• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Jeffrey Epstein Advisors Helped Push Microtransactions In Call Of Duty

Nobody knows the true extent of exactly what happened, and exaggerations and crazy theories are inevitable.

But it doesn't take a rocket scientist to discern that very, very bad things happened regardless. No sane person is losing sleep over depicting Epstein too harshly.
Correct, no sleep lost over any of this for the sake of Epstein.
That doesn't mean it's not worthwhile to point out the chronic inaccuracy and lack of interest in being accurate in this case. Not because of Epstein, he's dead. It's the shit that the memetic virus is spreading.

By the way. 14 years old
I'm not responsible for what one of the few actually adjudicated victims says about herself of Virginia Giuffre. You can preen about this all you like, you're just embarrassing yourself.
 
Last edited:
What's next? He was the visionary director on Saints row remake? 🧐
Mermaid Man And Barnacle Boy Superhero GIF by SpongeBob SquarePants
 
Correct, no sleep lost over any of this for the sake of Epstein.
That doesn't mean it's not worthwhile to point out the chronic inaccuracy and lack of interest in being accurate in this case. Not because of Epstein, he's dead. It's the shit that the memetic virus is spreading.


I'm not responsible for what one of the few actually adjudicated victims says about herself of Virginia Giuffre. You can preen about this all you like, you're just embarrassing yourself.

I'm not the one embarrassing myself here. Your response appears to subtly suggest that the reason you won't lose sleep over Epstein isn't because he's responsible for serious wrongdoing, it's because he's dead already.

"Says about herself of Virginia Giuffre" what does that even mean? Your posts are full of this awkward language struggling to exonerate Epstein not from obvious hyperbole (like a bank account named Baal) but from culpability in general.

Can you make a simple statement, without qualifiers or explanations, that Epstein committed serious wrongdoing? Nothing more nothing less?
 
I'm not the one embarrassing myself here. Your response appears to subtly suggest that the reason you won't lose sleep over Epstein isn't because he's responsible for serious wrongdoing, it's because he's dead already.

"Says about herself of Virginia Giuffre" what does that even mean? Your posts are full of this awkward language struggling to exonerate Epstein not from obvious hyperbole (like a bank account named Baal) but from culpability in general.

Can you make a simple statement, without qualifiers or explanations, that Epstein committed serious wrongdoing? Nothing more nothing less?
I meant "says about herself or Virginia Giuffre". Simple typo.

There's nothing awkward about my verbiage. What might be "awkward" for people like you is coming into contact with facts that undermine the maximalist version of the story after years of buying into it.

Epstein's culpability as adjudicated and alleged is available to anyone who wants it. He did commit significant wrongdoing.

Though that you demand MeeToo-ish mantra out of me "without explanation" after wholesale ignoring rigorous, sourced information and incessantly spamming your one liner absurd. That's why you embarrass yourself.
 
I meant "says about herself or Virginia Giuffre". Simple typo.

There's nothing awkward about my verbiage. What might be "awkward" for people like you is coming into contact with facts that undermine the maximalist version of the story after years of buying into it.

Epstein's culpability as adjudicated and alleged is available to anyone who wants it. He did commit significant wrongdoing.

Though that you demand MeeToo-ish mantra out of me "without explanation" after wholesale ignoring rigorous, sourced information and incessantly spamming your one liner absurd. That's why you embarrass yourself.

If there really is significant wrongdoing, there's nothing "metooish" about asserting it.

I asked if you could state he committed wrongdoing without any qualifiers, just to break things down to something fundamental we can agree on. But you still couldn't help yourself but to wrap it with "as adjudicated and alleged" right before and dropping "me too" after, as if you shouldn't have to lower yourself to such conduct.

By the way the DOJ previously indicated they had 6 million files and now say they are done and fulfilled their obligation at 3.5m released. The remaining half of files probably do not support crazy conspiracy theories, but it's silly to assume they don't support anything. I don't think the right response is "nothing to see here, move along" just because a "maximalist version" of the story exists.
 
Top Bottom