• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Why is there no major movement to legalize Prostitution?

Cocaloch

Member
Here in Scotland it's legal, and my understanding is that there's a lot of trafficking with Eastern European women in places like Glasgow. I'll be surprised if it's just a puritan issue like many in this thread are making it out to be.

You're right, but I think it's funny to imply that puritanism isn't involved here because it can't explain Scotland. The reason the Scots didn't have a puritan movement is because the Puritan's main goal was to make England more like Scotland.

Edit: actually this make sense considering you were saying it was legal in Scotland. I guess I'm just confused because of that poster saying it's not totally legal in the UK. Did he mean England and Wales? The OP already said there were legal complications in NI.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
The newest argument I've seen is sex trafficking. Except you don't exactly need sex trafficking if you can hire locals.
 

kmax

Member
Because sex, much like drugs is stigmatized. Politicians don't want to touch it, especially within the conservative bible belt circles.
 

Ferr986

Member
Yes.

Legalization of prostitution doesn't lead to an increase in female workers that can remotely match the increased demand. This results in an often significant increase in human & sex trafficking to make up for that increased demand.

There are plenty of reasons to be against legalized prostitution, precisely because you can see the implementation of said policies world wofe and how ineggevtive they are at protecting the women they seek to.

Yep.

Seriously, the issue is more complicated that the usual "lol puritanism" memes that plagues gaming side.
 

BajiBoxer

Banned
I'm just going off the thread since I know nothing about prostitution laws anywhere. The OP should probably be updated with this if true, though I should have guessed something was up since it lists the UK as having legal prostitution, and contrasts it with Northern Ireland.

Anyway this point isn't particularly germane. American Puritanism is clearly not the answer because it's not like the rest of the developed western world has legalized prostitution.



That's exactly why a power aware framework could argue it was rape with society itself coercing sex. I don't necessarily agree, but I've never really thought of a good way around this issue other than being much more specific about what we mean by consent.

American Puritanism, imo, is why it won't even be brought up as the beginning of an idea for most politicians. If it got to that point, then yes, it would be far more complicated.
 
Wait. Isn't that basically the same as it being illegal?

Mostly. The goal is to protect the women who is being forced into prostitution by removing entirely what happens in other places: police arrest sex worker and buyer, both go to jail. Women is a victim, but ends up suffering even more through no fault of her own.
 

Apathy

Member
Quite frankly, anyone that stands up for legalization of prostitution will get branded as some pervert. regardless of how cogent and fact based arguments they have their opponents will brand them as such to discredit them. Society seems to have issues with that and don't want anything to do with people that are branded as such.
 

Lmo911

Member
Human Trafficking.

Really it's not like legalizing pot where you just grow the stuff. You have to find people who are either willing or are forced to be willing. That's the problem with legalizing prostitution. You may jump start a million "private business owners" but then there's always going to be people using other people to meet demand.

Also humanity is still failing pretty hard at treating women as equals and I personally don't know if the selling of sexual favors is something that will better or worsen that.

You would need to regulate the shit out of it to happen and frankly I don't think the US is capable or ready.
 
The newest argument I've seen is sex trafficking. Except you don't exactly need sex trafficking if you can hire locals.

See below.

That's under the assumption there's locals that want to be prostitutes, and if they were employeed in good faith.

Precisely. The demand for prostitutes is generally significantly higher than women actually entering the field. And that gap is a lucrative field many organizations love to fill up quickly.

If you legalized prostitution across America tomorrow, you won't find remotely enough women willing to work in the field as demand will have risen for them and will continue to rise across time. And where are all those, largely what will end up being underage girls, come from?
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
See below.



Precisely. The demand for prostitutes is generally significantly higher than women actually entering the field. And that gap is a lucrative field many organizations love to fill up quickly.

If you legalized prostitution across America tomorrow, you won't find remotely enough women willing to work in the field as demand will have risen for them and will continue to rise across time. And where are all those, largely what will end up being underage girls, come from?

There's a ton of assumptions here, and how is it different under legality than it is now?

These theories about sex trafficking under legalized prostitution seem to operate under the assumption that it would make street walkers and pimps legal, which it generally doesn't.
 

carlsojo

Member
My opinion is that it's more than a little naive to think that legalization of prostitution will have positive outcomes for women or society in general.
 

BajiBoxer

Banned
Wait. Isn't that basically the same as it being illegal?

Sort of. It gives control of the situation to the woman. She could get someone arrested for breaking her rules, being abusive, harassing her, etc. without going to jail herself. If she were reputable and you weren't a creep/moron there'd probably be no issue.
 
Yep.

Seriously, the issue is more complicated that the usual "lol puritanism" memes that plagues gaming side.

In that sense it's very similar to plural marriage. In THEORY there should be no problem with one dude marrying four women, but in practice this has led to a very bad deal for the women - they're often not entering into those marriages willingly. It's harder to separate out the bad parts than you think.
 
Here is a prominent study on prostitution leading to more trafficking:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1986065

Generally, the method that works best in regards to protecting the women is to legalize selling sex but make the act of buying sex illegal.


Other issues with prostitution:
- Amount of underage girls
- Inadequate systems in place essentially legalize pimping rather than helping the women in any meaningful way
So, will OP consider things like this at all?

And more so, the people rambling about puritanism etc etc.

I don't understand these "puritanical" comments. People oppose prostitution for far more nuanced reasons than "puritanical roots."

Prostitution, arguably the most controversial of the "vice" industries, is unpopular because people feel it commodifies women. They view sex for pay as coercive, not consensual. Feminist opposition to prostitution is based on the belief that prostitution is a misogynist construct to begin with and industrializing it legitimizes the idea that women are for sale.

There are other arguments that interpret sex as a form of labor and no different than any other labor-intensive occupation. There are arguments that women should be able to do whatever they want with their bodies. There are arguments that commercialized prostitution validates everything feminists oppose pertaining to the objectification of their sex and there are arguments that commercial prostitution liberates and deregulates women to make decisions about their own sexuality.

There is an immense amount of argument to be had over this topic and no conclusion, for or against, is "common sense."
Thank you. Besides the statistics not being nearly so simple as that one could say legalizing it is only a good thing, the subject really isn't so simple in itself otherwise either.

But it's cool to make comments about how there's no point other than people being puritanical, I guess. To be fair, there are a lot of issues in how people view things like nudity and sex especially compared to violence, but reducing the issue to one simple reason like that is sad and silly.
 
Human Trafficking.

Really it's not like legalizing pot where you just grow the stuff. You have to find people who are either willing or are forced to be willing. That's the problem with legalizing prostitution. You may jump start a million "private business owners" but then there's always going to be people using other people to meet demand. Op

Also humanity is still failing pretty hard at treating women as equals and I personally don't know if the selling of sexual favors is something that will better or worsen that.

You would need to regulate the shit out of it to happen and frankly I don't think the US is capable or ready.
A woman's right to control their own body and monetize their chosen profession should be a fundamental right. Trafficking can happen just as much in the pornography industry, but we don't outlaw that. Not to mention the fact that in most places where prostitution is illegal, it's perfectly legal to pay for sex if it's filmed and sold.
 

EGM1966

Member
No moral objection but solving trafficking, abuse, health and discrimination challenges would be formidable.

Most places with it legalised have issues with all of above so far as I'm aware and just making it legal doesn't solve them.

Major regulation, social and medical headache to support this.
 

SeanTSC

Member
Yep.

Seriously, the issue is more complicated that the usual "lol puritanism" memes that plagues gaming side.

While I absolutely agree that the issue is far more complicated and nuanced than that I guarantee you that "lol puritanism" is the #1 reason that it's illegal in America. Sure, there are much better arguments against legalized prostitution and major problems with it, but the majority of the country doesn't give a fuck about that. If someone asks why there's no major movement to legalize it in America then "puritanism" and political suicide should be the first answer on your list, then you go through the actual arguments against it from there, but they're completely secondary in this country.
 

Ri'Orius

Member
Yeah but it's creating an extra option .
They don't have to enter that line of work but have an extra option .

By this logic, abolishing the minimum wage would just create an extra option for people to work for unfair wages. But they don't have to, so it's fine, right? Same for dropping workplace safety regulations: people would have the option of working at an unsafe coal mine, but nothing's forcing them to...

In some ways think of the government as a union, a form of collective bargaining. We all say together, "We're not willing to work under X conditions, or for less than a certain wage." And the economy has to adapt to that. Because without those regulations, individuals who have to compete with each other for resources are incentivized to race to the bottom.
 
Here is a prominent study on prostitution leading to more trafficking:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1986065

A good read. I wonder if this says more about the nations' ability to combat the criminal underworld than it does about prostitution itself?

The act itself isn't the problem here, but it seems clear that legalization would also require strict regulation. I'd assume that this would be less of an issue in a hypothetical scenario where prostitution was always legal and free of stigma, as the disparity between the massive spike in demand and the number of women filling that demand is the core issue.
 
Yeah but it's creating an extra option .
They don't have to enter that line of work but have an extra option .

Currently Low-skilled workers are stuck with very low paying jobs- and even getting an education isn't guarantee you will get a good job .

Plus those that already forced into prostitution would benefit from safety , hygiene , freedom.

Extra options does not equate to good opportunities and protection for individuals.
 

Strax

Member
This is something I've been thinking about for sometime and I still have no idea where I stand. I think it's extra strange because living in maybe the most liberal country in the world is full of paradox. Prostitution is legal for the person selling unless a outsider/pimp takes a cut but it's illegal to buy it. Anybody who would say openly they're a prostitute would be shunned by most. At the same time one of the biggest movements here revolves women being able to do whatever they want with their bodies.

Two summers ago I was working as supervisor for a city program to teach youth some manual labor, basically light gardening work, for those who wanted it. And of course the kids would get money for their work. 1-2 months prior to the summer #freethenipple swept the nation, so much so that the biggest newspaper had four topless women on the front page, a congresswomen posted a picture of her topless and so on. During a group meeting of supervisors, about 30 people, before we met the kids I asked how we should handle it if some of the girls (14-15 year olds) wanted to work topless like the boys have done in hot weather. I barely finished my question before 5 coworkers started yelling at me for trying to suppress women, not knowing I was in favour of the movement. I just wanted to makes sure I wouldn't be accused of some kind of crime by the parents.

These kinds of topics are a minefield.
 

Peltz

Member
No, because in interacting with a (legal) prostitute the john has to go through the process of a normal business transaction and must communicate with their partner to get what they want out of them.

A fictional character has no agency outside of that implied by their writing, and frequently are written to be male sex fantasies anyway. Bayonetta is in that grey area where she can go either way, but the grand majority of female characters in fiction are not treated well (see the thread in off-topic about how often female characters get the worst lines).

Mind you, I am well aware that many johns will treat women poorly in general, but that is a consequence of societal misogyny and less so a feature of the profession.

I'd argue that the legality has nothing to do with the objectification. And the transactional nature of prostitution is an objectification in and of itself. "Communication" has nothing to do with the realities of it.

The prostitute is still treated as a fungible tool or mechanism for getting off. And he or she is being reduced to a physical body.
 
This used to be my field before I moved to counter-terrorism.

The quoted reports state that legalization means more reports of human trafficking, in other words more discovery. That's a logical consequence of sex workers and their enablers being more cooperative and open with the authorities - suddenly stuff that was underground comes to the surface.

Nowhere is there any credible evidence that the number of actual trafficked human beings goes up or down based on policy measures. The total sum of human trafficking is, in law enforcement terms, a 'dark number' - our best criminologists can only estimate the volume but it's impossible to measure accurately as of 2017.

More discovery does NOT mean that legalization 'leads to' more human trafficking. More discovery is a good thing for those of us who prefer to fight this evil with the clearest possible picture.

But a lot of policy makers and citizens would prefer to have the problem disappear under the rug so we can pretend it's not happening in the shadows.
 
It's not perfect in Germany concerning brothels and the human trafficking that still occurs but it would be worse if it wasn't legal.

Since there are many types of brothels (such as gay ones for men), everyone working in prostitution man or woman have more protections working in this field by law, brothels have to operate to a standard for hygiene and women's health (both physically and mentally) because it is a legal work place. Brothels are frequently checked up on.

Also it's important because clients to brothels are more accountable legally, it lessens the freedom of abuse.

Again, human trafficking still occurs primarily from Eastern Europe, there are often raids but authorities are constantly working on it, I think it's better than if it was completely illegal. Brothels are still involved with crime such as drugs and the mafia, it's not perfect, but I personally think it's better than if it was all left to be criminal and underground. There is more transparency and help for men and women involved than there would be otherwise.
 

Peltz

Member
I don't understand these "puritanical" comments. People oppose prostitution for far more nuanced reasons than "puritanical roots."

Prostitution, arguably the most controversial of the "vice" industries, is unpopular because people feel it commodifies women. They view sex for pay as coercive, not consensual. Feminist opposition to prostitution is based on the belief that prostitution is a misogynist construct to begin with and industrializing it legitimizes the idea that women are for sale.

There are other arguments that interpret sex as a form of labor and no different than any other labor-intensive occupation. There are arguments that women should be able to do whatever they want with their bodies. There are arguments that commercialized prostitution validates everything feminists oppose pertaining to the objectification of their sex and there are arguments that commercial prostitution liberates and deregulates women to make decisions about their own sexuality.

There is an immense amount of argument to be had over this topic and no conclusion, for or against, is "common sense."
I agree with those who hold the views in your second paragraph. And I am not religious in any sense of the word. It's just logical to me that women are devalued by a prostitution-condoning society.

So it shouldn't be legalized.
 
I agree with those who hold the views in your second paragraph. And I am not religious in any sense of the word. It's just logical to me that women are devalued by a prostitution-condoning society.

So it shouldn't be legalized.

I'm sympathetic to this view.

But let's assume that prostitution, like the recreational use of narcotics, is going to happen regardless of pervasive morality and even legal enforcement. Even the harshest dictatorial and/or religious regimes in the world have been unable to stomp it out.

Is it not more sensible and humane to design policy around the acceptance of this phenomenon and putting the energy into mitigating the worst effects?
 

Clefargle

Member
The Dutch have it figured out over here, but I know that back home in America, it's political suicide to bring it up. Just like being an atheist or Muslim, you have nearly zero political future if you talk about anything other than how prostitution is bad mmmkay
 

Oersted

Member
Legal, and regulated (in modern countries, that is).

You want to do it? So be it, and be sure to pay your taxes. xD

And prostitution means men and women alike, of course.

In theory. Saying men are massively outnumbered would be lowballing.

And not all modern countries.
 
I'm sympathetic to this view.

But let's assume that prostitution, like the recreational use of narcotics, is going to happen regardless of pervasive morality and even legal enforcement. Even the harshest dictatorial and/or religious regimes in the world have been unable to stomp it out.

Is it not more sensible and humane to design policy around the acceptance of this phenomenon and putting the energy into mitigating the worst effects?



That's an old debate. These things happens regardless. The problem is wouldnt legalize it leads to accept it as a norm in our society ?
 

Hazmat

Member
The answer is a lot more complicated than "lol puritans." If you have legalized brothels, you're still going to have young women working there that were teenage runaways that got turned out by some guy, only now it's legal for them to give $40 blowjobs at the expense of their well-being. I don't want to see any of these women in jail, but legalizing doesn't make all the parts of it that are really gross go away.

I would fully support legalized prostitution if no one was being seriously taken advantage of, if it was just a buyer and a seller who were making a transaction that they both felt good about. I don't really see that happening, so I'm not surprised no politician wants to touch it.
 
The Dutch have it figured out over here, but I know that back home in America, it's political suicide to bring it up. Just like being an atheist or Muslim, you have nearly zero political future if you talk about anything other than how prostitution is bad mmmkay

Well, I'm happy we've been making strides but it's not all rainbows and sunshine in the Netherlands either. However, I can unequivocally say that our ability to fight trafficking networks has been boosted dramatically by having most sex work 'above board' and accountable. Most investigative breakthroughs come from the sex workers themselves and you really don't want to put them in a place where they fear the cops more than the criminals.

That's an old debate. These things happens regardless. The problem is wouldnt legalize it leads to accept it as a norm in our society ?

It's hardly become a norm in my country, so... I don't know?
 
I feel like there is something I'm missing here. Anyone mind helping out the slowest child in the classroom?
In prostitution, one person pays another for sexual gratification.
In porn, a third party pays one or multiple people for sexual gratification, which others then also pay for and consume for the same purpose.

In places where paying in exchange for sex is illegal, it is often perfectly legal to pay for sex if it's being filled for sale or ad generation.
 
The answer is a lot more complicated than "lol puritans." If you have legalized brothels, you're still going to have young women working there that were teenage runaways that got turned out by some guy, only now it's legal for them to give $40 blowjobs at the expense of their well-being. I don't want to see any of these women in jail, but legalizing doesn't make all the parts of it that are really gross go away.

Yeah, making it so that that runaway teenager can be imprisoned or extorted by the cops really makes his or her life better. I agree with you - legalization doesn't make the ugly parts of prostitution go away. The people exploited in this industry will be much better able to protect themselves if they know that calling the police won't result in them going to prison. It is a significant improvement, but at the end of the day being a survival sex worker is horrific.* Just not as horrific as the alternatives, and much less horrific than under a legalized regime.

In fact, it does the opposite of making it go away, and that's the problem. It allows these sex workers to rejoin mainstream society. They are more visible, at the expense of society not being able to pretend that they don't exist.

You can argue against legalizing prostitution on any number of fronts, but it stretches one's suspension of disbelief to claim that making someone's profession illegal makes them better off. This is not about the well being sex workers for you if you're in favor criminalization.

Sex workers are unanimous in pushing for legalization, and almost of them are also against the "Swedish model" of criminalizing Johns as well. You know how one important tenet of social justice is knowing when to shut up and trust that non-privileged people you're trying to help know what's best for them? This is a time to do that. Sex workers are in favor of legalization and until they're not, I'll defer to the people most affected by this legislation.

*Not every, or even most, sex workers are survival sex workers, and it is perfectly possible for the profession to be a good place to earn a living.
 
Individually yes they would be able to discriminate, the brothel or business could not discriminate. If no girl was willing to accept a customer I think they could refuse the customer on grounds that they cannot serve them.

Just like a hair stylist could refuse to do a certain hair style they have no knowledge in.

Why should the girl individually be allowed to discriminate? If it is just another job then they should not be allowed to run a business where they refuse to entertain a customer because of race, religion etc.
Not knowing how to do a hair style is very different though isn't it? I feel like you are dodging the question. If the girl says "I don't want to have sex with black/insert protected group here" do you believe we should use the same threats of fines (and prison if the fines are not payed) in order to force women to have sex?
 
Top Bottom