perfectchaos007
Member
One day I hope to get a legal rub and tug at a massage place in America. As of now those places run the risk of being raided
Here in Scotland it's legal, and my understanding is that there's a lot of trafficking with Eastern European women in places like Glasgow. I'll be surprised if it's just a puritan issue like many in this thread are making it out to be.
Yes.
Legalization of prostitution doesn't lead to an increase in female workers that can remotely match the increased demand. This results in an often significant increase in human & sex trafficking to make up for that increased demand.
There are plenty of reasons to be against legalized prostitution, precisely because you can see the implementation of said policies world wofe and how ineggevtive they are at protecting the women they seek to.
I'm just going off the thread since I know nothing about prostitution laws anywhere. The OP should probably be updated with this if true, though I should have guessed something was up since it lists the UK as having legal prostitution, and contrasts it with Northern Ireland.
Anyway this point isn't particularly germane. American Puritanism is clearly not the answer because it's not like the rest of the developed western world has legalized prostitution.
That's exactly why a power aware framework could argue it was rape with society itself coercing sex. I don't necessarily agree, but I've never really thought of a good way around this issue other than being much more specific about what we mean by consent.
Wait. Isn't that basically the same as it being illegal?
The newest argument I've seen is sex trafficking. Except you don't exactly need sex trafficking if you can hire locals.
The newest argument I've seen is sex trafficking. Except you don't exactly need sex trafficking if you can hire locals.
That's under the assumption there's locals that want to be prostitutes, and if they were employeed in good faith.
See below.
Precisely. The demand for prostitutes is generally significantly higher than women actually entering the field. And that gap is a lucrative field many organizations love to fill up quickly.
If you legalized prostitution across America tomorrow, you won't find remotely enough women willing to work in the field as demand will have risen for them and will continue to rise across time. And where are all those, largely what will end up being underage girls, come from?
America's Puritan heritage runs deep.
Wait. Isn't that basically the same as it being illegal?
There's a ton of assumptions here, and how is it different under legality than it is now? It's not like legalized prostitution makes street walkers and pimps legal.
Yep.
Seriously, the issue is more complicated that the usual "lol puritanism" memes that plagues gaming side.
So, will OP consider things like this at all?Here is a prominent study on prostitution leading to more trafficking:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1986065
Generally, the method that works best in regards to protecting the women is to legalize selling sex but make the act of buying sex illegal.
Other issues with prostitution:
- Amount of underage girls
- Inadequate systems in place essentially legalize pimping rather than helping the women in any meaningful way
Thank you. Besides the statistics not being nearly so simple as that one could say legalizing it is only a good thing, the subject really isn't so simple in itself otherwise either.I don't understand these "puritanical" comments. People oppose prostitution for far more nuanced reasons than "puritanical roots."
Prostitution, arguably the most controversial of the "vice" industries, is unpopular because people feel it commodifies women. They view sex for pay as coercive, not consensual. Feminist opposition to prostitution is based on the belief that prostitution is a misogynist construct to begin with and industrializing it legitimizes the idea that women are for sale.
There are other arguments that interpret sex as a form of labor and no different than any other labor-intensive occupation. There are arguments that women should be able to do whatever they want with their bodies. There are arguments that commercialized prostitution validates everything feminists oppose pertaining to the objectification of their sex and there are arguments that commercial prostitution liberates and deregulates women to make decisions about their own sexuality.
There is an immense amount of argument to be had over this topic and no conclusion, for or against, is "common sense."
A woman's right to control their own body and monetize their chosen profession should be a fundamental right. Trafficking can happen just as much in the pornography industry, but we don't outlaw that. Not to mention the fact that in most places where prostitution is illegal, it's perfectly legal to pay for sex if it's filmed and sold.Human Trafficking.
Really it's not like legalizing pot where you just grow the stuff. You have to find people who are either willing or are forced to be willing. That's the problem with legalizing prostitution. You may jump start a million "private business owners" but then there's always going to be people using other people to meet demand. Op
Also humanity is still failing pretty hard at treating women as equals and I personally don't know if the selling of sexual favors is something that will better or worsen that.
You would need to regulate the shit out of it to happen and frankly I don't think the US is capable or ready.
Yep.
Seriously, the issue is more complicated that the usual "lol puritanism" memes that plagues gaming side.
Yeah but it's creating an extra option .
They don't have to enter that line of work but have an extra option .
Here is a prominent study on prostitution leading to more trafficking:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1986065
Yeah but it's creating an extra option .
They don't have to enter that line of work but have an extra option .
Currently Low-skilled workers are stuck with very low paying jobs- and even getting an education isn't guarantee you will get a good job .
Plus those that already forced into prostitution would benefit from safety , hygiene , freedom.
No, because in interacting with a (legal) prostitute the john has to go through the process of a normal business transaction and must communicate with their partner to get what they want out of them.
A fictional character has no agency outside of that implied by their writing, and frequently are written to be male sex fantasies anyway. Bayonetta is in that grey area where she can go either way, but the grand majority of female characters in fiction are not treated well (see the thread in off-topic about how often female characters get the worst lines).
Mind you, I am well aware that many johns will treat women poorly in general, but that is a consequence of societal misogyny and less so a feature of the profession.
I was a rentboy for a few years when I was younger and cuter.
It was fine and better than a paper round.
Prostitution isn't illegal in the UK, however.
I agree with those who hold the views in your second paragraph. And I am not religious in any sense of the word. It's just logical to me that women are devalued by a prostitution-condoning society.I don't understand these "puritanical" comments. People oppose prostitution for far more nuanced reasons than "puritanical roots."
Prostitution, arguably the most controversial of the "vice" industries, is unpopular because people feel it commodifies women. They view sex for pay as coercive, not consensual. Feminist opposition to prostitution is based on the belief that prostitution is a misogynist construct to begin with and industrializing it legitimizes the idea that women are for sale.
There are other arguments that interpret sex as a form of labor and no different than any other labor-intensive occupation. There are arguments that women should be able to do whatever they want with their bodies. There are arguments that commercialized prostitution validates everything feminists oppose pertaining to the objectification of their sex and there are arguments that commercial prostitution liberates and deregulates women to make decisions about their own sexuality.
There is an immense amount of argument to be had over this topic and no conclusion, for or against, is "common sense."
How is prostitution handled in other parts of the world?
I agree with those who hold the views in your second paragraph. And I am not religious in any sense of the word. It's just logical to me that women are devalued by a prostitution-condoning society.
So it shouldn't be legalized.
Legal, and regulated (in modern countries, that is).
You want to do it? So be it, and be sure to pay your taxes. xD
And prostitution means men and women alike, of course.
I'm sympathetic to this view.
But let's assume that prostitution, like the recreational use of narcotics, is going to happen regardless of pervasive morality and even legal enforcement. Even the harshest dictatorial and/or religious regimes in the world have been unable to stomp it out.
Is it not more sensible and humane to design policy around the acceptance of this phenomenon and putting the energy into mitigating the worst effects?
The Dutch have it figured out over here, but I know that back home in America, it's political suicide to bring it up. Just like being an atheist or Muslim, you have nearly zero political future if you talk about anything other than how prostitution is bad mmmkay
That's an old debate. These things happens regardless. The problem is wouldnt legalize it leads to accept it as a norm in our society ?
I feel like there is something I'm missing here. Anyone mind helping out the slowest child in the classroom?It's already legal. It's called pornography.
In prostitution, one person pays another for sexual gratification.I feel like there is something I'm missing here. Anyone mind helping out the slowest child in the classroom?
The answer is a lot more complicated than "lol puritans." If you have legalized brothels, you're still going to have young women working there that were teenage runaways that got turned out by some guy, only now it's legal for them to give $40 blowjobs at the expense of their well-being. I don't want to see any of these women in jail, but legalizing doesn't make all the parts of it that are really gross go away.
Individually yes they would be able to discriminate, the brothel or business could not discriminate. If no girl was willing to accept a customer I think they could refuse the customer on grounds that they cannot serve them.
Just like a hair stylist could refuse to do a certain hair style they have no knowledge in.
Tell me more, no i am not asking for a friend i am just genuinely curious.