Gotta go with Fellowship. Just the most fantasy movie rather than battle movie
While I don't think the other two were quite so bad, I'd have to agree with Fellowship of the Ring, with a large gap between that and the Two Tower and another large gap for Return of the King.The only one really worth it is Fellowship imo and I consider that one a modern classic. Both Two Towers and RoTK were several magnitudes worse to me. They both felt so fake, especially RoTK just felt like a giant CG fest, whereas Fellowship at least felt like a movie.
To anyone mentioning the Hobbit trilogy...Leave now, and never come back!
The Two Towers gets a little tedious with the Ents, but Helm's Deep is excellent aside from extreme skateboarding Legolas.
If you mean what I think you mean then the opposite is actually true. Half of Return of the King is Two Towers (or more like a quarter). The Two Towers book ends with Frodo captured at Cirith Ungol. Jackson had to stretch things out since he knew he was cutting the Scouring of the Shire from RotK, so he created the Osgiliath subplot for the second film and moved Shelob to RotK.My memory may be off but wasn't the Two Towers movie mostly a cheat and half of it is Return of the King anyway?
If you mean what I think you mean then the opposite is actually true. Half of Return of the King is Two Towers (or more like a quarter). The Two Towers book ends with Frodo captured at Cirith Ungol. Jackson had to stretch things out since he knew he was cutting the Scouring of the Shire from RotK, so he created the Osgiliath subplot for the second film and moved Shelob to RotK.
Fellowship of the Ring.
Starts small, charming and adventurous, and then gets progressively bigger with nearly perfect pacing and some really great drama beats. Gandalf* and Boromir deaths are the cherry on top of two of the best action scenes Jackson ever directed, even if they are not as big as the battles in the consecutive films. You really feel the human weight here.
This.1. Fellowship of the Ring
2. Return of the King
3. The Two Towers
Nope. Fellowship is good, then the rest isn't worth bothering with.They're one movie in three parts.
If you mean what I think you mean then the opposite is actually true. Half of Return of the King is Two Towers (or more like a quarter). The Two Towers book ends with Frodo captured at Cirith Ungol. Jackson had to stretch things out since he knew he was cutting the Scouring of the Shire from RotK, so he created the Osgiliath subplot for the second film and moved Shelob to RotK.
I can't even properly measure the extent of how wrong this is. There aren't enough nopes in the world.Nope. Fellowship is good, then the rest isn't worth bothering with.
No.
Shelob is moved to ROTK because that's how the chronology works. They explain this in the special features. When Frodo and Sam are climbing the Cirith Ungol steps, Pippin and Gandalf are looking at Mordor from Minas Tirith.
They can't have Frodo and Sam climbing the steps if Gandalf and Pippin are still stuck back in their respective TTT storylines.
Fellowship. It always felt so much better on a film making level to me. The only shot from the other two that I thought was on the same level as Fellowship was Gandolf falling into the underground cavern with the Balrog. I enjoy the other movies just fine, but Fellowship was a marvel.
Also, Fellowship has Boromir, who is the best character.
The battle at the end of FOTR, particularly with Boromir, has some awful editing. Weird sword swipes that have no power yet knock orcs down. Then there's the ridiculous rock throwing Hobbits. I love the movie, and think it's the best one, but it has some less than great directing.
That Aragorn v Lurtz battle tho