethomaz. I have seen him trolling and heating up some discussions involving Xbox or PlayStation, but I never really cared. I actually think he also did some nice posts along the way, and some terrible ones. But can we just move on? I'm sure he will be fine. And eventually, if he wishes, he might even come back with a different account, who knows... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Nope, I deliberately live the forever-alone gaming life.
![]()
Ban discussion aside, If we're pouring out tales about loss and grief, spare a thought for Manchester United fans like myself.
Absolutely dire times.
Ban discussion aside, If we're pouring out tales about loss and grief, spare a thought for Manchester United fans like myself.
Absolutely dire times.
Ever heard of VFXVeteran who spends his life trolling console threads ?
Here I was thinking we could now become neogaf friends, with our own new 2 man crew!Still got his reddish Irish ass on my PSN, seen him making record on GT7 license trials and trying to beat him.![]()
Rivet reacted to everything withLike
Oh no, invite revoked!
Oh no, invite revoked!
I think I'd get myself banned to avoid you after that too![]()
Yes, the complete lack of self awareness makes me laugh.
It's my way of sincerely thanking people for bringing joy to my day.
Leicester for me bud (I support the team, from the city I was born in)![]()
Just don't support Liverpool, please.
And the Triggered emojis ? That your way of telling us to watch our backs ?![]()
Leicester for me bud (I support the team, from the city I was born in)
That being said we are looking pretty awful, think we've lost 29 points or along them lines from games we've been ahead in. (Beyond depressing)
Just making fun of you obviously, but it's also a way to thank you for bringing fun to my day obviously. I don't understand why people take it so bad.
I'm sure you will endure worse things in your life than a trigger emoji. We're talking about video games here, not nuclear weapons. Why so serious ?![]()
Exactly.
I remember that like it was yesterday and it still makes me laugh. God bless that blue sister for going into battle.He went on twitter and was arguing with a guy who designed the latest Xbox saying it wasn't RDNA2 when the Xbox designer was saying it was. Doesn't get more warrior than that
Oh man me too! Believe me I really like you and hope one day we can meet in person.
You're from Brazil, right? Let's meet there...Oh man me too! Believe me I really like you and hope one day we can meet in person.![]()
" and a lot of Brazil politics posts (I cant read Spanish but could tell it had to do with politics or elections etc..)"
Is that you john wayne? Is this me?
You again?I'd just like to say that I hope the moderation here isn't like how it is on Era. I'm never getting over the fact that I was banned for two months over literally just quoting someone in a Star Citizen thread and saying "you again?" to them. And no, I'm not being disingenuous and leaving important context out lol
I'd just like to say that I hope the moderation here isn't like how it is on Era. I'm never getting over the fact that I was banned for two months over literally just quoting someone in a Star Citizen thread and saying "you again?" to them. And no, I'm not being disingenuous and leaving important context out lol
Good to know! I honestly got so used to the feeling of walking on eggshells so it feels kind of weird here lolWe are absolutely not like them. Any and all bans are discussed before hand and usually only after any and all previous attempts to correct the problem have been tried. Unless of course certain lines are crossed such as blatant racism.