Physics is not free.Still have no clue why they went from this to the cell shaded ps2 looking games they released on switch.
Nintendo is allergic to anti aliasing, its crazy they keep releasing games with such simple graphics full of jaggies
No one in here will ever convince me that E-Day doesn't look fantastic, especially if The Coalition are indeed able to hit their goal of DRS 4K with hardware RT, and 60 fps on console.
From Teardown dev.
Nintendo is allergic to anti aliasing, its crazy they keep releasing games with such simple graphics full of jaggies
![]()
Nintendo will save us, my fellow graphics whores.
Most of the games shown were indeed next gen. problem is that wolverine and gears fail to look better than indie games, that will dominate the discussion.I don't really understand the general disappointment here after the past week. We are finally getting current gen looking games and you guys are this underwhelmed?
I will get a lot of flak for this but this is the price of that f'n 60 fps obsession many of you have. This delusion only started this gen that designing a game with 60 fps in mind is the same as designing one with 30 (talking about consoles of course). In previous gens this was common knowledge between devs and players alike that you can have mindblowing visuals or better performance on console, and devs had to decide which one they wanted. But thanks to the 60fps cult devs were happy because all they had to do now was to use their prevgen engines have 2 modes where the difference is mostly in resolution and call it a day. But of course then the crying was about the missing jump in visuals. Somehow they figured out to have this small jump at 60 fps now at least so we should be happy.
Of course if it was up to me I would say have everything designed with 30 fps in mind and even at 1440 or 1080p and melt our faces, but that's just me.
I vaguely remember the reveal years ago being a looker...Kingdom Hearts 4 lmao
![]()
![]()
We are almost reaching that Wii U tech demo
![]()
You really fucking put until down 2 in that list over gears or plague tale or tomb raider uh...Most of the games shown were indeed next gen. problem is that wolverine and gears fail to look better than indie games, that will dominate the discussion.
i think this was a good e3 with lots of stunning games shown.
my top 10:
- ILL
- Halo remake
- God Of War Laundry
- Silent Hill Townfall
- College Football
- genAtlas
- Stellar Blade 2
- Until Dawn 2
- RE Code Veronica
- Crossfire
ok, replace until dawn with tomb raider but keep that ps3 era lighting in plauges tale in the trash bin where it belongs. right next to wolverine.You really fucking put until down 2 in that list over gears or plague tale or tomb raider uh...
Yep, and the game at its best look even better than your pics tbh.I know Gothic Remake is not pushing any boundaries but honestly, its very pleasant to my eyes. I enjoy the graphics and art direction
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yep, and the game at its best look even better than your pics tbh.
The outdoors dark nights are particularly great.
It's funny how you think that bad of plague while bojii thought it was the best graphic of the eventok, replace until dawn with tomb raider but keep that ps3 era lighting in plauges tale in the trash bin where it belongs. right next to wolverine.
you can put gears at 11. at least its competent.
I dont get this post. Yes its underwhelming and yes we blame a lot of it on the pursuit of 60fps which you also agree with... so whats the issue?I don't really understand the general disappointment here after the past week. We are finally getting current gen looking games and you guys are this underwhelmed?
I will get a lot of flak for this but this is the price of that f'n 60 fps obsession many of you have. This delusion only started this gen that designing a game with 60 fps in mind is the same as designing one with 30 (talking about consoles of course). In previous gens this was common knowledge between devs and players alike that you can have mindblowing visuals or better performance on console, and devs had to decide which one they wanted. But thanks to the 60fps cult devs were happy because all they had to do now was to use their prevgen engines have 2 modes where the difference is mostly in resolution and call it a day. But of course then the crying was about the missing jump in visuals. Somehow they figured out to have this small jump at 60 fps now at least so we should be happy.
Of course if it was up to me I would say have everything designed with 30 fps in mind and even at 1440 or 1080p and melt our faces, but that's just me.
I also found Gears to be awesome in addition to your list. Though I agree about Wolverine, that's just a big disappointment. Strange because Rift Apart is one of the few mindblowing games this gen.Most of the games shown were indeed next gen. problem is that wolverine and gears fail to look better than indie games, that will dominate the discussion.
i think this was a good e3 with lots of stunning games shown.
my top 10:
- ILL
- Halo remake
- God Of War Laundry
- Silent Hill Townfall
- College Football
- genAtlas
- Stellar Blade 2
- Until Dawn 2
- RE Code Veronica
- Crossfire
It's easy, then my post is not talking about you.I dont get this post. Yes its underwhelming and yes we blame a lot of it on the pursuit of 60fps which you also agree with... so whats the issue?
Trailers graphics is really good but gameplay here is really meh, I think you didn't saw thisIt's funny how you think that bad of plague while bojii thought it was the best graphic of the event
People really have different priorities when it comes to judge graphic.
wow this looks PS4 as fuckTrailers graphics is really good but gameplay here is really meh, I think you didn't saw this
Trailers graphics is really good but gameplay here is really meh, I think you didn't saw this
wow this looks PS4 as fuck
God Atreus is such an ugly and atrocious character.Here some small comparison between 2018 / ragnarok on ps5 vs faye on close settings, lightings as much as possible,
I will continue this when I have time with more pictures from faye trailer and old gow titles
Requiem blew me slap away when I first saw it, and when the game introduced the first vista. Especially after having just finished the first game, and starting Requiem immediately after, the graphical step up was jaw-dropping. Truly, the first REAL current gen showcase.Requiem was first truly current gen game (30fps on consoles even) and this one doesn't look worse. I can't agree with that.
Here some small comparison between 2018 / ragnarok on ps5 vs faye on close settings, lightings as much as possible,
I will continue this when I have time with more pictures from faye trailer and old gow titles
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Holy shit!
lmao.Nintendo is allergic to anti aliasing, its crazy they keep releasing games with such simple graphics full of jaggies
Thanks for these pictures my friend but fact faye looks hugely better, here's your direct feed pc version pictures(which is better than any ps5 version) compared to Faye ps5 youtube picturesAlright man if you're going to do this then I'm going to have to bring my own 2018/Ragnorak screenshots. Screenshots that I grabbed myself while playing each of these games on PC.
Does Laufey look better than this? Sure, I guess. In the same way Assassin's Creed Odyssey looks better than Assassin's Creed Origins, maybe.
The "jump" to Laufey from God of War 2018 is what we would've expected to see within the same generation , ala Uncharted to Uncharted 2 or Bioshock to Bioshock Infinite. Not 9 years later on next generation hardware.
Alright man if you're going to do this then I'm going to have to bring my own 2018/Ragnorak screenshots. Screenshots that I grabbed myself while playing each of these games on PC.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Does Laufey look better than this? Sure, I guess. In the same way Assassin's Creed Odyssey looks better than Assassin's Creed Origins, maybe.
The "jump" to Laufey from God of War 2018 is what we would've expected to see within the same generation , ala Uncharted to Uncharted 2 or Bioshock to Bioshock Infinite. Not 9 years later on next generation hardware.
If there's one game that makes every underwhelming game look miles better, it is FF7.
I don't want to come off as an entitled prick as they're using UE4 and maybe it will look better, but you don't show this screen. It's just ugly as fuck.
![]()
Crossfire. By ex ND and infinity wars devs.
They were playing around with nanite and realized they can have infinite geometry so they built a new traversal system to be able to traverse any kind of rocky terrain while crouched.
Gif is the shot from 1:30 seconds
Metro is. Gears was in the first gameplay trailer but its clear the whole game wont look like that. Im torn on Laufey- was expecting a little more i guess.In this thread we are salty bitches, and we need to see something really good looking to be seriously impressed. E-day, GOW, Senua and even Metro are not doing it...
I think Ragnorak has similar fidelity to 2018, but the art design was much improved. I am currently replaying. Still looks better than 95% of AAA games released todayI understand people are a bit underwhelm by GoWR as a PS5 game because of it's cross gen nature and being how similar it looks compare to PS4 version, but in reality its a technical masterpiece for PS4, like every AAA games that came out at the end of a console life cycle. SMS and GG really figured out how to push the GCN architecture to push complex geometry that we rarely see on PS4 gen and decent texture quality in a tiny ram pool.
I think Ragnorak has similar fidelity to 2018, but the art design was much improved. I am currently replaying. Still looks better than 95% of AAA games today
Let's not turn into vick. We have all seen the game. Just a few screenshots will do.Thanks for these pictures my friend but fact faye looks hugely better, here's your direct feed pc version pictures(which is better than any ps5 version) compared to Faye ps5 youtube pictures
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Lighting, environment, character models and hair all looks hugely better and considering Faye run at 60fps with those visuals I really like it.
I put few first but I have to respond to this on every pictureLet's not turn into vick. We have all seen the game. Just a few screenshots will do.
I think Ragnorak has similar fidelity to 2018, but the art design was much improved. I am currently replaying. Still looks better than 95% of AAA games released today
We are almost reaching that Wii U tech demo
![]()
What am I wrong about?Thats pure cope, bro, plenty studios make games with great visuals this gen, just platform holders(all 3, sony, ms and ninny but here coz of weak hardware) dropped the ball a lot compared to previous gen when they were among top of the top.
Game bugdets skyrocketed while quality went down and devtime increased- thats what happened with DEI infested western dev studios, i know some ppl will say colleration doesnt mean causation but there is srs pattern recognition going on
If gta6 looks mid then i will eat my words but chances are it will look top1 even if we compare gta6 ps5 footage vs most high budget AAA pr0 footage (again, not fps, iq but graphic fidelity wise), obviously series S will look like blurry mess xD