entremet
Member
https://medium.com/@oscarboyson/the-future-of-cities-ba4e26c807fe#.nu396jeza
It's only 18 minutes.
Only 18 minutes, but urban life is going to be a huge part of the future. Love or hate it.
Some stats, (cribbed from Kottke.org)
I'm surprised we rarely talk about the cost of roads and such in terms of national deficit. I know they're essential, but it seems we're subsidizing the wrong things, both from an economical and environmental perspective.
I long for Japanese style bullet trains across the US and more public transportation in bigger cities a la New York.
It's only 18 minutes.
What does “the future of cities” mean? To much of the developing world, it might be as simple as aspiring to having your own toilet, rather than sharing one with over 100 people. To a family in Detroit, it could mean having non-toxic drinking water. For planners and mayors, it’s about a lot of things — sustainability, economy, inclusivity, and resilience. Most of us can hope we can spend a little less time on our commutes to work and a little more time with our families. For a rich white dude up in a 50th floor penthouse, “the future of cities” might mean zipping around in a flying car while a robot jerks you off and a drone delivers your pizza. For many companies, the future of cities is simply about business and money, presented to us as buzzwords like “smart city” and “the city of tomorrow.”
I started shooting the “The Future of a Cities” as a collaboration with the The Nantucket Project, but it really took shape when hundreds of people around the world responded to a scrappy video I made asking for help.
Only 18 minutes, but urban life is going to be a huge part of the future. Love or hate it.
Some stats, (cribbed from Kottke.org)
- An estimated 70% of the world’s population will live in urban areas by 2050. (It’s currently 54%.)
- Buying a Toyota Corolla in Singapore costs $140,000.
- In 2012, 52% of the cost of US highways and roads was paid by general tax revenue rather than by drivers (through gax tax and tolls). In 1972, it was only 30%, which means car usage is much more heavily subsidized than it used to be.
- When you buy a car in Denmark, you pay a 150% tax, even if it’s electric.
- And a relevant quote from Jane Jacobs’ The Death and Life of Great American Cities: “Lowly, unpurposeful, and random as they may appear, sidewalk contacts are the small change from which a city’s wealth of public life may grow.”
I'm surprised we rarely talk about the cost of roads and such in terms of national deficit. I know they're essential, but it seems we're subsidizing the wrong things, both from an economical and environmental perspective.
I long for Japanese style bullet trains across the US and more public transportation in bigger cities a la New York.