Yautja_Warrior
Member
How does the 980Ti compare to the 1080 or 1070?
980 Ti is close to a 1070 but a 1080 has a fair bit more power, nothing mind blowing though, all 3 are solid GPU's.
How does the 980Ti compare to the 1080 or 1070?
I really don't get that line of thinking, maybe embellish a bit.
If I upgrade from a dogshit CPU to a new i7 on my PC, the performance doesn't go to waste. Why would make it a waste on console?
Because the games are being built around Xbox One/PS4 specs as the base & using a new CPU would mostly be wasted resources. even if it's a CPU that's powerful enough to allow 30fps games to be played at 60fps that will be mostly wasted when the games are already targeting 60fps. but that was me just thinking about the normal games I forgot about the fact that Scorpio will also be for VR games so maybe it will be worth it for MS to go with a new CPU.
At E3 Phil Spencer said concerning the Scorpio, ”When we started looking at Scorpio," he says, ”we asked the partners, ‘in order to build a true high-fidelity 4K game, what capabilities do you need?' That's what we designed Scorpio around. It's kind of like a [GeForce GTX] 980 card on the PC. I get the capability that I need as a developer to deliver a high-fidelity 4K game."
The 980ti is about 25% more powerful than a 980 on average from what I've seen. I'm all for powerful hardware, but let's remember loss-leading is a thing of the past. Although, I have a RX480, and it seems strange to me that they'd be running Polaris at 1300MHz+ in a console form-factor while Sony had to downclock to 911MHz.
https://forum.beyond3d.com/posts/1944136/. This is the link to the quote in question.
https://forum.beyond3d.com/posts/1944136/. This is the link to the quote in question.
Link? I'd like to read that.
Actually, sebbbi on B3D (he is a dev) speculates that the gpu in Scorpio should perform to the equivalent of 980Ti.
I'm more in line with this post https://forum.beyond3d.com/posts/1944183/
I just don't see how Vega could be that much more efficient than Polaris
Same with a 6TF Polaris GPU matching a 980 Ti, don't see how that's possible
980 Ti performance in a console would rock though
Back in August, our pal David Kanter discovered one of the important ingredients of the secret sauce that is NVIDIAs efficiency optimizations. As it turns out, NVIDIA has been doing tile based rasterization and binning since Maxwell, and that this was likely one of the big reasons Maxwells efficiency increased by so much. Though NVIDIA still refuses to comment on the matter, from what we can ascertain, breaking up a scene into tiles has allowed NVIDIA to keep a lot more traffic on-chip, which saves memory bandwidth, but also cuts down on very expensive accesses to VRAM.
For Vega, AMD will be doing something similar. The architecture will add support for what AMD calls the Draw Stream Binning Rasterizer, which true to its name, will give Vega the ability to bin polygons by tile. By doing so, AMD will cut down on the amount of memory accesses by working with smaller tiles that can stay-on chip. This will also allow AMD to do a better job of culling hidden pixels, keeping them from making it to the pixel shaders and consuming resources there.
As we have almost no detail on how AMD or NVIDIA are doing tiling and binning, its impossible to say with any degree of certainty just how close their implementations are, so Ill refrain from any speculation on which might be better. But Im not going to be too surprised if in the future we find out both implementations are quite similar. The important thing to take away from this right now is that AMD is following a very similar path to where we think NVIDIA captured some of their greatest efficiency gains on Maxwell, and that in turn bodes well for Vega.
I'm more in line with this post https://forum.beyond3d.com/posts/1944183/
I just don't see how Vega could be that much more efficient than Polaris
Same with a 6TF Polaris GPU matching a 980 Ti, don't see how that's possible
980 Ti performance in a console would rock though
The 980ti is roughly 40% more powerful than a rx480. No way Polaris gets to that level.
A 1300MHz Polaris gpu with increased mem bandwidth and vram is more in line with the 980 performance Phil Mentioned.
At standard boost speed of 1266MHz Polaris is 5.8TFLOPS. MS stated Scorpio is 6TFLOPS, this could include a Jag CPU, or mean mean Polaris at 1300MHz(5.99TFLOPS).I am not exactly sure why some keep equating the rx480 with a 6tf gpu. For one thing the rx480 is a 5.5tf gpu, for another it only has 32rops while Scorpio will almost assuredly have 64rops , and bandwidth of around 224gb/s compared to 320gb/s. They are not really comparable.
I am not exactly sure why some keep equating the rx480 with a 6tf gpu. For one thing the rx480 is a 5.5tf gpu, for another it only has 32rops while Scorpio will almost assuredly have 64rops , and bandwidth of around 224gb/s compared to 320gb/s. They are not really comparable.
At standard boost speed of 1266MHz Polaris is 5.8TFLOPS. MS stated Scorpio is 6TFLOPS, this could include a Jag CPU, or mean mean Polaris at 1300MHz(5.99TFLOPS).
Not to rain on anybody's parade, but this could be a PS4Pro running Polaris at stock speeds with some memory optimizations and more VRAM.
Coming from the "avatar-like graphics" of the Xbox One, I'm not so fast to assume full Vega/Zen array. That would be great, but nothing is guaranteed.
Any 480 that works as intended is almost 6tf. Most custom 480s run at 1300mhz+ and are 6 tflops. More rops is irrelevant for performance when we know the tflops. If Scorpio uses Polaris and is 6Tflops it won't ever match a 980 TI.
Any 480 that works as intended is almost 6tf. Most custom 480s run at 1300mhz+ and are 6 tflops. More rops is irrelevant for performance when we know the tflops. If Scorpio uses Polaris and is 6Tflops it won't ever match a 980 TI.
I'm kinda like "no sh!t" to most of what you say. What's your point? I mentioned specifically that I have a RX 480 and that I have doubts of them running Polaris at 1300MHz to achieve their 6tf.I have no interest in the debate of zen or no zen, and You mentioned boost clock, its standard closk and boost clock are not the same thing. Also consoles are not desktop parts, so for one thing, they are not going to take the rx480 and stick it in a console. The gpu in the PS4P, despite similarities to the rx480 does not make it the same.The fact that they have the same amount of CUs is by the way. MS will most definitely not use the same gpu only clocked so high. Its a console and therefore heat dissipation and power management are going to be the dictating factors in the size of the gpu.
This could be a turd.
I'm kinda like "no sh!t" to most of what you say. What's your point? I mentioned specifically that I have a RX 480 and that I have doubts of them running Polaris at 1300MHz to achieve their 6tf.
My comments have been aimed at the idea it will match a 980ti. Also, reminding that a standard rx480 is 5.8tf, AiB boost is commonly 1330MHz. 5.8tf+OC Jag CPU is 6tf. Any Vega enhancements could be limited to memory configuration.
This could be a turd.
Actually rops are most assuredly an important performance metric. Why don't you stick a 16rops to a 4tf card and target 4k, let see what happens. The rx480 is handicapped to some extent by the decision to pair it up with 32rops instead of 64. Check the reviews of the 480 at 4k and see how it performs relative to the 390x.
Already implented in Xbox One with it's "dual layer gpu" and "Avatar-like graphics".I'd been hearing about turd power for years, thought it was all theoretical up till now. Will be interesting to see how it works out.
I am not exactly sure why some keep equating the rx480 with a 6tf gpu. For one thing the rx480 is a 5.5tf gpu, for another it only has 32rops while Scorpio will almost assuredly have 64rops , and bandwidth of around 224gb/s compared to 320gb/s. They are not really comparable.
Already implented in Xbox One with it's "dual layer gpu" and "Avatar-like graphics".
I'm kinda like "no sh!t" to most of what you say. What's your point? I mentioned specifically that I have a RX 480 and that I have doubts of them running Polaris at 1300MHz to achieve their 6tf.
My comments have been aimed at the idea it will match a 980ti. Also, reminding that a standard rx480 is 5.8tf, AiB boost is commonly 1330MHz. 5.8tf+OC Jag CPU is 6tf. Any Vega enhancements could be limited to memory configuration.
This could be a turd.
Any 480 that works as intended is almost 6tf. Most custom 480s run at 1300mhz+ and are 6 tflops. More rops is irrelevant for performance when we know the tflops. If Scorpio uses Polaris and is 6Tflops it won't ever match a 980 TI.
Why are we comparing a console APU to a 980Ti already? This comparison makes so little sense that the next one is to compare Scorpio to sliced bread. For starters, it'll soon be a year since 980Ti went off production and it'll be 1,5 years of that by the time of Scorpio's launch.
I believe it will be Vega. In response to the idea that it could be as powerful as a 980ti I was simply saying that it could be Polaris with superior memory bandwidth.If you're expecting Polaris, you're setting yourself up for disappointment. Raise your expectations.
How many levels in depth of concern trolling is this thread in.
I believe it will be Vega. In response to the idea that it could be as powerful as a 980ti I was simply saying that it could be Polaris with superior memory bandwidth.
Go back and read. I say that it would be strange that ms would use a Polaris at 1300MHz, but later theorized it could be 1266MHz core paired with a jag for their 6tf.
Remember the Switch Pascal hope thread? MS has bungled hardware before, right? $100 more for 30-40% less power.
---
Phil said it's like GTX 980, not the 25% more powerful 980ti.
My point was that we shouldn't make random predictions that the Scorpio will be 25% more powerful than Phil Spencer said.MS has bungled hardware before? What's your point? So we should make random predictions that have no evidence so we can fit into a vague narrative based on one (maybe two to be generous) perceived mistakes that are being conflated to support the idea of MS being generally incompetent
I believe it will be Vega. In response to the idea that it could be as powerful as a 980ti I was simply saying that it could be Polaris with superior memory bandwidth.
Go back and read. I say that it would be strange that ms would use a Polaris at 1300MHz, but later theorized it could be 1266MHz core paired with a jag for their 6tf.
Remember the Switch Pascal hope thread? MS has bungled hardware before, right? $100 more for 30-40% less power.
---
Phil said it's like GTX 980, not the 25% more powerful 980ti.
My point was that we shouldn't make random predictions that the Scorpio will be 25% more powerful than Phil Spencer said.
I believe it will be Vega. Just reminding people to temper expectations.
980ti still a beast.
Sorry for long text but someone posted this on a website. Could be bogus but who knows.
FUCKS SAKE GUYS THIS JAGUAR TALK IS NONSENSE OK ITS ALREADY BEEN GUARANTEED JAGUAR IS OFF THE TABLE AS XBOX SCORPIO IS USING ZEN PERIOD.....
Sure, I understand where they're coming from. I can show you quotes from around *edit* Sept. when I said it would feature Zen/Vega, and that PS4Pro was using 2016 tech and Scorpio will be using 2017 tech.I get what you're saying, nobody knows what is going to be in this thing, and sure it could be underwhelming to some if they're expecting GTX 980 TI level performance as it's possible that won't be the case. However, the people you've been criticizing are using scientific reasoning to make their predictions while you seem to be stuck on some vague quotes. You don't see the difference?
http://wccftech.com/xbox-scorpio-amd-ryzen-vega/All caps? "a website"? No link.
Seems legit.
Sorry for long text but someone posted this on a website. Could be bogus but who knows.
FUCKS SAKE GUYS THIS JAGUAR TALK IS NONSENSE OK ITS ALREADY BEEN GUARANTEED JAGUAR IS OFF THE TABLE AS XBOX SCORPIO IS USING ZEN PERIOD.....
SR5 RYZEN CPU @ 2.8ghz 8 cores 8 threads
AMD VEGA CUSTOM GPU @ 977 MHZ 6.2 teraflops, 12gb GDDR5x RAM 320gb per second bandwidth, WILL RUN ALL GAMES AT PC ULTRA QUALITY EQUIVALENT NATIVE 4K 60fps period.........