yeah stutters aside of course. It stuttered a lot on release. buddy just got a 4080 back then so we did a lot of testing.
Why would anybody care? It's just an opinion about how those frames don't contribute to lower latency like they did in the past. One that can be countered with anybody elses opinion by simply saying "I don't mind the added latency because it improves fluidity" but instead I feel the people who are doing the "I am better than you" are those who try to drag in console comparisons that nobody was making. He may have the same opinion about framegen when it hits console soon enough.Just why do he care? DLSS3 is used by a lot of people and most of them are happy with the added frames. And the added latency IS NOT PERCEPTIBLE. For real I would love to get some people here on my rig and ask them were it's with DLSS3 + FG and were it's not. I'm sure none of those "expert" could tell the difference. Butrofif needs to act like an ass and take everyone from his high horse, complaining about added latency when it is even WORSE on consoles. Just why? Let people play on whatever they want with the quality they want, no needs to act like 'I know, and I am, better than any of you". If someone if happy with + 10ms with also + 70FPS on his game, good for him! He wont FEEL the difference on latency, but he will SEE the fluidity.
So yeah, he searched for it and now he is playing the victim "everyone is mean with me"
That's not it, like I said I hope you have the time of your life with your PS5! We just don't understand why you tolerate the latency on consoles at sub 30/60 FPS but can't stand the small added latency by DLSS3 FG (that you don't use, btw).
Everyone dude, everyone can respond to the thread. You're so haughty, it's unbelievable
And yet it's coming, and YOU'LL LOVE IT!
And you act like FG is adding more latency in a game than it's console counterpart while the console version will always be worse.
What's the point of this? No one is saying THEY NEED 170+ fps dude. People are just happy with how it run. I do prefer to play at 4K/120 than 1080p/30 but you do you. Btw I finished GoT on my PS4 Pro, I bought it 4 days after the release:
Playing on consoles is terrible with input latency, frametimes, resolution and framerate inconsistencies. How can you even play like this.
Omagad I don't know how it needs to be said but: he is complaining about latency with FG while it's WORSE ON CONSOLES. I hope it's big enough. How does that make sense?
exactly. I don't want FG on console at all. I am not envious about it contrary to what people would say. if I was, I would just get a 4080 tomorrow on monday. What's the big deal being envious if I have money not to be?! I have my choices and that's it.
u ok bro?That's not it, like I said I hope you have the time of your life with your PS5! We just don't understand why you tolerate the latency on consoles at sub 30/60 FPS but can't stand the small added latency by DLSS3 FG (that you don't use, btw).
Everyone dude, everyone can respond to the thread. You're so haughty, it's unbelievable
And yet it's coming, and YOU'LL LOVE IT!
And you act like FG is adding more latency in a game than it's console counterpart while the console version will always be worse.
What's the point of this? No one is saying THEY NEED 170+ fps dude. People are just happy with how it run. I do prefer to play at 4K/120 than 1080p/30 but you do you. Btw I finished GoT on my PS4 Pro, I bought it 4 days after the release:
Playing on consoles is terrible with input latency, frametimes, resolution and framerate inconsistencies. How can you even play like this.
See how it is a stupid comment?
Omagad I don't know how it needs to be said but: he is complaining about latency with FG while it's WORSE ON CONSOLES. I hope it's big enough. How does that make sense?
It's not improved visually. ps5 version was 4k60.
It's tiring to repeat the same thing over and over (3 times) so you finally understand. It took time.
Yeah, it's fine, good for you/them. But don't act like you are the better person, nor you know better than everyone (you don't, I'm telling you).
I'm not sure how it needs to be said but he isn't complaining about the absolute latency at all which is where this "I'm better than you" becomes absurd. It's like me complaining that the stated HDD capacity doesn't match what you get on the actual drive in Windows and then somebody saying "yeah but you often use a 256GB drive why are you complaining". He doesn't like framegen measurements of fps because it becomes misleading to measuring performance/latency and dislikes that it makes it worse in reality.
I repeat. I will play on console even if every future game is 30fps. It doesn't matter to me. Comparison to console is irrelevant!
If you think 30fps is fine then why do you think motion blur is a good thing?? Sounds like you want the fluidity from a higher framerate. I assume you just don’t want the visual loss from scaling down graphics on hardware not powerful enough to reach a higher framerate.
I completely agree. I played both the ps4 and ps5 versions of this game and it looks and plays incredibly on PC. Makes me wonder what a sequel with ray tracing on PC could look like.
yes I know that.
Ps5 version is checkerboarded 4k. PC has much better IQ with DLAA
PC version supports higher frame rates.
He totally is complaining about FG and latency:
I think it's totally relevant when you said that FG adds latency and we should not use it while on the same time you are playing at sub 30 FPS on burry 4K with horrendous latency.
true. dlss and dlaa are benefits. I never said it aint
relative. not absolute.
Not just those, I’m talking about quality settings.
Even ultra seems similar/same as ps5.
Yes, he's complaining about using fps measurements that aren't native and introduce lag. NOT THAT it is lower than console or that he can't put up with less. Imagine console had a framegen option and he did the same and you'll understand.
I will reiterate it again: this game is one of the best open worlds experiences I have played so far overall. Glad to have double dipped on the PS4/PS5 and Steam Deck for this; such a great game on the go.
The beauty of PC is that people can play at whatever settings they prefer.
Motion blur is crap. It’s the first thing I deactivate. For me it does nothing except making the image blurrier and kills all attempt to push up visuals and resolution, I still see the same framerate stutter, just with blurry frames. Worthless tech imo.
What's not apples to apples about it? Its almost identical. It's both a measurement purist disliking something that fools people into thinking the measurement is higher than it actually is with a disliked tradeoff.
Frame gen on a 3080??? Without mod=bullshit.
I love how minimal the hud is. Also I like how smooth the controls and environmental interactions are. Rebirth could've learned more from this game.I will reiterate it again: this game is one of the best open worlds experiences I have played so far overall. Glad to have double dipped on the PS4/PS5 and Steam Deck for this; such a great game on the go.
Don't think there's much difference in image quality - as in textures etc. Might be some improved AO and shadows but thats about it. And DLAA maybe a bit sharper/smoother than the inhouse TAA solution in lower res - sub 4K.
read other post. Friend got a 4080 around hogwarts legacy release.
Hogwarts was a piece of shit port at release and still kinda is. Don’t base your opinion of FG on this game.
You need help. Preferably professional help.
calls 45 fps to 90 fps frame generation UNPLAYABLE5-0 for me. Game. Set. Match.
