• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

This thread is officially really creepy looking now

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh Dear
jojo-cleavage-twitpics.jpg


scrubs-payback-o.gif
 
I´m so glad i stop by this thread:lol

Victoria Justice is my new high school goddess.

Also, 14 and up is good here.

Damn you americans and your "18" tea party restrictions.

I mean, a girl that 15-16 most of the times is already hot. People forget that girls used to get married at the ages of 13-14 back in the 1900´s?

Justice needs to do some crazy porno leaked video. We have to see this.
 

Salazar

Member
seattle6418 said:
I´m so glad i stop by this thread:lol

Victoria Justice is my new high school goddess.

Also, 14 and up is good here.

Damn you americans and your "18" tea party restrictions.

I mean, a girl that 15-16 most of the times is already hot. People forget that girls used to get married at the ages of 13-14 back in the 1900´s?

Justice needs to do some crazy porno leaked video. We have to see this.

a) I don't care what's legal wherever the fuck you are from.
b) No, people didn't forget. People got civilized, unlike you, motherfucker.
 
seattle6418 said:
I´m so glad i stop by this thread:lol

Victoria Justice is my new high school goddess.

Also, 14 and up is good here.

Damn you americans and your "18" tea party restrictions.

I mean, a girl that 15-16 most of the times is already hot. People forget that girls used to get married at the ages of 13-14 back in the 1900´s?

Justice needs to do some crazy porno leaked video. We have to see this.
...14 and up? I'm sorry. Not only is that creepy ... that's terrible.
 
fudgey_lumpkins said:
Can we kill the ethnocentrism please? Thanks.

But you know, there are other countries which do have their own age of consent. Most of Europe is 14-16+ and have no problem making their mark on the UN list of best countries.
 

Lebron

Member
seattle6418 said:
I´m so glad i stop by this thread:lol

Victoria Justice is my new high school goddess.

Also, 14 and up is good here.

Damn you americans and your "18" tea party restrictions.

I mean, a girl that 15-16 most of the times is already hot. People forget that girls used to get married at the ages of 13-14 back in the 1900´s?

Justice needs to do some crazy porno leaked video. We have to see this.
You live in the Land of the Culo, also known as Brazil, where wild Adriana Lima's roam the beaches. Stop giving out juice boxes and go catch them Lima's.
 

Shanadeus

Banned
Holy shit at you people :lol

And while an aoc of 14 is a bit a on the low side it's just one-two years from the commonly accepted age limit in most civilized countries.
 

Salacious Crumb

Junior Member
Shanadeus said:
Holy shit at you people :lol

And while an aoc of 14 is a bit a on the low side it's just one-two years from the commonly accepted age limit in most civilized countries.

It's only commonly accepted when the person lusting over the 16 year old is also 16 or there abouts.
 

Fuzzy

I would bang a hot farmer!
I have a simple rule, she has to have graduated high school. If she hasn't then it means one of two things:

1. She's too young.
or
2. She's a moron.

:D
 
Salazar said:
a) I don't care what's legal wherever the fuck you are from.
b) No, people didn't forget. People got civilized, unlike you, motherfucker.
What gives you the right to decide what's civilized in every country? I can guarantee that a 14 year old chick where he is from is more mature than a 20 year old in America.

What's with all the judgmental pricks here? It's alright to be attracted to an underage girl, just (depending on your region) keep those feelings in check or you're going to go to jail. Does not mean you are wrong, it's just the law. I'm sure if they raised the age to 20 - you'd still be attracted to 19 year olds.
 

Salazar

Member
Darknessbear said:
What gives you the right to decide what's civilized in every country?

Sovereignty of opinion is as much a neurological fact as a philosophical right and a social good. I'm not deciding for anybody else. I happen to think my judgement is good, though.

Darknessbear said:
I can guarantee that a 14 year old chick where he is from is more mature than a 20 year old in America.

Yikes. Bullshit.

Darknessbear said:
What's with all the judgmental pricks here? It's alright to be attracted to an underage girl, just (depending on your region) keep those feelings in check or you're going to go to jail. Does not mean you are wrong, it's just the law. I'm sure if they raised the age to 20 - you'd still be attracted to 19 year olds.

The post was '14 and up is good here', followed by some risible crap about how you used to be able to marry very young girls. Of course, those girls typically didn't have a say in the matter, which adds idiocy to the offensiveness of the remark. I thought the post was conspicuously creepy and out of line, even for this thread.
 
Salazar said:
The post was '14 and up is good here', followed by some risible crap about how you used to be able to marry very young girls. Of course, those girls typically didn't have a say in the matter, which adds idiocy to the offensiveness of the remark. I thought the post was conspicuously creepy and out of line, even for this thread.
Realistically in most of the world over 18 is not the norm:
http://imgur.com/Wamrq.png
 

StuBurns

Banned
I think this is a touchy subject, and really it's more a case of natural instinct than anything else. Some of the girls in this thread, as old as twenty still look very child like to me, there is an aversion to the idea of them sexually, where as with Justice, she is only seventeen and I think she looks adult and attractive in a sexual manner.

The legal ages are not there to convict people who sleep with a girl a few days under 18, they're there to protect children. Some girls are still children at 18, some are still children at 20 but the line has to be drawn somewhere.

We should go easy on calling each other perverts and pedophiles, although I don't think anyone has been seriously offended in the thread, if you're going in a thread with this title, you know what you're getting.
 
StuBurns said:
I think this is a touchy subject, and really it's more a case of natural instinct than anything else. Some of the girls in this thread, as old as twenty still look very child like to me, there is an aversion to the idea of them sexually, where as with Justice, she is only seventeen and I think she looks adult and attractive in a sexual manner.

The legal ages are not there to convict people who sleep with a girl a few days under 18, they're there to protect children. Some girls are still children at 18, some are still children at 20 but the line has to be drawn somewhere.

We should go easy on calling each other perverts and pedophiles, although I don't think anyone has been seriously offended in the thread, if you're going in a thread with this title, you know what you're getting.
It's just always been a pet peeve of mine when another judges someones sexual preference or what someone finds attractive in a chick. Difference in sexual attraction keeps us from all liking the same chicks and provides balance.
 

Salazar

Member
Darknessbear said:
It's just always been a pet peeve of mine when another judges someones sexual preference

If someone's sexual preference is reducible to the low age of the male or female involved, then I am entirely secure in judging them.
 
Darknessbear said:
It's just always been a pet peeve of mine when another judges someones sexual preference or what someone finds attractive in a chick. Difference in sexual attraction keeps us from all liking the same chicks and provides balance.

StuBurns is on the money. It's one thing if they're 16-17 but look like they're sexually mature. It's completely different if your "preference" is for those who clearly look like they are pre-pubescent. It's not about opinion at that point, it's about sexual dysfunction.

The legal line has to be drawn in order to protect those who are still in fact children, irregardless if others mature before that legal line.
 
The Shadow said:
StuBurns is on the money. It's one thing if they're 16-17 but look like they're sexually mature. It's completely different if your "preference" is for those who clearly look like they are pre-pubescent. It's not about opinion at that point, it's about sexual dysfunction.

The legal line has to be drawn in order to protect those who are still in fact children, irregardless if others mature before that legal line.
Protect children? So if they are of legal age, but look younger than we should protect them?

And we were discussing the guy who's countries legal age is 14. So we still persecute him in that case - because we feel it's wrong? I don't see your guys logic. And I feel you guys are missing the line between attraction and action.

And how are you protecting the children on an online game forum?

Salazar said:
If someone's sexual preference is reducible to the low age of the male or female involved, then I am entirely secure in judging them.

Why not go into the weed thread and berate those people for partaking in a illegal substance in America? Is this about legality or your morality?
 

Salazar

Member
Darknessbear said:
Protect children? So if they are of legal age, but look younger than we should protect them?

I don't even know how you typed this without your hands rebelling against its arrant nonsensicality.

Darknessbear said:
And we were discussing the guy who's countries legal age is 14. So we still persecute him in that case - because we feel it's wrong? I don't see your guys logic. And I feel you guys are missing the line between attraction and action.

I'm not persecuting him in any strong sense of the word, and a strong sense is pretty much the only one persecution has. Just calling a creepy post what it is.

Darknessbear said:
Why not go into the weed thread and berate those people for partaking in a illegal substance in America? Is this about legality or your morality?

Gaffers smoking weed doesn't trouble me. Gaffers saying '14 and up is good here' and that American restrictions are crazy and backwards troubles me. That's all.
 
Salazar said:
I don't even know how you typed this without your hands rebelling against its arrant nonsensicality.
Exactly my point, his statement made no sense.

I'm not persecuting him in any strong sense of the word, and a strong sense is pretty much the only one persecution has. Just calling a creepy post what it is.
Calling him a "motherfucker" is far from just stating it's creepiness. But, reading his post again it does come off creepy - but again it's his country, who cares.
 

Enco

Member
This thread has gone downhill :(

The above post kindaa makes up for it but it still needs to get back on track :p
 

big_z

Member
jojos face is a little off but props to her for attempting to leave the kiddy pop market and doing it well(based off the in the dark video posted above). miley should take note.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom