• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

WaPo: White House worked secretly to delay Syria sanctions bill

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kolx

Member
The White House worked behind the scenes last week to prevent a bipartisan bill to sanction the Assad regime for war crimes and atrocities against civilians from getting a vote in the House of Representatives. The Democratic leadership bowed to White House pressure and withdrew its support for voting on the bill for now.

Lawmakers and congressional staff had been preparing to bring up the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act this week and pass it out of the House with relative ease. The bill, named after a Syrian defector who presented the world with 55,000 pictures documenting Assad’s mass torture and murder of civilians in custody, has more than 50 co-sponsors, a majority of whom are Democrats.

Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), the ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, was the primary author of the bill, along with his committee counterpart Ed Royce (R-Calif.). Even liberal Democrats like Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) had signed on. But late Friday afternoon, just before the legislative calendar for the following week was to be released, White House legislative affairs staffers began calling leadership in both parties urging them to shelve the legislation.

The office of House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) told me that the White House pressured House Democratic leadership to pull their support for moving the bill, and Democrats obliged.

“After President Obama’s disastrous handling of Syria, he’s now adding insult to injury by pressuring House Democrats to kill a bipartisan bill aimed at cleaning up his mess,” said Ryan’s press secretary, AshLee Strong. “We hope members will have a chance to vote on this important legislation soon.”

The bill would impose new sanctions on the Assad regime and its supporters, spur investigations meant to fuel the prosecution of war crimes in Syria, and encourage a process to find a negotiated solution to the crisis. Specifically, it would require the president to impose new sanctions on any entity that does business with or finances the Syrian government or its military or intelligence services, which includes Russia and Iran. It would also require sanctions on any entity that does business with several Syrian government-controlled industries, including the airline, telecommunications and energy sectors.

White House worked secretly to delay Syria sanctions bill

More at the link.
 
IIRC, the executive branch doesn't like the Legislative branch interfering with diplomatic issues like this. Regan objective to stuff against the contras back in the day as well, iirc.
 

Rur0ni

Member
Specifically, it would require the president to impose new sanctions on any entity that does business with or finances the Syrian government or its military or intelligence services, which includes Russia and Iran. It would also require sanctions on any entity that does business with several Syrian government-controlled industries, including the airline, telecommunications and energy sectors.
So, not surprising?
 
it would require the president to impose new sanctions on any entity that does business with or finances the Syrian government or its military or intelligence services, which includes Russia and Iran.

This is the important part. Looks like a roundabout way to get back the Iranian sanctions from the nuclear deal. While it is a noble gesture this is the tail wagging the dog.
 
Presumably the White House believed that such sanctions would be counter-productive to a peace deal in Syria, particularly during last week's ceasefire.

They were already working on a peace deal. It didn't work out in the end but they didn't want to complicate things further. It was also clearly not only about Syria.

Makes it more difficult to find a diplomatic solution with Russia.

It's like having a focus group diffuse a bomb.

thanks for the responses.
but seeing as the cease-fire is pretty much in tatters now with the Un convoy bombing, what's the next move? I can appreciate wanting to preserve the Iranian nuclear deal in place by not hitting them with sanctions indirectly this just does not look good in the eyes of the world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom