rc213 said:Good lord those Kat Dennings pics on egotastic are boobtastic!
Yeah good day for celeb nudity. Post-preggers Alba isn't ideal, but you take what you can get.
rc213 said:Good lord those Kat Dennings pics on egotastic are boobtastic!
LongDongJunon said:Oh Dear
Ashhong said:I WANT MORE
it already did before and justice wonOozer3993 said:I was waiting for that picture to find its way here :lol]
seattle6418 said:I´m so glad i stop by this thread:lol
Victoria Justice is my new high school goddess.
Also, 14 and up is good here.
Damn you americans and your "18" tea party restrictions.
I mean, a girl that 15-16 most of the times is already hot. People forget that girls used to get married at the ages of 13-14 back in the 1900´s?
Justice needs to do some crazy porno leaked video. We have to see this.
...14 and up? I'm sorry. Not only is that creepy ... that's terrible.seattle6418 said:I´m so glad i stop by this thread:lol
Victoria Justice is my new high school goddess.
Also, 14 and up is good here.
Damn you americans and your "18" tea party restrictions.
I mean, a girl that 15-16 most of the times is already hot. People forget that girls used to get married at the ages of 13-14 back in the 1900´s?
Justice needs to do some crazy porno leaked video. We have to see this.
Salazar said:a) I don't care what's legal wherever the fuck you are from.
b) No, people didn't forget. People got civilized, unlike you, motherfucker.
I NEED SCISSORS said:Americuh, fuck yeah.
fudgey_lumpkins said:Can we kill the ethnocentrism please? Thanks.
Whoah. I understand your reasonings but don't you think that's a little too harsh?Salazar said:Nope. Fuck it. Countries with reasonable restrictions are ethically superior to countries without.
fudgey_lumpkins said:Can we kill the ethnocentrism please? Thanks.
You live in the Land of the Culo, also known as Brazil, where wild Adriana Lima's roam the beaches. Stop giving out juice boxes and go catch them Lima's.seattle6418 said:I´m so glad i stop by this thread:lol
Victoria Justice is my new high school goddess.
Also, 14 and up is good here.
Damn you americans and your "18" tea party restrictions.
I mean, a girl that 15-16 most of the times is already hot. People forget that girls used to get married at the ages of 13-14 back in the 1900´s?
Justice needs to do some crazy porno leaked video. We have to see this.
spindashing said:Whoah. I understand your reasonings but don't you think that's a little too harsh?
fudgey_lumpkins said:Can we kill the ethnocentrism please? Thanks.
Shanadeus said:Holy shit at you people :lol
And while an aoc of 14 is a bit a on the low side it's just one-two years from the commonly accepted age limit in most civilized countries.
Oozer3993 said:I was waiting for that picture to find its way here :lol She's appearing in Keri Hilson's next music video as a bounty hunter and that's her costume. That video can't come out soon enough
On a related note, here's JoJo's last music video.
P.S. Since you asked for more:
What gives you the right to decide what's civilized in every country? I can guarantee that a 14 year old chick where he is from is more mature than a 20 year old in America.Salazar said:a) I don't care what's legal wherever the fuck you are from.
b) No, people didn't forget. People got civilized, unlike you, motherfucker.
Darknessbear said:What gives you the right to decide what's civilized in every country?
Darknessbear said:I can guarantee that a 14 year old chick where he is from is more mature than a 20 year old in America.
Darknessbear said:What's with all the judgmental pricks here? It's alright to be attracted to an underage girl, just (depending on your region) keep those feelings in check or you're going to go to jail. Does not mean you are wrong, it's just the law. I'm sure if they raised the age to 20 - you'd still be attracted to 19 year olds.
Realistically in most of the world over 18 is not the norm:Salazar said:The post was '14 and up is good here', followed by some risible crap about how you used to be able to marry very young girls. Of course, those girls typically didn't have a say in the matter, which adds idiocy to the offensiveness of the remark. I thought the post was conspicuously creepy and out of line, even for this thread.
It's just always been a pet peeve of mine when another judges someones sexual preference or what someone finds attractive in a chick. Difference in sexual attraction keeps us from all liking the same chicks and provides balance.StuBurns said:I think this is a touchy subject, and really it's more a case of natural instinct than anything else. Some of the girls in this thread, as old as twenty still look very child like to me, there is an aversion to the idea of them sexually, where as with Justice, she is only seventeen and I think she looks adult and attractive in a sexual manner.
The legal ages are not there to convict people who sleep with a girl a few days under 18, they're there to protect children. Some girls are still children at 18, some are still children at 20 but the line has to be drawn somewhere.
We should go easy on calling each other perverts and pedophiles, although I don't think anyone has been seriously offended in the thread, if you're going in a thread with this title, you know what you're getting.
Darknessbear said:It's just always been a pet peeve of mine when another judges someones sexual preference
Darknessbear said:It's just always been a pet peeve of mine when another judges someones sexual preference or what someone finds attractive in a chick. Difference in sexual attraction keeps us from all liking the same chicks and provides balance.
Protect children? So if they are of legal age, but look younger than we should protect them?The Shadow said:StuBurns is on the money. It's one thing if they're 16-17 but look like they're sexually mature. It's completely different if your "preference" is for those who clearly look like they are pre-pubescent. It's not about opinion at that point, it's about sexual dysfunction.
The legal line has to be drawn in order to protect those who are still in fact children, irregardless if others mature before that legal line.
Salazar said:If someone's sexual preference is reducible to the low age of the male or female involved, then I am entirely secure in judging them.
Darknessbear said:Protect children? So if they are of legal age, but look younger than we should protect them?
Darknessbear said:And we were discussing the guy who's countries legal age is 14. So we still persecute him in that case - because we feel it's wrong? I don't see your guys logic. And I feel you guys are missing the line between attraction and action.
Darknessbear said:Why not go into the weed thread and berate those people for partaking in a illegal substance in America? Is this about legality or your morality?
Exactly my point, his statement made no sense.Salazar said:I don't even know how you typed this without your hands rebelling against its arrant nonsensicality.
Calling him a "motherfucker" is far from just stating it's creepiness. But, reading his post again it does come off creepy - but again it's his country, who cares.I'm not persecuting him in any strong sense of the word, and a strong sense is pretty much the only one persecution has. Just calling a creepy post what it is.
Lebron said:
sweetvar26 said:What the fuck is Bieber doing in that picture?
Please don't tell me that they are dating.
Kim Kardashian. Going all pedo.Ashhong said:Who is that girl in the photo anyway? I cant tell..
them childbearing hipsOozer3993 said:
I NEED SCISSORS said:I already came. Get with the times.
:lolTOM f'N CRUISE said:them childbearing hips
:{)Iadien said:
Oozer3993 said:
Oozer3993 said:
Dead said:Rob Liefelds art IS anatomically correct after all!