The thing about the lawsuit is that it makes the issue divisive when it didn't need to be. It could have just been a "gut check" where we see the line being stepped over, we realize why that line is there, and we move on. The lawsuit suddenly makes Michael Richards a victim of the situation as well, as it's clearly frivolous.borghe said:he shouldn't have said the stuff, but they shouldn't be able to sue after goading him into it. essentially the same as me punching you and then suing you because you punched back. simply uncalled for.
terrene said:The thing about the lawsuit is that it makes the issue divisive when it didn't need to be. It could have just been a "gut check" where we see the line being stepped over, we realize why that line is there, and we move on. The lawsuit suddenly makes Michael Richards a victim of the situation as well, as it's clearly frivolous.
In order to not be a frivolous lawsuit, these men would have to demonstrate personal harm and damages - something they not only have neglected to mention, and their lawyer neglected to mention, but that they actually dodged in the interview, saying something to the effect that they'd "let the lawyer figure out" their legal standing in the matter. Compare this to the TV producer who lost her job due to Borat , who repeatedly discusses how her firing has affected her. The Michael Richards lawsuit just smells like bullshit - and that's before you even get into the whole question of whether everyone who experiences a disturbing or offensive remark is entitled to financial compensation. Bleh.
dem said:Uh.. no. Its not a threat. He's basically talking down to them.
If you say to a jew "50 years ago they would throw you in an oven!".. is that a threat? Ofcourse not.
Blackace said:Um yes it is threatening.. very. if you don't want to believe so that is fine. But it is indeed a threat. Body langauge aside the words are threatening.. both examples...
Talking down to someone can be threatening... just because he wanted to talk down to someone doesn't mean it isn't threatening.
Thomson & Gale Legal Encyclopedia said:A mere threat that does not cause any harm is generally not actionable. When combined with apparently imminent bodily harm, however, a threat is an assault for which the offender might be subject to civil or criminal liability.
SnakeswithLasers said:There was nothing imminent about what he did. He was on a stage doing a routine (poorly). End of story. These people are just gold digging.
Blackace said:I care less about the lawsuit, really.. But it is a threat, and that is all I wanted to establish..
borghe said:he shouldn't have said the stuff, but they shouldn't be able to sue after goading him into it. essentially the same as me punching you and then suing you because you punched back. simply uncalled for.
SnakeswithLasers said:I guess it could be construed that way.
However, I'm more than willing to bet that if there wasn't the ability to sue over this, no one would have ever thought to think of Richards' outburst as a threat. The initial reactions to the incident (from what I've seen) mentioned nothing about a threat or fear or any reaction other than outrage.
In fact, the victims' reaction from the tape I saw was to walk out and yell "That's uncalled for" and to vaguely threaten Richards. If I remember correctly, they said something about "going out back" and "seeing what's up" and Richards then asked if they were threatening him. I guess it'd just be too funny for him to sue them over this...
Blackace said:He has a right to counter sue or sue over those threats. And what they did say back to him was indeed threaten..
It is really hard to try to pick apart the words that he said because they are so many feelings mixed up in there.. threatening is one.. most racist comments are threatening to said group..
I agree they have the right to, I don't think the right to sue needs to be curtailed or anything like that. But it is a frivolous lawsuit and will waste a lot of time and money while getting nowhere. Although, it could imitate the OJ trial's "racial divide" where the side claiming racism is able to implant the idea in the public's mind that a certain outcome is "pro-racism." This happened in Hollywood - I sure hope the trial isn't televised. It doesn't seem to be as sensational a trial as Michael Jackson or something, but I'm sure it will pique public interest once it begins. If Richards is smart (and it wouldn't appear he is), he'll settle out of court. Again: Bleh.Shinobi said:But saying they shouldn't be able to launch it just doesn't make sense. Shit, it's America...the constitution basically guarantees the right to sue. :lol
anger can make you say shit you don't mean at all. when someone REALLY hits your button, you will lash out with the most mean thing that comes to you. i really feel this is more of an anger and maturity issue than it is a racist one.JeffDowns said:Exactly... I agree with this post.... Now that, would have been cool. blow for blow... but this dude obviously is a REAL racist.. He has pent up issues. A lot of folks will say, what about when black comedians say "cracker". Dude this is in no way the same league. This dude was actually PISSED, and meant that with all of his heart.
wait, i thought the Portuguese started the slave trade?DeathCabCute said:If this even matters but nigger comes from negro which in Spanish means black. Since the Spaniards introduced slavery to America they called blacks negro's which later got mispronounced into nigger.
shpankey said:wait, i thought the Portuguese started the slave trade?
shpankey said:wait, i thought the Portuguese started the slave trade?
DeathCabCute said:Portuguese do speak a kind of spanish as well, or is it exactly spanish, but no it was the spaniards. They were afterall the ones who first colonized the new world. America is named after one of them.
GoutPatrol said:Amerigo Vespucci was Italian.
DeathCabCute said:Yes, correct. Need a refresher.
Ichirou_Oogami said:And portuguese don't speak a kind of spanish, they speak...portuguese.
PhoenixDark said:Black people should be more like white people. I'm a huge sellout
PhoenixDark said:This is self hate, and I don't think we can simply blame this on slavery and white people and move on. This behavior and attitude is re-inforced and propagated by blacks now. BET? Mainstream rap music? Soulplane? As has been said before, it has come to a point where some of us are running the minstrel show and profiting off it. But in the end we all lose.
DeathCabCute said:
Wikipedia said:Although the vocabularies of Spanish and Portuguese are quite similar, phonetically Portuguese is somewhat closer to Catalan or to French. It is often claimed that the complex phonology of Portuguese compared to Spanish explains why it is generally not intelligible to Spanish speakers despite the strong lexical similarity between the two languages.
Ichirou_Oogami said:Yeah, uhm...they're two different languages. Please don't try to justify your ignorance. Take it like a man, move on. :lol
Ichirou_Oogami said:If you can't understand what someone else is saying, guess what...you two might not be speaking the same language!
3kuSaS said:j/k
You make some very good points, but I get this vibe from you that you are so involved in white American culture that you have almost completely abandoned your racial identity. I understand you have had some bad experiences with people of your own race, but theres no need to hate your own people because of a few assholes. There are plenty of white kids who pick on other whites for being smart or liking certain types of music too. It's not a black thing man.
3kuSaS said:And Black mainstream music glorifies violence in the same way action/gangster movies do.
3kuSaS said:But anyway, like it or not, the N word is ours. I believe it is our right to use the word however we want to use it. If we want to turn it into a term of endearment, so be it. It's already been established that the word can be used by whites in a tasteful manner. Plenty of white comedians have done so. But Richards, racist or not, used the word in such a hateful, disgusting manner. Personally, I'm more pissed off about the "hanging upside down with a fork up your ass comment" than him saying nigger, and I think everyone else should be more upset over that remark as well.
DeathCabCute said:Did I ever say they were the same language?
DeathCabCute said:Portuguese do speak a kind of spanish as well, or is it exactly spanish, but no it was the spaniards. They were afterall the ones who first colonized the new world. America is named after one of them.
Hey now, the media gave us plenty of stupid bullshit stories to care about even with two wars going on and Hurricane Katrina. We got ourselves the missing white girl in Aruba, the runaway bride, Paris Hilton's sex tape, Britney Spears's multiple weddings, Tom Cruise, OMG Brad Pitt dumped Jennifer Aniston!, etc.White Man said:4) Thinking about the ratio of this incidence's triviality in comparison to the amount of media attention it received, it kinda feels like the good ol' pre-Bush America. We can finally, once again, care about stupid bullshit again. God bless America.
Ichirou_Oogami said:Yes, you did.
Ichirou_Oogami said:regional Spanish like Andalucian Spanish or Argentinian Spanish
Big word? I'm sorry but are you in high school? If so, Im very sorry for fighting with you young man. Could you please call your dad to the computer so I can continue this "riveting" discussion with an adult? Thanks.Ichirou_Oogami said:big words like "phonology"
DeathCabCute said:So now you are telling me what I said. Does this make arguing with me easier, when you can make my argument for me then dispute it. Whatever works.
DeathCabCute said:Tell you what. The next time you see someone refer to two different languages in the same sentence with the word kind in them it's safe to assume they're only referring to vast similarities and not that they're the same language.
DeathCabCute said:These examples are regional only and really have nothing to do with comparing similarities between two different languages. By the way its Argentinean not Argentinian. Also Andalusian not Andalucian
DeathCabCute said:Big word? I'm sorry but are you in high school? If so, Im very sorry for fighting with you young man. Could you please call your dad to the computer so I can continue this "riveting" discussion with an adult? Thanks.
3kuSaS said:j/k
You make some very good points, but I get this vibe from you that you are so involved in white American culture that you have almost completely abandoned your racial identity. I understand you have had some bad experiences with people of your own race, but theres no need to hate your own people because of a few assholes. There are plenty of white kids who pick on other whites for being smart or liking certain types of music too. It's not a black thing man.
PhoenixDark said:This is why I cannot be offended by what someone as insignifigant as Michael Richards said. This is why I have absolutely no respect for the likes of Jesse Jackson or Paul Mooney, who both actually lived through the Civil Rights era yet only now realize nigger shouldn't be said by anyone. They are disgraceful, and these are our "leaders"?
Jesse Jackson, Paul Mooney, and the National Black Caucus should be ashamed of themselves and their pathetic "leadership".
travisbickle said:Hey look, phoenix dark is back, has he lost his virginity yet?
btf1980 said:Paul Mooney is a leader of the black community? Brotha, you really have been gone for a long time haven't you. j/k :lol
Shanadeus said:I had completely missed that this had happened and am quite a bit late to the party but figured I'd share my opinion anyway. I had been happily enjoying Seinfeld and Kramer until I saw this a couple of days ago - now I feel sorry for Kramer whenever I see him as I know what a sad future he has in store.
It's so sad to see him apologize in front of a previous co-actor that's gained tremendous success while he's nothing but a failed, washed out actor who only get by because of a role ten years ago.
:lolShanadeus said:I had completely missed that this had happened and am quite a bit late to the party but figured I'd share my opinion anyway. I had been happily enjoying Seinfeld and Kramer until I saw this a couple of days ago - now I feel sorry for Kramer whenever I see him as I know what a sad future he has in store.
Shanadeus said:I had completely missed that this had happened and am quite a bit late to the party but figured I'd share my opinion anyway. I had been happily enjoying Seinfeld and Kramer until I saw this a couple of days ago - now I feel sorry for Kramer whenever I see him as I know what a sad future he has in store.
It's so sad to see him apologize in front of a previous co-actor that's gained tremendous success while he's nothing but a failed, washed out actor who only get by because of a role ten years ago.
How did you find this thread? Last post was made in 2006.Shanadeus said:I had completely missed that this had happened and am quite a bit late to the party but figured I'd share my opinion anyway. I had been happily enjoying Seinfeld and Kramer until I saw this a couple of days ago - now I feel sorry for Kramer whenever I see him as I know what a sad future he has in store.
It's so sad to see him apologize in front of a previous co-actor that's gained tremendous success while he's nothing but a failed, washed out actor who only get by because of a role ten years ago.
I always search for existing threads before creating one - no point in creating a thread if there's already one on the topic.Salazar said::lol
How did you even find this thread ?
Shanadeus said:I had completely missed that this had happened and am quite a bit late to the party but figured I'd share my opinion anyway. I had been happily enjoying Seinfeld and Kramer until I saw this a couple of days ago - now I feel sorry for Kramer whenever I see him as I know what a sad future he has in store.
It's so sad to see him apologize in front of a previous co-actor that's gained tremendous success while he's nothing but a failed, washed out actor who only get by because of a role ten years ago.