Only the 360 ones not sure about ogxbox.
for Xbone you dont get to keep anything.
Sooooo....Sony doesn't want you to get PSNow?Plus has better offering than GwG for the simple fact MS wants you to get gamepass too.
Quantity is something they can easily fix too.
Sooooo....Sony doesn't want you to get PSNow?
Explain yourself.
Games with gold is giving away Metal Gear Rising this month. That alone should make it better then PS+ to you.
I'm not so sure that's true. It's impossible to prove either way though. So I'll just leave it at that.
Question though, Microsoft trying to become the Netflix of gaming...going to all devices...is that a product of Sony as well in your opinion because they had PSNow on Samsung TVs and Sony phones and PC?
I ask because it's a similar principle.
Also, is nobody considering the possibility that Sony stopped offering PS3 and vita games because they want to include these games as PSNow offerings next gen?
This doens't really work and leans more toward wars.
The thread is talking about amount of give away games, and the 360 being more active with users, but most importantly, allowing BC with Xbox One, are amng the primary reasons Xbox is still giving away a larger number of games. with PS3 basically dead, Vita being dead in the west for like 3 years, and no BC, Sony really can't do more than two unless they want to give away 4 PS4 games which is a bit silly.
I mean they COULD do that but it's clear they don't want to. Even MS doesn't give away 4 Xbox One games they have the 360 take up the other slot, or the original Xbox.
Which is yet another way Microsoft has the superior program. The BC games they give away with Gold are permanently tied to your account, and can be played even if your subscription lapses.
I think they're taking their sweet time. Few countries have this service and they don't have any insane promo like MS usually do for people to know gamepass.
Anyway, Gamepass is a better service than psnow imo
So you are telling me that Metal Gear Rising is better than Bloodborne ?
To the user I was replying to it might be. I don’t know his tastes, and not everyone is a fan of the soulsborne games.So you are telling me that Metal Gear Rising is better than Bloodborne ?
Well, "better" is a pretty subjective term. Both games cost $19.99 digitally so the value proposition between the two is equal.
To the user I was replying to it might be. I don’t know his tastes, and not everyone is a fan of the soulsborne games.
On it's face, yes...but Metal Gear Rising is a game from last gen. The fact that it's still 19.99 should be taken into consideration. Not saying it's a better game. Matter of fact, I pretty much would have to doubt that it is. However, the value proposition is different. I think, for the time it became available, Bloodborne was the better deal because of the time between its original release and it's availability on PS+.
Yea I don't think it's so much about the sales as I believe they want to increase the value of what they would offer on PSNow for next gen.
There is also one other explanation but it's a super longshot. They figured out BC and are going to start offering games for PS3 and Vita for purchase...but even then, you can buy PS3 games and vita games on PS4 now can't you? I've never actually bought a ps3 game on my PS4 and I don't own a Vita so I actually don't know how this works. Do you buy it and then have to plug in your PS3 to play it?
I agree with you there, but another thing to consider is that Metal Gear Rising is free this month and you get to keep it forever. Your ongoing costs to access the content are $0, but your ongoing costs to continue to access Bloodborne is the price of your Plus subscription ($5 a month or whatever it works out to).
Hold up...to be clear, I'm asking how is Sony giving a better offering due to Microsoft wanting people to sign up to Gamepass. I don't understand the basis of your logic when you say this. How do GWG and Gamepass this relate?
And what does it matter if Gamepass is the better service? I'm lost.
Both quite subjective and not something I can really ageee with honestly, especially the “arrogant Sony” meme like one.Yeah, Sony is arrogant and is objectively behind on services and value offered at this point.
Well, it is a bit of a meme at this point. But they are objectively taking away content and not lowering any prices to compensate. The mindset is, "they will buy it anyway."Both quite subjective and not something I can really ageee with honestly, especially the “arrogant Sony” meme like one.
Ahhhhh ok I see where you're coming from now. Maybe...but I would think to have a game offered on game pass would be a significantly bigger deal that to offer it on GWG. So I think they would pick and choose which games go where. But I see your point and lack the knowledge to really be able to tell if thats the case or not. I mean Metal Gear Rising is a pretty good game. That's just one example though.quality of the titles offered on GwG is worse thanks to GS. you are free to disagree.
Well, it is a bit of a meme at this point. But they are objectively taking away content and not lowering any prices to compensate. The mindset is, "they will buy it anyway."
What else do I call that?
(I might be wrong, but I do not think the PSN+ prices have varied much in the last few years despite them offering tons of content).
The price of PS+ in the US rose from $50 a year to $60 a year in September of 2016, so about two and a half years ago. That has been the only price increase here since the service began in 2010. Other areas worldwide have had similar increases, notably Europe in late 2017 (just a few months before they announced they would be dropping PS3 and Vita games from PS+).
So it's easy to see why people, especially those gamers in Europe, would see this as less value for more cost.
The price of PS+ in the US rose from $50 a year to $60 a year in September of 2016, so about two and a half years ago. That has been the only price increase here since the service began in 2010. Other areas worldwide have had similar increases, notably Europe in late 2017 (just a few months before they announced they would be dropping PS3 and Vita games from PS+).
So it's easy to see why people, especially those gamers in Europe, would see this as less value for more cost.
You don't wanna have this discussion with me, you will lose every time.
2 X 0 = 0
Sony doesn't give their games away they just let you borrow them as long as you have PS+.
As do I. Care to enlighten the rest of us? I have some thoughts, but I would love to hear yours first.Lol I wonder why MS is giving twice the games...